May 18, 2026 · 1 hr 11 min · 12 segments
Chris talks about what’s new on TV this week (1:25), before briefly reacting to the ‘Lanterns’ trailer (3:01). Then he breaks down ‘Euphoria’ Season 3, Episode 6 by way of a Zach Lowe-esque 10 Things list (4:27). Later, he is joined by Lane Brown, a feature writer for New York Magazine, to talk about his piece “The Feed Is Fake,” which unpacks how stealth marketing campaigns are powering the hype behind some of pop culture’s most viral moments (26:01). The Feed Is Fake by Lane Brown Subscribe to the Ringer TV YouTube channel here for full episodes of The Watch and so much more! Email us! thewatch@spotify.com Host: Chris Ryan Guest: Lane Brown Producers: Kaya McMullen and Kai Grady Additional Video Supervision: Sarah Reddy Order and it will come. Like today. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Available on Business plans.
Sign up to unlock[drum music] This episode of The Watch is presented to you by Amazon Prime.
Ever have a plan come together out of nowhere and realize you're missing something? Like a last-minute beach day, a spontaneous hike, or an outdoor movie night you didn't plan for.
That's when Prime same-day delivery has your back, getting you exactly what you need fast and reliably so you can actually join the moment instead of watching from the sidelines.
Same-day delivery, it's on Prime.
Visit amazon.com/prime to find millions of items delivered fast.
Available in select areas.
Terms apply.
I need support staff to clear the room.
Stand up and walk, now.
Hello, and welcome to The Watch.
My name is Chris Ryan.
I am an editor at theringer.com, and joining me in the studio today is me.
No Andy today, it's just Prince alone in the studio.
I am, however, joined remotely by Lane Brown from New York Magazine today.
He's gonna talk to me about his incredible piece in New York Magazine called "The Feed is Fake," which, uh, scratches an itch that I have been having, uh, a- for a long time, especially ever since, you know, the whole is Geese a psyop debate raged online, and yet I don't really know if it raged anywhere else.
And that's sort of what Lane's piece is about, is why it always feels like everyone is talking about something, but nobody is actually talking about it.
He gets into the exploding, uh, industry of clipping for, uh, social media feeds, but also narrative manipulation.
And then his piece is also, like, a much larger kind of essay about the current state of our cultural conversation and our understanding of what is popular and what matters, which is something that I think Andy and I always grapple with on this, on this pod.
But I am gonna talk a little bit about some, uh, some TV news, and also give you a few thoughts on last night's episode of Euphoria.
As far as, like, what's coming out this week, as always, busy week in new television, but I...
You know, I didn't get a chance to watch any of Dutton Ranch, and I have to be completely honest, like, uh, Beth and Rip, when it comes to the Yellowstone universe, this is a Yellowstone spinoff starring Kelly Reilly and, uh, Cole Hauser.
Their characters were beloved on Yellowstone.
I think that they worked really well as supporting characters.
I'm not so sure I wanna watch a television show entirely dedicated to them, and you don't have to because Annette Bening, uh, amazingly, is also on this show, as is Ed Harris.
But I, I will try to get to that at some point.
Other new releases this week include Maximum Pleasure Guaranteed, which is a new series on Apple TV, um, with Tatiana Maslany, and it seems like it's a little bit of a, a normal suburban woman goes down a crazy rabbit hole when she witnesses something she shouldn't.
Looks like a thriller with some social satire.
I'm, I'm interested to check that out.
Also, we have from Netflix, I believe this week, is The Burrows, which is being kind of dismissively or d- you know, casually referred to as, uh, old Stranger Things or new Cocoon.
But it is about a, a retirement community and, and an incident, possibly supernatural incident, or extraterrestrial incident, always had problems with that word, occurring at this, at this facility.
So, uh, great cast, Alfred, uh, Molina and Alfre Woodard are in it.
But haven't got a chance to check out any screeners of that.
That comes out this week, and I, I think Andy and I will probably hit both Maximum Pleasure and The Burrows at some point.
As far as, like, n- TV news, I mean, they're...
Really the biggest thing is that the Lantern's trailer dropped.
I know Andy talked about Lindelof last week in my absence.
Uh, this trailer is awesome.
Eh, the pairing of Kyle Chandler and Aaron Pierre is the backbone of, of...
That's, like, how a great TV show gets made, is you find the right two people and you fit them together.
And Kyle Chandler as this kind of rugged and, uh, you know, sort of self-involved version of, of Green Lantern, and, and Aaron Pierre is the up-and-coming one who wants to do everything right.
It's, like, a very solid basis for a show.
Um, and there are Watchmen vibes in it.
There is more special effects than I think I was expecting from the trailer, and maybe that's...
They're, they're putting that forward a lot in the, in the trailer just to bring in the DC heads.
But it, it was a little bit more comic booky than I thought because I think the original sort of understanding of this show was that it was essentially, like, a True Detective, but happened to be set in the DC Universe.
It'll be great to see, uh, how it actually shakes out.
I'm, I'm super excited for this, for this series.
Uh, I think what we're gonna do with Widows Bay, obviously the last episode, the one that focused mostly on Patricia, Cato Flynn, uh, we've been singing her praises all season, but this is her standout episode.
Uh, I won't give anything away if you haven't gotten a chance to see, uh, Widows Bay yet, but we'll talk about a couple, a brick of episodes together.
Maybe, maybe on Thursday's show what we'll do is do four and five together.
So for those who don't know, Zach Lowe obviously, uh, now has his own podcast with The Ringer Podcast Network.
I worked with him at Grantland, and at, now at The Ringer, and while he was at Grantland and, and at ESPN, he had kind of, like, a, a great column called 10 Things I Like and Don't Like, which was his notebook dump on the week in NBA that he had been watching.
This is similar for this episode of, uh, Euphoria.
I just thought it would be an easy way to kinda move through what was not necessarily my favorite or least favorite episode o- of all time.
I thought it was, like, a needed setup for what is obviously going to be a incredibly cathartic last two episodes of the season.
Um, I would, I would imagine it's in play of the series, but we'll, we'll see.
Um, first of all, I would say I loved, uh, number one, I loved the col- collection of images that he put together charting Rue's longing and receiving of her, her sign or salvation.
I mean, in the church, like, sh- Zendaya well-litIn a church praying, hearing a call from her mother, you know, her face looks like Passion of Joan of Arc.
You know? [laughs] Like this...
Sam's got a bag, and he goes into it, and I think especially in the, the Rue sequences about her trying to save herself is where the show is still at its best.
And I think that her experiences over the course of this series are the most easily legible from the outside, where you're like, "I can see what happened to this person and I can see what this person wants to become." The images at the end of the episode, her- she's listening to her book-on-tape Bible and it starts skipping, and she almost crashes.
She sees the bright light of the incredibly well-lit [laughs] monster truck or, or s- uh, 18-wheeler coming towards her, and crashes her car or pulls off the road, and a spark gets on a tree and lights this burning bush, and you get this, this incredible biblical image of this woman finally, finally hearing the voice of God, you know? And the, the connections to, uh, the roads to Damascus, the connections of, of Christ and the burning bush, like, it's obviously rich with that imagery.
It...
Does it play fast and loose with it? I think with the Rue stuff it doesn't, because, uh, so much of what addicts go through in recovery and, and in trying to save themselves comes from this relationship to a higher power, and that may or may not work for all addicts, and there are plenty of people who get clean without it.
But obviously, it's something that Levinson is deeply fascinated by, and it doesn't even have to come down to any specific dogma of something you'd find in the Bible, something you'd find in the Old Testament or whatever.
I liked the slap.
