LLMs don’t reaso

And, uh, it's interesting to me how much I just saw John Stewart's interview with the guy who quit and started all this nonsense a couple of weeks ago about how he has, you're going to destroy the world.

Um, Jacob's some funny name.

It's hard to pronounce.

And, uh, He believed, it was amazing, he quickly deflected the discussion down to where everybody lets it go, where it's JIs are going to end all jobs and we're all going to have universal high income.

Everybody's going to be rich because the AI will just give us all the money.

And everybody talks about whether it's a good idea to lose your job.

which is amazing to me because none of that is going to happen.

It's just like Donald Trump's $5,000 check.

Right now, we already have enough wealth to make everybody rich, and the rich people take it all and the poor get nothing.

So when we have four times as much and the AI robots produce vast wealth, the rich will take it all and the poor will continue to have nothing.

There's never going to be this period of us having all lost our jobs and being idle.

We'll be scrabbling for survival while the rich live in their glorious utopian bunkers or something.

It's all nonsense because the rich are going to take all these glorious things and the poor will have nothing.

That's absolutely.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Sam, I will tell you in the 70s, I remember this so well.

I was told that computers were going to make our lives easier and reduce our work weeks from 40 hours to 30.

Right.

And we'd have all this leisure time.

And we would if we would settle for that lifestyle, but we didn't.

And also if things were more or less equally distributed, which they aren't, especially now.

I mean, Elon Musk put on Twitter a few years back, well, if someone has a practical plan to end world hunger...

I would fund it, but that can't be done.

And so Amnesty International, somebody said, sure, we could do that for $6 billion.

And, uh, it's interesting to me how much I just saw John Stewart's interview with the guy who quit and started all this nonsense a couple of weeks ago about how he has, you're going to destroy the world.

Um, Jacob's some funny name.

It's hard to pronounce.

And, uh, He believed, it was amazing, he quickly deflected the discussion down to where everybody lets it go, where it's JIs are going to end all jobs and we're all going to have universal high income.

Everybody's going to be rich because the AI will just give us all the money.

And everybody talks about whether it's a good idea to lose your job.

which is amazing to me because none of that is going to happen.

It's just like Donald Trump's $5,000 check.

Right now, we already have enough wealth to make everybody rich, and the rich people take it all and the poor get nothing.

So when we have four times as much and the AI robots produce vast wealth, the rich will take it all and the poor will continue to have nothing.

There's never going to be this period of us having all lost our jobs and being idle.

We'll be scrabbling for survival while the rich live in their glorious utopian bunkers or something.

It's all nonsense because the rich are going to take all these glorious things and the poor will have nothing.

That's absolutely.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Sam, I will tell you in the 70s, I remember this so well.

I was told that computers were going to make our lives easier and reduce our work weeks from 40 hours to 30.

Right.

And we'd have all this leisure time.

And we would if we would settle for that lifestyle, but we didn't.

And also if things were more or less equally distributed, which they aren't, especially now.

I mean, Elon Musk put on Twitter a few years back, well, if someone has a practical plan to end world hunger...

I would fund it, but that can't be done.

And so Amnesty International, somebody said, sure, we could do that for $6 billion.