Okay, so Stu, what goes into a position stand? You know, we've, we've both been part of these, and this recent one with ACSM, was it the classic you're sort of locked in the room and arguing and debating?
Or was, was this one online, or how did you, how did you meet to discuss all this stuff?
I probably started bugging people at the ACSM in about 2019-'20, saying, "This needs to be revised.
We probably need to use some new and updated and better methods." You know, 2009, well, that was the year the first Avatar movie got released.
iPhones were two years old, so, uh, we've, you know, we've come a long way since then.
Maybe one of the biggest studies, and at least the most important studies that's come out in the last 20 years just did.
This is the crown jewel of scientific research when it comes to strength training.
Okay, so w- what is the American College of Sports Medicine? You know, w- why were they the people to put out this position stand?
Yeah, the, so, so the American College of Sports Medicine, the largest, I think, sports medicine or sports science organization in the world, uh, 50,000 members worldwide, 80 different countries.
How do you build the team? Who, who gets selected to be part of, of this? Who's a voice at the table?
It started with a proposal, and there are guidelines for how the committee is, is composed of early versus senior investigators, uh, men and women so that we have both perspectives.
I was sitting on boards and, and, and committees inside the organization, and I just started sort of talking to a few people and saying, "Hey, you know, like, it's been a while since we..." And they're like, "Yeah, we, we should probably do that." And I'm like, "Yeah, you probably should," and sort of saying.
They're like, "Well, who do you think?" I'm like, "Oh, I might be avail," you know? So the other thing that, uh, was, was new this time around is that we had four students on the position stand, uh, Brad Currier, Alicia D'Souza, Caroline Lowitz, and Jeremy Steen, all of whom worked with me.
And, you know, a big shout-out to, to Brad Currier, former PhD student who, uh, who led the charge, brought the evidence together, did the lion's share of the writing, and, and really got the, got, got the herding of cats started, if you like.
How had the science changed from, you know, what went into the 2009 statement, and then how does that compare with, I guess, the extent of science that's gone into the 2026 one?
I think at the time, you know, there was literally, you know, a handful of studies done in mostly middle, I would call them, to advanced trainees, mostly football players.
Okay, so Stu, what goes into a position stand? You know, we've, we've both been part of these, and this recent one with ACSM, was it the classic you're sort of locked in the room and arguing and debating?
Or was, was this one online, or how did you, how did you meet to discuss all this stuff?
I probably started bugging people at the ACSM in about 2019-'20, saying, "This needs to be revised.
We probably need to use some new and updated and better methods." You know, 2009, well, that was the year the first Avatar movie got released.
iPhones were two years old, so, uh, we've, you know, we've come a long way since then.
Maybe one of the biggest studies, and at least the most important studies that's come out in the last 20 years just did.
This is the crown jewel of scientific research when it comes to strength training.
Okay, so w- what is the American College of Sports Medicine? You know, w- why were they the people to put out this position stand?
Yeah, the, so, so the American College of Sports Medicine, the largest, I think, sports medicine or sports science organization in the world, uh, 50,000 members worldwide, 80 different countries.
How do you build the team? Who, who gets selected to be part of, of this? Who's a voice at the table?
It started with a proposal, and there are guidelines for how the committee is, is composed of early versus senior investigators, uh, men and women so that we have both perspectives.
I was sitting on boards and, and, and committees inside the organization, and I just started sort of talking to a few people and saying, "Hey, you know, like, it's been a while since we..." And they're like, "Yeah, we, we should probably do that." And I'm like, "Yeah, you probably should," and sort of saying.
They're like, "Well, who do you think?" I'm like, "Oh, I might be avail," you know? So the other thing that, uh, was, was new this time around is that we had four students on the position stand, uh, Brad Currier, Alicia D'Souza, Caroline Lowitz, and Jeremy Steen, all of whom worked with me.
And, you know, a big shout-out to, to Brad Currier, former PhD student who, uh, who led the charge, brought the evidence together, did the lion's share of the writing, and, and really got the, got, got the herding of cats started, if you like.
How had the science changed from, you know, what went into the 2009 statement, and then how does that compare with, I guess, the extent of science that's gone into the 2026 one?
I think at the time, you know, there was literally, you know, a handful of studies done in mostly middle, I would call them, to advanced trainees, mostly football players.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.