I liked the "Get out of my painting." If you think about this show as these people existing in their separate realities, I liked the idea that Jules was sort of snapping Rue out of whatever dream she was having and was like, you know, "You don't actually have anything to trade here." Like, "We are not, um, gonna go off and ride into the sunset.
This is not the love story." Whether or not that remains the case for the rest of the series, I d- I don't know if I, if I believe that, you know, maybe to the extent that you care about something being endgame on this show, but, like, are Rue and, Rue and Jules, like, meant for each other? I don't know.
I don't know if it, it's actually germane to the actual show itself, but I did like that scene.
I don't really know what they're doing with Jules.
Um, and I don't know...
You know, this was a, uh, uh, the, the things of behind the scenes in this production of this show and what it required to get people in the same room to shoot it, I think I sometimes allow myself a little... to get a little distracted by that, because I'll be like, "Oh, you can tell this person wasn't available and they had to shoot all their scenes in, like, a hotel room." Like, I, I don't know if Hunter Schafer had more or less time than usual to shoot or whether or not there was, like, discussions about what to do with the Jules character, but I find, like, she ha- she had her artistic breakthrough on the set of LA Knights, and now seems to be in her, "I am going to do a, you know, a, a body study figure and then paint over it" as, like, her new, like, art phase that she's in.
I don't know if that's, like, really that compelling television, but I like Hunter Schafer as a performer, so I, I wish there was more for that character to do.
Um, as far as more things that I liked and didn't like, look, I love the high and low, and I love the sacred and the profane.
I love the church and the OnlyFans and the spaghetti Westerns and the Polanski dread, the Hitchcockian moments, the '70s noir.
You know, I think that Levinson moves pretty easily between those, and if anything, I think I've oft repeated I'm never bored watching Euphoria.
It's because of those tonal shifts, which even if the transmission really grinds sometimes on them, I still welcome them.
It's still fun to have, um, a completely different feel from scene to scene.
You could say that it's mimicking kind of, like, our s- our feed.
You know, it's like when you flip through social media videos and you're kind of, like, going from one thing to another without any kind of, uh, transition.
That, that, that would be one way of looking at it.
Another is just that he had several different shows that he wanted to make, and he's just gonna make them and then stitch them together.
I think that's also, you could make a criticism of the show, but in terms of, like, the, um, spectrum of tone that he's playing with and also, like, reaching very, very, very high and then also wallowing around in the grime and the grit of something exploitative I think is pretty fascinating to watch.
I also think it's really interesting and I really like the tension between cinematic and TV storytelling.
I thought it was very funny, um, when Sydney Sweeney walks onto the set of LA Knights for her one-line, pretty much throwaway day player part and starts m- improvising or disassociating with the actor who's playing opposite of, from her, and that she obviously is kind of s- thinking it's, she's talking to Nate.
And she does this kind of riff aboutHow, you know, scared she is for her life right now.
And the guy is kind of playing along with her, and it's then shattered [laughs] by the character of Oceana walking onto the set and saying, like, "Are you gonna cue me up or what?" Um, I was very, very highly amused by Colleen Camp saying, "Ah, yeah, it's- this is giving a real Clute vibe." Because I think everybody is always like, in their mind, they're making Clute, you know? Like, [laughs] in their mind, I'm sure everybody would love to be, um, Alan Cool in the '70s and, and that to, for Clute to be what everybody was watching.
But obviously they're making LA Nights, and I think that there's almost a sly commentary happening there where it's, yeah, like, Sam Levinson is making, like, an episodic spaghetti Western opera, but he's also making a soap opera, and he's trying to sort of pay both vipers there.
And I, I like the, the effort.
You know, I don't think it's successful for everyone.
I, I know that Andy has both, uh, rejected some of the storytelling and also the interests, uh, that, that Levinson obviously has.
Um, he's also given it the college try, so I really, I appreciate him doing that for me, 'cause we're, we're enjoying talking about the show.
I think that Levinson, for as much as he's interested in high and low art, he's also interested in television and cinema and whether or not you can bring the feeling of cinema, the cinema that he loves.
And Sam's actually programming a festival out here in Los Angeles over...
Like, I think it started last Friday, and it's going through this week, where he's showing a bunch of movies, um, that he says influenced season three.
And he's showing, like, Dirty Harry and Candy Snatchers, which is, like, a AGFA movie that you, you, you should check out.
And he's showing Freeway, which is, like, the Reese Witherspoon '90s thriller.
So he's, like, throwing a bunch of different, like, things up on the mood board.
And it's hard to take all those cinematic influences and consistently make a television show.
And maybe that's why the production of Euphoria is inconsistent, because it's difficult to translate all of that stuff, but I am, I am enjoying it.
Um, I will say that one thing I, uh, I also enjoyed was Daniel Deadwyler as Alamo's mom.
But, uh, I don't know that I necessarily walked away from that scene truly understanding Alamo any more than I already did.
Uh, but I did think this little, um, message in a bottle from '70s grind house movies or...
It actually wasn't really like that really.
What was it? It was more like an LA noir set in '70s Black Los Angeles, and some people might be like, "The temerity of Sam to do that." I don't know.
I thought it was pretty cool.
Like, it looked great.
Daniel Deadwyler, I will watch read a phone book.
But seeing her play this, uh, Alamo's mother who essentially runs a long con on a, a kindly but, you know, disfigured man to set herself up with her boyfriend, uh, is, is awesome.
It was a cool little, little snatch of time, and it...
Obviously Levinson had a blast making it, 'cause it just looks great.
Uh, it told me nothing about why Alamo was riding at Rue with a polo mallet while she's buried up to her head in sand, and it told me nothing about why he doesn't kill her.
Um, so I enjoy Daniel Deadwyler.
I don't know if that, uh, that segment necessarily was necessary, quote, unquote, but it was very cool.
I think it's also cool that we're returning to meta Euphoria.
I- this is a degree of playing the hits, but one of the season two highlights for me was the show within a show, uh, within a show of Lexi's play depicting on and off-screen events.
The LA Nights thing has potential.
It's coming...
They're calling this, this pitcher in at the seventh inning.
Uh, I, I like the idea of Lexi being responsible for writing Cassie's arc on, uh, LA Nights and also Lexi perhaps thinking of how to kill off Cassie's character and that little throwaway line that Lexi has where she's just like, "You know, what am I gonna do? I'm gonna kill her." And then I think...
I can't remember.
It's, is it Gideon Adlon who's playing that friend? I can't remember.
But she's just like, "You gotta kill somebody every once in a while or else people get bored." That does not bode well for our, our ensemble.
Somebody, uh, somebody may pass away in the last two episodes.
I liked that return to meta Euphoria.
And on its own it's kind of amusing, and I like how every scene with Sydney Sweeney seems to be from another w- universe, whether it's, like, that Hitchcockian kind of tension of whether or not she's gonna delete OnlyFans.
We talked about the sci-fi B movie stuff of a 50-foot woman from a couple episodes ago.
Earlier in the season on the wedding night, the kind of almost Ari Aster-ish horror of Nate's sh- you know, being, getting his, uh, pinky toe chopped off.
Nate is shrinking.
Cassie is growing.
But this leads into my seventh thing, which is unfortunately also something I don't like, which is just Nate.
I mean, he's looking for redemption.
He's trying to find a piece of the American dream.
He's trying to shake off his past, which we get a glimpse of the old Nate as he stomps on the protected flowers, uh, that have held up his, his retirement community construction.
But we get so little time with him, and he gets almost no time with anyone of consequence from the show.That it's kinda hard to tell how he got there and where he wants to go.
