For this, we really first have to consider the media landscape of the early 2000s.
At this time, most people still got their news from outlets that at least nominally followed journalistic standards.
And in this system of information, which had strong gatekeeping limits, Russia was stuck outside of the system.
Other pro-Russian outlets would follow that were directly and openly funded by the Kremlin.
And with this, they somehow managed to get into the European and American public debates.
But at the end of the day, everyone knew, okay, these are the pro-Russian channels.
Suddenly, people all over the world were using these social media platforms and it allowed the Kremlin to reach these people with much lower media budgets.
And it was in these times that Russia started to figure out, OK, how can we use social media at our advantage? Not by just only having our own own broadcast channels, have channels set up there, but also by doing influence operations where people claim to be independent and totally unrelated to the Kremlin, but still amplify all those pro-Kremlin narratives.
Before he became the infamous leader of the Wagner Group, he was leading one of the biggest operations around troll farms.
And by some estimates, the Internet Research Agency reached around 130 million Americans on Facebook.
No, yeah, this is an interesting way to put us in the context, but what comes to my mind is how at least these couple examples you're mentioning, both in 2016, both in Brexit and in the US, were 10 years ago.
For this, we really first have to consider the media landscape of the early 2000s.
At this time, most people still got their news from outlets that at least nominally followed journalistic standards.
And in this system of information, which had strong gatekeeping limits, Russia was stuck outside of the system.
Other pro-Russian outlets would follow that were directly and openly funded by the Kremlin.
And with this, they somehow managed to get into the European and American public debates.
But at the end of the day, everyone knew, okay, these are the pro-Russian channels.
Suddenly, people all over the world were using these social media platforms and it allowed the Kremlin to reach these people with much lower media budgets.
And it was in these times that Russia started to figure out, OK, how can we use social media at our advantage? Not by just only having our own own broadcast channels, have channels set up there, but also by doing influence operations where people claim to be independent and totally unrelated to the Kremlin, but still amplify all those pro-Kremlin narratives.
Before he became the infamous leader of the Wagner Group, he was leading one of the biggest operations around troll farms.
And by some estimates, the Internet Research Agency reached around 130 million Americans on Facebook.
No, yeah, this is an interesting way to put us in the context, but what comes to my mind is how at least these couple examples you're mentioning, both in 2016, both in Brexit and in the US, were 10 years ago.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.