And now we're in this ritual humiliation phase that's lasted the better part of the season, and this is my biggest question mark about where they wanna go with this character.
You've got Jacob Elordi.
It doesn't really matter one way or the other if he's having fun, I can't tell, but give him something to do, please.
Like, let- let's do something with Nate.
Can Nate interact with anyone else from the show aside from Sydney Sweeney? I don't know, but it would be nice.
It would be nice to get him...
I loved that moment with him and, and Under Shafer at the wedding.
Like, that, that actually had a charge.
Let's do more of that.
Kinda don't know where I'm at with Maddy.
Eight is not a thing I don't like or like.
I, I just like Alexis Demie and I love, like, this character historically on the show.
Her being a shadow madam of OnlyFans models who's now curious about Alamo's business and, you know, her pursuit of, like, financial gain for security to, like, gird against, like, everything that's happened to her in her life, not unsimilar, not dissimilar from Alamo, I guess.
Her reactions to things, I think, sometimes are a little convenient for the television show and, and, and have nothing to do with the character.
I think that that's, like, I- understandable in terms of writing a TV show.
You have to have s- people just kind of go along with stuff, but we're getting towards the end of this season and series, and I'm not exactly sure how they're gonna bring together, like, the Alexis Demie part of this show, the Nate part of this show, the Jules part of this show, with the thing that's the most successful, which is the, the Rue part of the show.
Though there is one thing that's starting to bug me about the Rue part of the show, and it, after I've sort of, like, waved away every criticism about, like, "But what about this and what about that?" when it comes to, like, talking with Andy about Euphoria this season, and I'm like, "You don't get it.
It's a vibe.
It's a feeling.
Just, just go with it." The crime plotting is starting to get to me.
That's, uh, I don't know if this is actually 10, but I'm calling it 10.
Uh, we're doing too much and explaining too little here.
Laurie is going to give up Alamo to the FBI, thus forcing him to work with her and allow her to use his m- m- I guess, uh, ambulance service to bring fentanyl from Mexico into the States because the border is closing.
I'm not sure I buy that.
I, it, typically, like, in crime dramas, like, the threat of revealing someone to the FBI is, like, more of, like, a, a mark on your reputation, and I, I think that Alamo wouldn't be just so, like, "Ah, checkmated by Laurie." Now, I know Alamo has, uh, uh, ulterior motives here where he's also trying to get his stuff out of Laurie's safe and perhaps everything else that Laurie has, but this seems like it's, uh, one extra, like a hat on a hat.
That's a good beef.
They should have a shootout and work this shit out [laughs].
You know? Like, whatever.
Let's get, let's get these characters getting after it.
Now being vaguely in business with each other while also intending on, uh, killing one another and robbing one another is, is a little thin.
And then, uh, you know, I'm not so sure why Rue is being given all these important gigs if seemingly everyone in Alamo's crew knows she's a rat.
So, uh, we obviously end with the, the rat and, you know, we have the rat and the snake for Rue, uh, before she goes on the road.
She's terrified because her mother is now in danger.
Um, you know, we know that Alamo never lets a woman get over on him, but I don't really understand why Rue is now becoming the, you know, the agent of revenge against Laurie.
It doesn't seem like she is the most dependable person.
It's not like she's, like, a, a, she's not a burglar.
She's not a gunman.
She's just a convenient person to work in a strip club and manage the girls until she wasn't.
I don't really understand why not, like, when everybody shows up at Alamo's house with guns, I don't really understand [laughs] why the...
The shootout probably should've happened then.
Um, and now we're, we're off for another element of this.
This was more, among the more, you know, amusing parts of the show for, for much of this season, so I hope that they tighten the screws a little bit.
I have a feeling based on what we saw as the trailer for next week that next week is going to be largely focused on Colman Domingo's Ali character and how that, I mean, seemingly his health incident impacts her.
So I wonder if I had to guess, it's like, take a beat and then the big crime happens in the finale.
I don't know.
I, I don't know, I don't know when the, the moment is, and I don't know how much it's gonna feel like a series finale versus a season finale.
Um, those are my thoughts on Euphoria.
I wanna get into my conversation with Lane Brown.
So I introduced Lane a little bit, uh, in the beginning of our convo, but I'll just tell you, I- I've worked with Lane about 15 years ago, uh, when Grantland started.
Lane is somebody I've always really admired, and he's now a features writer at New York Magazine where he does some really, really, really great reported pieces.
And the thing that makes this, uh, Feed Is Fake piece so fun to read to me is that it's really, really deeply reported, and it's really fascinating to read about all these different methods that marketing, digital marketing companies are using to populate our feeds with clips of shows and music and movies that we're, we're then supposed to be talking about, supposed to be ingesting.
But it's also about, like, how the narrative around those things get shaped, and then really more, it's Lane kind of writing this, you know, awesome rant about, like, how do we even know what things are actually popular, and it, does that even matter anymore? And-You know, we had talked about the, the Geese PSYOP controversy on this show and on Wait A Second a couple of weeks ago when it really popped off, and that's what really got my interest in this going, but I've also had this, like, nagging feeling for a while.
I've noticed a really perceptible change in the tone of online discussion, like no shit, but not in the way that you think, not in, like, this everything is getting angrier way, but that, like, everything kind of is starting to sound the same.
Like, it's ...
I'm starting to just be like, I can't tell the difference between the post above and the post below if you read on Reddit.
Or, you know, everybody's Instagram is starting to kind of, like, merge into one Instagram, and this kind of everything is being optimized for engagement because I think that this has, like, become way more important than connection with other human beings.
Like, yeah, in your stories you might, you know, be following what your friends are doing at any given moment, and that's kinda like my primary use of Instagram, but that whole other side of it with Reels and then I think especially for TikTok where people are making content more or less, has led this to our phones being, like, our new connection to what we think a conversation is about culture in the world.
And Lane writes about that beautifully, and I really wanted to talk to him about this piece.
It's kind of a different look for the pod, but I thought it would be fun, um, on, on a random Monday to do this.
So, thanks so much to Lane Brown for joining me, and thanks to Kai and Sarah and Kaya for producing today.
I'll be back on Thursday.
We're gonna talk about Widow's Bay.
I'll have a guest, and I'll, I'll get into deep Widow's Bay lore then.
But thanks to everybody for listening, and let's get into my conversation with Lane Brown.
My guest is my former Grantland colleague, I should put that first, uh, and current New York Magazine features writer Lane Brown.
Lane, it's so great to see you, man.
We were just remarking that I think the last time I have seen your face is as you were leaving Los Angeles [laughs] and I was arriving in Los Angeles.
Chris moved in, and I, I moved out.
Yeah.
[laughs]
It's, uh...
And it is an honor to be here on my, my favorite podcast, the, the only-
[laughs]
... organically popular podcast, uh, in the world.
And also maybe perhaps the least clipped in, in [laughs] anybody's-
[laughs] Exactly.
No, actually, you know, we are doing-
It's good to know that
... more clipping.
Uh, last week New York Magazine published Lane's article, which is one part deep dive into the exploding clipping economy that has, uh, taken over algorithms, and one part jeremiad about how this shadowy industry has distorted our understanding of the conversations taking place within our culture.
I think that's, that's if I had to pitch it to anybody, I suppose that's what I would say.
And for people who've been listening fairly closely to The Watch over the last couple of weeks, this stuff has come up in conversations even though we haven't known it.
And, uh, Jon Semley wrote an article called The Fanfare Around the Band Geese is Actually a PSYOP, actually was a PSYOP.
And the piece is largely about the unorthodox practices that Cowdy good use, used on behalf of Geese.
Mm-hmm.
But this is, like, Lane, I, I wanted to know, that's, like, sort of my in on this article.
I saw this.
Um, there's a funny story I have to tell you, like, after I, we hear from you for a little bit.
But, you know, I think that that was sort of my in on your article.
But what was the thing that kind of was, like, the kernel of, of the idea that got you to write this piece?
It's sort of a two-parter, basically.
I, on, uh, I, I feel like I have been noticing things, uh, just every story I try to write, uh, uh, just in my sort of daily intake of information.
Uh, you know, I'm, I'm looking on Reddit.
I'm, uh, you know, I'm seeing w- you know, what the, what the voice of the people is on, uh, you know, in the internet comments.
And then, uh, I don't know, I, I've kind of noticed, uh, just sort of more and more things, uh, I don't know, a little, little strange.
And so I did a story on real estate a couple of years ago that was all about how, uh, New York City rent prices were just sort of exploding at a time when basically people were leaving the city.
Uh, and, uh, just in these, these, you know, New York City apartment Reddits and just, uh, they, they would be full of people saying, like, "Um, you know, this is not happening.
The, nobody's leaving.
Uh, people are moving in.
People are flooding back." I was like, "This is just totally not the, not the case." So I, I sort of noted that, and I, I saw the, kind of the same thing over and over again when I was, as I was working on some other stories.
And then I found this, this service.
Uh, I'm not gonna say the name of it because I maybe don't want to give them, uh, I don't want to do the, any product placement here.
But basically there are services that will essentially advertise your product within Reddit comments.
Uh-
Uh-huh
... and I thought, "Oh, this is really, uh, you know, they've, they've, they've really figured something out here, and they've, they've got me." Uh, and so I, I've kind of, you know, I've been begging, uh, my poor editors at New York Magazine to let me write a version of this, uh, for so long.
And finally the, sort of the, you know, the Geese thing came up, and suddenly this was a thing that was, you know, sort of in the conversation, and I was finally able to break them down, but after years of, uh, of sort of twisting their arms.
And so they finally kinda let me, uh, uh, let me take a couple of weeks and, uh, and sort of dig into this.
The other thing too also is I have no idea what's popular anymore.
Yeah.
Uh, as somebody that, you know, cares a lot about culture, I, uh, was the culture editor at New York Magazine for a long time, and I, my job was kind of, all right, figure out who people are gonna care about in six months so we can put this person on the cover.
And it used to be kinda simple to do that.
Uh, we had, you know, things like ratings, uh, uh, back in the olden days, and so, uh, you know, that was fairly easy to do.
And it got harder and harder and harder, and now I just have absolutely no idea.
I don't know.
Uh-
Yeah, 'cause I-
Right
...
the way people maybe started dressing because of the way Jeremy Allen White dresses on that show.
Right.
It's a different kind of influence.
It's maybe people saying things and not even knowing that, "Yes, chef" is from The Bear.
[laughs] You know?
Right, right.
[laughs]
But it, it goes hand in hand with there's different kinds of impact that shows can make.
And I think we, you know, over the course of our lives and, you know, uh, especially working in music, there are bands that are important and there are bands that are big.
Right.
And that's always been a tension in the media is to, like, you know, are we making too big of a deal out of a band just because we personally like them, so we're gonna fashion some narrative about why this is the only band that matters?
Right.
When there is objectively NSYNC or somebody who is, like, exponentially bigger than The White Stripes or something like that.
And y- that, that kind of back and forth has always been really fascinating.
And like you, dude, I have ne- I don't think there's ever been a time-
Mm
... where I've been less certain of not only what, how many people are watching something, and you get at this in your piece where you talk about when you really start to go in about, like, you know, all of this stuff being made by companies that have no incentive to share how-
[laughs]
... people are watching it, how deeply people are watching it, how much they're paying attention to it.
It's so complicated now.
I'm sure you've had this experience now when you're, like, even talking with friends or if you go to a bar and, and TV or movies come up, and the, the amount of siloing that's going on now where somebody is like, "Yeah, man, I w- I am, like, a For All Mankind, every scene completist."
Right.
And then the next guy over is like, "I don't even...
I don't, I have no idea what you're talking about."
[laughs]
And both are conversant in television.
Right.
Yeah, it's, it, like, every conversation about culture has that, has that, that sidebar, uh, about, like, where you sort of justify, uh, how popular you think a thing is.
And it's like, oh, my, I was talking to my niece about this, or you always bring in, like, this, uh, as your evidence, like a cooler young person that you, uh, that you know or something that is somehow more tapped in than you.
Or, uh, you know, yeah, I was at brunch, and I, I overheard this and everything.
And it's, we sh- in theory, we should be able to track this stuff better than ever.
Uh-
Yes
... everything is, uh...
And, and but, uh, yes, there is no incentive, uh, on the part of these companies that are, you know, making this stuff to actually share that data with us.
And so we are just, uh, uh, y- you know, trying to look for every sort of strange little signal that we can find about how big one thing is.
And uh, uh, and, uh, kind of unfortunately, in this vacuum that we, we have now, it's become really, really easy to sort of fake these signals of, of popularity.
And so I feel like, uh, we do not have a very clear view of, uh, [laughs] of, of reality, uh, which is kind of, uh, yeah, kind of strange.
And so I, I wrote mostly about, uh, you know, TV, pop music, sort of, uh, celebrity gossip, like the frivolous stuff, but it's like you can obviously see the implications for, for everything here.
It's like we're getting, uh, you know, all of our information, uh, right now through the same, uh, you know, sort of rectangle in our, in our pockets-
Yeah
... through, through social media.
And it's, uh, uh, it's so easy to sort of get a, a distorted look at, uh, just reality with this, and so it's, it kind of terrifying.
[laughs]
And well, it creates an ecosystem in which I think that, I'm sure you find this challenging as a reporter and as a, as a features writer, where I think in m- my romantic conception of what my dad used to do as a newspaper journalist, you know, even though he was a film critic.
But, like, he would still have to gather a lot of information, especially when he was a crime reporter.
The crime reporting happens in the courts, you know? Like, you would go down to the courthouse and sit there and wait for an interesting case and, and then be like, "Oh, this is good.
This was a rich kid, got into a car accident and is trying to get out of it.
This is a good article," or, "This is a good hook for a piece." But we're l- deriding, deriving a lot of our concept of what is, what is popular or what is unpopular or what is beloved or what is being said about all those things from online platforms that are very susceptible to the kind of manipulation, uh, data inflation, and also narrative construction that, in some ways, I'm like, the game is the game.
And I, I think-
[laughs]
... you've probably heard some pushback about this piece where it's like, how different is this from, say, Paola? How different is this from street teams p- plastering stickers all over a city for a band in the '90s? I was wondering if you could give our audience, without aggregating yourself, 'cause I, I do want-
[laughs]
... people to read the piece, uh, just an idea of what clipping is and how it maybe is a little bit different from, say, a digital marketing campaign for a band, a TV show, a movie 10 years ago.
Basically, if you've got a, a song or a, a movie trailer or a TV show, you, uh, you take it, and you cut it into social media-friendly clips, like short 20-second clips, and then you find a bunch of dummy social media accounts that will post all of this online at huge volumes.
And essentially, as you do that, you are tricking the social media platform algorithms into, uh, interpreting it as a, uh, uh, basic, a sign of organic interest in this thing.
And so when that happens, the platforms sort of push these videos far and wide to users who ordinarily wouldn't have seen it.
And then sometimes, uh, they will kind of engage with it, and that will sort of, you know, add even more fuel to the fire, too.
It's, yeah, it's a thing that started only, uh, not too long ago.
It's, uh, probably at this point four, five years old, but, uh, really kind of in the last year, it's really sort of, uh, become a thing that everybody's doing.
Oh.
And so it's, it's tiny artists and big artists and everybody in between are, are doing it.
Do you feel like it grew out of-Something organic.
So, like, obviously TikTok and Instagram Reels, uh, one of the, like, sort of pillars of how you make stuff on there is to soundtrack it or interpolate clips of things.
Like, I follow a Thick of It memes account on Instagram where it's just scenes from The Thick of It, you know, being posted all day long.
Right.
And I'll just be like, "Oh, that's a, that's a funny line." That's p- primarily how I've, like, re-watched that show in the last two years.
I don't really know that there's a lot in it for the Thick of It producers to have that still on my feed.
But-
Hmm
...
I'm curious whether you think that this has become a weaponization of organic fan interaction or if it's something different than that.
That's a good question.
It is really, really hard to tell, and I feel like that's kind of the point.
Uh, I think that the people doing this have probably learned from things that actual, you know, fans were doing, and they saw that it, you know, uh, worked, uh, in one way.
But now it's like the, the volume is different.
It's, uh, you know, it's not just a, a couple of fans making...
Uh, you know, adding a song to a, a clip of, uh, Euphoria or something.
This is like 50,000 videos of the same thing being sort of dumped into, uh, social media all at the same, you know, over the same weekend to basically kind of like overflow the, the toilet, uh, and sort of get this, uh, uh...
Sorry to be scandalological.
No, you've obviously get this-
But, but yeah, sort of get this-
As a watch listener, you should know [laughs] it's fine.
[laughs] I think why it's different from, uh, you know, sure, there are b- people that say that, you know, this is, uh, payola, fine, has always kind of existed.
The fact that we don't have any trusted culture metrics at all anymore, uh, to tell us what's actually, you know, popular or, or not, uh, is, is sort of one thing.
And so we, you know, in the olden days, you could check a street team, you know, people putting up stickers or something, uh, against like SoundScan sales and, uh, you could kind of see the gulf.
But now there's just nothing to, uh, sort of check, uh, this against.
It is just trivially easy to do.
Yeah.
It is, like, so simple.
Uh, it's, uh, everybody's doing it.
It's at a scale that I think is, is, is different.
It's like it's not just in one city that this is, you know, you're putting up, uh, posters.
This is like you're blasting this out to the entire universe of, uh, uh, you know, TikTok's user base really, really quickly.
Uh, and so the, you know, the, the scale of it is, is pretty different.
So y- the clipping stuff happens obviously on video, but you were talking a little bit about the, the feeling you were getting reading Reddit threads.
And I, I certainly agree that there seems to be, over the last couple of years...
I can't really pinpoint the moment, but it reminds me a lot of like, you know, Twitter, I think, went from this thing that was sort of everybody's running, like, gag journal over the course of a day and was very much directed towards, like, a select group of followers.
And then, like, right when we started working at Grantland is when I think it became the primary promotional tool for journalism in, in the world.
Right.
And there was...
That, that had its benefits, and obviously also I think made everybody slightly insane.
Um-
Mm-hmm
... and then now it's kind of like a rage factory where you go, and if you look on your For You page, at least when I do, there are people having these, like, insane arguments about things that I'm like, "Wait, how do- why are you guys even fighting about, like, how-
[laughs]
...
My Bloody Valentine isn't that good? Like, what, who started this fight?
[laughs]
Why is this now r- like, crossed over to six different friend circles that I seem to ha- have and, or businesses, you know? And, like, some guy from Bloomberg is like, "Actually, My Bloody Valentine-
Right
... is the best." And I'm like-
Right.
[laughs]
... "Why are you commenting on this?"
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
[laughs]
There's this...
So the, I digress just to say with Reddit, I noticed a real, um, collapse of voice.
Like, everything started to sound exactly the same.
Um, and obviously on Reddit you can comment anonymously, and if you click on someone's user profile, often they'll be like, "This person has hidden, like, their activity." Uh, w- is...
How much of, of what interested you about this project was not only, like, the obfuscation of data, the inflation of the sense of popularity that people can have, but also the shaping of narrative around cultural objects?
Clipping is sort of one technique.
The other thing that they're doing now is, uh, this thing that Chaotic Good sort of put a name on it.
I don't know if this is the, the name sort of used by everybody, but narrative campaigns, uh, where they are basically, uh, yeah, using internet comments, using dummy accounts to, uh, comment on things in a way that makes it seem like, you know, everybody is talking about a, a thing in kind of the same way.
And so you see it on Reddit.
You'll see it, uh, you know, you'll see it happen on Twitter.
A couple of people that I talked to, I thought this was sort of interesting.
It's like clipping is something that you wanna do at, you know, huge volumes because you wanna push this out to everybody.
Uh, narrative campaigns are a subtler thing.
You actually don't want that many people to notice this.
You want kind of the right people to notice this.
Uh, you want, uh...
You know, it's sort of a, a light sort of sprinkle of, uh, uh, of sort of like narrative juice on a, on a story to kind of shape something.
And then, you know, once you do that, you can then, uh, use these other accounts to, like, amplify, uh, certain arguments, too.
And so, uh, yeah, it is, it is really interesting because it's like it seems like a lot of the pop culture fights that we've had over the past, you know, I don't know how many years, have basically been, uh, seemingly the, the result of some of this, uh, some of these techniques.
And so in the, the story, I talk about, uh, you know, one example is, like, Bad Bunny in the Super Bowl.
Yeah.
Uh, for, for a month, there was, this was the loudest argument in America.
Uh, you know, the NFL has hired this, this Spanish-speaking artist to perform.
Uh, uh, and then, uh, you know, people are upset about that, and other people are sort of defending this.
And, uh, it, uh, yeah, it turns out that, uh, basically the, uh, these bot detection firms that, that track this kind of thing found that, uh, basically the shape of the argument was exactly the same on both sides.
Yes.
[laughs]
And the, and their, these accounts were basically posting at the same time, maybe in the same time zones, uh, which is sort of suggestive of, uh, something coordinated.
Uh, and so yeah, when you, when you think about that, it's like all of these things that we're just, you know, at each other's throats about, uh-All the time.
Uh, it's like, you know, how much of it is real? We have no idea.
[laughs]
... on a montage of Sixers highlights?" [laughs] That would-
It's, yeah
... you know, it's like-
Dreams come true, yeah.
But the Bad Bunny thing is a really, uh, good segue into the thing that I, I wanted to ask you about.
You know, uh, I was talking with, uh, well, both...
Y- I guess your former colleague in, in a sense I, at Grantland, Kirk Goldsberry.
We, he works with us at The Ringer now, and we were chatting about...
For some reason he hit me up about like why is everybody talking about the Kevin Hart roast? And I was like, "Yeah, me, me too, although I don't know who's talking about it," because really what's happened is it has been atomized down to its 30 most important 30 second clips, completely decontextualized from like the fact that that was like a three-hour show on Netflix-
Right
... that I find roasts like s- super uncomfortable to watch.
[laughs]
[laughs]
Honestly don't understand them at all.
It's excruciating, yeah.
And yet it is, um, I think Kirk called it like my junk feed, where there's all these things that everybody I talk to seems relatively conversant in, but you can't find a single person who's like, "I absolutely made time to watch-"
[laughs]
"... a three-hour roast of Kevin Hart," and have a-
Right
... concert- like a, an opinion about it.
And there's tons of stories like that.
Like I, I am a person who likes the Bad Bunny I have heard, does not give a shit who plays the Super Bowl halftime show, and-
Right
... like was very aware that that was like a weaponization that worked for both parties.
Like-
Right
Right.
Yeah
... kind of thing where I'm like, how the fuck are we talking about this for a third week? Like, and, and who-
Yeah
... actually is like-
[laughs]
... every day I wake up and go to bed thinking about the Super Bowl halftime show?
You really do have to wonder how many of these people actually exist.
Who gives a shit about anything? Like, uh-
[laughs]
...
I, people have enough, uh, enough on their plates, uh, I would think.
I don't know.
I can't imagine being upset about, you know, enough about anything to, uh, sort of log on and, and go off anymore.
I talk about, uh, Justin Bieber using this for Coachella.
Uh, uh, at least we think so.
Somebody paid to clip, uh, Justin Bieber's Coachella performance, and I, I really thought, uh, you know, I, maybe I, I don't know if I have to go into witness protection after this.
[laughs]
Uh, like am I gonna be, I mean, i- is this gonna be, you know, uh, uh, are people gonna be after me this weekend? Uh, and uh, you know, I was out walking around.
I didn't hear from one, uh, Belieber.
Uh-
Yeah
... uh, and so it, it really, it's, like just how much of this is, how much of this, uh, uh...
How many p- paper tigers are there out there? It, uh, you know, how much of this is real? It's like, uh, we hear about the, you know, these fan armies that are supposedly just, uh, you know, burning people's houses down every time you say a negative word about, uh, whichever pop star, and it's like, uh, how much of that is real? Uh, or, and how much of that is just bots sort of, uh, you know, bullying, uh, you know, people into, uh, uh, into submission? It, who knows.
It's, it's really, uh, it's a, yeah, strange, strange world out there.
But there is like real world implications to it.
I mean, obviously like our political landscape is completely like shaped by this kind of online discussion.
I mean, going through the Los Angeles mayoral race here now, and you can see a lot of the old, uh, positions being taken, the, the same ones that have been sort of, people have been manning since 2016.
There's like a-
Right
... a sort of progressive spoiler candidate.
There is a far right-wing reality TV like candidate.
Like, there are two people kind of in the middle trying to s- scrap to see who's gonna get into the runoff, and watching people talk about it online, even sometimes people I personally know, I'm like, oh, it kind of feels like you, if you're gonna actually take the, the indignity of posting, you are m- still parroting one of like seven pre-agreed upon positions, right? And most of the time-
Exactly
...
I think it's almost reflexive now that people say things.
I find this sometimes even talking to Andy, I'm like, I don't know how to make my point without making it in an extreme way, right? Like-
[laughs]
... um, I don't know how to say like I acknowledge this without saying I hated it or I loved it.
Um, and I think that that's something that I see a lot in criticism and in online discussion of culture now, where it's like the, the idea of something being like a two and a half star, three star out of five star thing-
Right.
[laughs]
... has completely vanished.
You know?
Right.
Because even if you think that, there's like a really vocal contingent of people somewhere online, or quote, unquote, "people", who are like, "This is actually the GOAT sci-fi show.
This is, this is-
Right.
[laughs]
... better than 2001," and you're like, "Uh, God, man, I really, really don't think so." [laughs]
[laughs]
But that doesn't mean I think it's an unredeemable piece of crap.
I just don't wanna spend 30 hours watching it maybe, yeah.
The, the negative engagement, the stuff that starts arguments, is the stuff that sort of goes, goes further, and so I think that's more kind of more of what you see.
Well, okay, Spencer Pratt is obviously clipping it up.
Yes.
Yes.
Uh, like he's got, he's got, uh, clipping events started going, going full time.
Uh, although he is, uh, to, uh, the, to his credit at least, he's, I think he's, because of election laws, he's gotta disclose it, and so he's the rare, uh, uh, you know, sort of clipping event that actually you-Sort of know where it's coming from.
Most of the journalism in the world now has sort of disappeared behind pay walls.
Yeah.
And so we are getting the TLDR version of stuff for the, you know, the stories that we're not subscribers to, uh, from the, you know, the, the tweet about it or the, you know, the quote tweet or the, you know, the comment in, uh-
Or the argument about it afterwards.
Yes.
Yeah, exactly.
And so the, it, the terms of the debate are basically set by whatever that argument is, which is really easy to, uh, you know, sort of amplify a real thing or just completely astroturf it from, from scratch.
Uh, and so it's, uh...
Yeah.
So I think that's probably another reason why you're seeing it's like everything is the most extreme kind of, uh, you know, fight, uh, that it could possibly be because that's, you know, it's, uh, somebody benefits when that, when that happens.
Yeah.
And you see, I mean, we ...
And this has been going on since we were kids, but you see all the time on the left and the right, political candidates, television shows, pieces of music, movies, TV, you know, whatever, are essentially rejected from trying to occupy some sort of, like, middle ground.
You know, like, the, the, the stuff that really kind of at least drives conversation is the stuff that's gonna be, and increasingly the m- the more extreme kind of version of whatever we're, we're talking about.
Um, you know, I always try, on this show, Andy and I always have this kind of running conversation about doing something because it's, uh...
Doing, like, covering a show because we think it's popular and, and there are shows that, um, are hugely popular, but d- not w- necessarily within the algorithm that we follow.
So something like, say, I think the Sheridan shows, Taylor Sheridan shows are a good example of something-
Yeah
...
I, I cannot honestly say that we would do as much Taylor Sheridan coverage if those shows weren't obviously very big.
Right.
Taylor Sheridan also would not have made 13 shows in four years-
[laughs]
...
if he wasn't big, and if Paramount and hadn't decided, like, this was what we're gonna bet the farm on.
By that same token, you know, we cover Euphoria on a week-to-week basis.
I think that's a very big show.
I, uh, most of my friends have stopped watching it.
You know?
[laughs]
Like, um, so it's, it's a, it's always this murky thing feeling around in the dark for a light switch.
And the thing that's funny about what you were writing about, especially, like, you know, when you're talking about Geese, which is a band that I like and I kind of wonder if you don't based on your description of-
[laughs]
... how Cameron Winter sings.
I like a good, uh, yeah, caterwaul.
Yeah.
But I was, like, mildly offended by, like...
I'm not, I'm not being manipulated, man.
Like, I like Geese.
I like, you know-
[laughs]
I, I, I started liking Geese two years ago.
[laughs]
[laughs]
Like, uh, do you f- did you come across anything in your research or in looking online and seeing these Discord servers where people are, you know, begging someone to clip Apple TV shows or what have you, where you were like, "Oh, well, I like that thing, though"?
[laughs] Chaotic Goods roster, uh-
Yeah
... has got some good stuff on it.
Uh, and, uh, uh, so it was kind of maybe a little bit, yeah, disappointing, I guess, to, uh, uh, to see that.
But I, I also, uh, you know, I also understand.
It's, uh, we are s- this whole system is so broken that, like, you kind of need to, uh, you need to do this.
You're either in or you're out.
And so being in means, uh, you know, sort of resorting to some of these, uh, sort of shady techniques.
I was in these Discord servers for, uh, three or four weeks and, uh, basically I would ask the publicists of the, uh, the people being clipped, uh, you know, "Is this something that you, uh, you know, did...
Is this something that was paid for by the, you know, the artist and their, or their, or their team?" And, uh, nobody wants to talk about this.
They're, everybody's doing it, but I think, you know, for understandable reasons, they don't, uh, uh, they don't wanna talk about it because it is just kind of, uh, lame, I guess, would be the, the word.
Like, it's, it's really sort [laughs] of a bummer that, that, uh, this is what we've come to.
But, uh, at the same time, I totally understand why Geese or, uh, you know, McGee or, uh, you know, whoever, uh, has to do this because one of the things that this does, it's not just, you know, the artists that, that do it are, are sort of in the conversation, it's basically everybody who doesn't do this is, uh, sort of left out of the, the conversation.
You can't help that it gets too many of the artists themselves.
It's, uh...
I feel like it's more of a, a information ecosystem problem that is, is complicated-
Yeah
... and it's the, I blame the platforms, I think, more than anybody.
At one point you mentioned, like, the Chaot- one of the Chaot G- Chaotic Goods narrative-shaping tactics was if an artist has a performance on Saturday Night Live, at midnight you're posting it, and the narrative, the comments under the video should be, "This is the greatest live performance I've ever seen.
This is the best live show I've ever seen on Saturday Night Live.
Like, we have our new Strokes.
We have..." Like, there's, like, an obvious, like, echo of, like, there's this, uh, a sort of excellence or supremely, like, amazing thing that's happening rather than, like, "Cool," like, "They played on s- SNL," or whatever geeky thing some fan would say w- if they saw their favorite band playing on SNL.
I was wondering whether or not you felt like, you know, you kinda mentioned this with the paywalled media, traditional media sites, but whether or not you felt like this had kind of filled this vacuum where I don't even know where I would go now to find out what someone thought of an SNL-
[laughs]
... live performance anyway.
I mean, when we were coming up, there were plenty of things that recapped Saturday Night Live on Monday.
There were plenty of articles where it was like, "It sure seems like this band is having a moment." That would kind of shape maybe a narrative around it, but that's not in the artist's hands.
The artist is hoping that Jon Pareles at The New York Times or, or somebody at Rolling Stone is, like, into them enough and is like, "Yeah, that was good." But-
Right
... you know, it's easier maybe to say, have, like, a lot of, like, a stan army of Ashley Padilla fans who are like-
[laughs]
... "This is the new Kristen Wiig." I don't know.
It is really hard for, uh, for culture journalists, and I think just journalism in general, to, uh, to know anything anymore.
I think that this is, uh, like, I don't know where to go to find out, uh-You know, what's, what's actually popular.
I, I used to think that I had my, my finger on things, but, uh, all of the advertising sort of moved to short-form video.
Yeah.
All of the, yeah, the websites that you would, uh, you'd sort of go to to, you know, find out what a writer, uh, sort of thought about this stuff have, uh, you know, uh, some of them are still hanging on, but, uh, it's like a quite a lot of them have disappeared.
And so it's, uh-
Yeah
...
it is, it, I don't know, it's really tough.
Uh, I, I don't think, uh, you know, uh, I am no better at anybody else, uh, than anybody else at, at figuring this out.
I'm, like, just, you know, fumbling around in the dark here.
Yeah, I mean, it's also like there's a degree to which there's like, I, I would actually be curious to get feedback from, from this conversation from people who are not necessarily working with it within the media or are not handcuffed to their laptops 12 hours of the day and kind of working for seven of them, but also like ambiently looking online at stuff.
Because I do think that that phenomenon, while it gave us careers, it also is kind of why sometimes it's really hard to tell, like, is there a whole world out there that doesn't give a shit about X, Y, or Z thing that we're writing about or arguing about? I, I know there is.
Sure.
Um, but what are they, what do they care about? You know, because it's, it's, maybe they are not watching as much TV or listening to as much new music or care about whether Obsession made $15 or $16 million-
[laughs]
...
this weekend, but they're engaged with culture on some level or, or else, like, we cannot be propping this entire thing up.
So how do they get their information, and how, how seriously do they take what they see on their feeds? It's, it's, it's, it's an impossible question to answer maybe.
Sort of a culture emergency, but, uh, you know, the people I worry about maybe the most though are the artists themselves.
Uh, because, uh, nobody has any idea what's popular.
Nobody knows what people are actually responding to anymore.
This is, like, we, we talked about, okay, like in the old Grantland days, we covered a show like Mad Men, which 200, 300,000 people watched, but we understood that the people that watched that show would maybe come to our-
Yes
... website and, and read about it.
Uh, but, uh, you know, now it's like the, the, uh, and we knew it wasn't as popular as Big Bang Theory, for example.
Uh, but I feel like the, yeah, it's, it's impossible to compare something like, uh, I don't know, Beef to, uh, uh, you know, House of the Dragon.
I have no idea which is, uh, which is, has sort of more of an impact.
Uh, you know, you just think of an artist trying to pitch, uh, something right now.
Mm-hmm.
And it's like, I don't know what, uh, you know, they don't know what kind of feedback they're, they're getting.
Sort of their, their market research has just sort of been run through this, uh, this whole, you know, sort of distortion pedal of, uh, uh, of social media that, that really kind of warps everything.
Yeah, so like, it's, it's just, it's hard to know.
And so I, I feel like, uh, you know, I, I think about how the fact that, uh, you know, every show on TV lately seems to be, uh, sort of derivative of, like, the, the White Lotus or it's like we had a...
I know a couple of years ago, like, the agencies were telling, you know, uh, telling everybody, it's like, "All right, no more nice out, uh, riffs," uh-
Yeah
... and anything.
And it's, it, it's like I kind of wonder, were those like the last two shows or the last two, like, culture products that we sort of had hard numbers for-
[laughs]
... uh, uh, for the, you know, original things? And now, uh, you know, we're just sort of, uh, reinterpreting them into perpetuity because we, we have nothing else that, uh, uh, with, like, real data on.
It's, uh-
It's so hard-
And it, it-
... 'cause like, but back when you, you and I were working together, like something like Homeland would come on.
It would be a sensation for two years.
I mean, it was a very popular show for its entirety, but, like, those first couple of seasons of Homeland were like, it felt like you would come in on Monday, and people would be like, "Let me know when you're ready to talk about Homeland," you know?
Right.
Right.
Um, and that's what this, like literally this podcast is built off that premise, that there are these-
Sure
... five, 10 shows a year that, yes, we, Andy and I are happy to recommend 100 shows or 20 shows in a year, but there are gonna be five or six that, like, we feel confident, like, that Mad Men group of people are gonna be like, "I wanna talk about this or hear people talk about it." That Homeland thing that would then lead to 10 Homeland rip-offs that-
Right
... would have varying levels of success or critical appreciation, and then they would kinda shed that and get out.
But you're right.
It's like I don't even know what I would try to imitate now.
Like, I don't even know-
Yeah
... what a show, like White Lotus is a good example.
I think that there's a lot of reasons for that.
One is, I think, shows-
[laughs]
...
T- TV networks maybe are like, "This is great," 'cause this is, like, a very controlled environment.
You can isolate people, so that's essentially, like, we don't have to worry a lot about extras.
We don't have to do a lot of set pieces.
[laughs]
Like, it's just find a good location, have a mystery, and then have people betray one another, and that's great for us.
Um-
Totally
...
[laughs]
...
Empire or, or a procedural on a network?"
Right.
But I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know if you can, like, recreate that magic.
And by that same token, if you clipped it enough [laughs] and if you had, like-
Maybe you could
I'm not sure.
Talking to some of the people I've talked to, uh, I believe you could.
Obviously, shows fail all the time.
Obviously, things get canceled all the time.
Things just don't work.
Things, you know, don't catch on.
It, it feels like there's a way to sort of put your finger on the scale a little bit more than there, than there once was, and you can sort of declare a, a hit by, by fiat a little bit.
I don't know.
I think you guys were having a conversation the other, the other day about Apple, uh, shows, and it's like a hit on Apple is different from a hit on, uh, obviously Netflix or, uh, any other service with more subscribers.
And so you're, you're dealing with things at totally different, uh-Different scales.
And so if a show without a lot of viewers, its survival prospects on Apple TV are probably better than they are on-
Yeah, I think, I think that-
... on Netflix.
And so, yeah
... there's something to Apple's volume play is still modest compared to Netflix.
Uh, they seem to be way more willing to bring shows back.
I don't know what their bo- budget and model is, and if it's different from show to show.
Like, I, I will s- routinely see renewal announcements or a new season of something that's in season four or five.
Traditionally, a lot of these places, they wrap things up by season three, either because they see, like, an attrition in viewership, or because that's when contract renegotiations come up with cast.
Right.
And I don't understand the economics of what Apple is-
Mm
... playing at.
It's pretty much a write-down for them in their larger business.
Totally.
So I don't, I'm not sure.
And then you get into something like Netflix, like you're saying, where their data, to me, is incomprehensible.
More people watched Bridgerton season three than watched the moon landing.
[laughs]
Uh, uh, is, like, my- my favorite stat.
Uh, yeah, uh, none of it makes any sense.
Everything is incomprehensible.
Who, who knows? Uh, it, but interestingly enough, so the, one of the things that I mentioned in the piece, The Night Agent was something that was being-
Yeah
... uh, being clipped.
And, uh, and yet, uh, sort of if you look at the numbers they released, that show was massively popular.
It's like every episode was watched more than the Super Bowl or something, at least in season one or two, I think.
I guess.
[laughs]
Uh, and so what is the...
So then why, why do we need, uh, why do we need clippers at all? So it's, uh, yeah.
I, uh, I think we have a, uh [tsks] I don't think we have a clear [laughs] clear view of, uh, uh, of any of this anymore, and it's- it's getting, uh, I don't know.
It's getting a little scary.
So I, yeah, I'm a single-issue voter at this point.
[laughs]
Real hard, uh, culture metrics.
Bring back the old scenarios.
Um-
Yeah, I think that would...
Exactly.
That would fix a lot.
Let's wrap it up by discussing, like, where you see this is going next, because this piece begins and ends, if I remember correctly, with, uh, uh, was it Joe Lim, the guy from Flood.fi?
Joe Lim, yeah.
Yeah.
Um, who, uh, m- s- your piece starts with an assertion from Joe that, that 90% of what you're seeing on your fa- feeds is essentially fake advertising and, uh, or, or shadow advertising.
It's, it's essentially, like, there is, like, some, hey, a dollar per every thousand views, um, uh, incentive for somebody to post it.
And, uh, he...
That, that statement kinda chilled me to my bone because, you know, if I kill 25 minutes looking at my phone, I'll have th- one part of my brain that's, like, just smoothed out and is looking at cats and soccer highlights and whatever.
And then there's the other part that's like, "Isn't it weird that, like, I've just gotten 11 videos that are the same template or have the same similar prompt?" Or, like, something like Top Jaw will be popular, and then 150 Top Jaw s- style shows will be in my phone all of a sudden of, like, guys getting interviewed on the street about what their favorite something is.
But Joe seems to be suggesting at the end of this piece that this is all coming to an end.
Uh, what do...
Can you, can you tell us a little bit about that?
So Joe thinks, uh, that, uh, basically, uh, uh, he thinks eventually people are gonna stop trusting what they, what they see in their social media feeds.
He thinks this has gotten so bad, and I kinda, I- I think [laughs] I sort of agree with him.
This is, it's so clear.
I, I think people n- really are noticing this more than they, more than they used to that, uh, uh, you know, there's just so much, so much astroturf, uh, that he thinks eventually people will be turned off from this.
But he thinks that the, you know, the clippers, at least the people that are doing the, the, the clipping now, they're going to basically be, uh, sort of directing all of this, uh, content at, uh, at AI.
Yeah.
And so, uh, soon, you know, maybe we're not gonna open social media apps.
And he thinks that if, uh, basically if they hit these, uh, uh, LLMs with enough, uh, sort of volume of, uh, uh, you know, s- stealth marketing, that that will, uh, you know, basically sorta trick the LLMs instead of tricking, uh-
Yeah
... yeah.
Uh, e- even now, if you...
Okay, so, like, the other day, I was like, I think I...
Who was I thinking about listening to? It was some, some band that had 12 albums, and I was just kinda like, "I'm not quite sure where to start," and I just, you know, did a usual Google search of X artist ranked, which gives you a Gemini summary of what the two or three peak albums are in terms of, like, critical appreciation, but also these are the cult records.
And then obviously, there are the Reddit threads where people are ranking them.
Mm-hmm.
Um, there's, like, rate your music threads.
There's all these things where you can kind of find that information.
But I noticed, and I think everybody has this experience now, that they're very rarely going past that Gemini summary of the answer-
Right
... to your question now.
And so that vision of the future, that idea of basically your Google result being a prompt you give, uh, your AI agent, essentially, where you're just like-
Right
... "Hey, I wanna listen to Salem.
What's music like?"
[laughs]
"Like, what are the best w- like, witch house songs?" And it creates-
Right
... a playlist for you, or it tells you, like, people like this.
It's like, well, where are they getting that information? Like-
Right
... where is this, where is the learning happening? And I, I would imagine that there's also a worry that, like, AI agents probably already are operating multiple, like, social media f- feeds and just keep working from a prompt from an actual human owner are populating our feeds with this kind of stuff.
This happened to search first.
Uh, it's like where search has just been completely sort of overtaken by spam.
And, uh, that's, I think, where we're headed with, uh, with, uh, with social media.
And so people, I think, are eventually gonna, yeah, escape.
I do kind of wonder if it's like, uh-Uh, you know, some of this is purposeful.
It's like Google is, you know, they want you to use Gemini.
They don't want you to use their, their, their search engine anymore.
And so maybe they're tanking, uh, uh, you know, on purpose here and pushing you to, uh, to, to Gemini.
And so, you know, then, uh, Gemini will then take in this, uh, uh, you know, s- huge amount of, uh, of, uh, undisclosed advertising and then sort of spit that back to you in the form of, uh, uh, you know, supposedly personalized recommendations.
I, I find it too.
I ask ChatGPT all the time.
It's like, what are, uh, what are five, uh, you know, albums that, uh, I've never heard before that sound a little like, I don't know, uh, Alligator by Echo & the Bunnymen or something?
Yeah.
And they'll spit me back, like, incredible, uh, recommendations that, uh, you know, I never would have found any other way.
Uh, and [laughs] uh, yeah, I feel like this is, this whole thing is circling for that, I think.
Yeah.
S- somewhere a, a, a bald record store employee is like, "I could have told you if you had just come to me."
[laughs] Exactly.
"I would still have a job." [laughs]
[laughs] Exactly.
Oh, man.
Um, Lane, thank you so much for joining me today.
Uh, this has been awesome, and, and this piece is incredible.
We'll, we'll link it in the show notes, uh, obviously, and, uh, you can read Lane's writing on New York Magazine.
I would, I would, I'd tell you where to follow him on social media, but-
[laughs] You won't find it there
Uh, Lane-
Exactly
... great seeing you, man.
Thanks again to Lane Brown.
You can read his piece in New York Magazine.
We'll have that piece in the show notes for the pod on Spotify.
As always, you can watch us on Wringer-TV, on YouTube.
You can write us at thewatch@spotify.com.
Follow us on Instagram at thewatchpod_.
It's very funny to say these things after having this conversation with Lane.
I wonder if Kai feels any extra pressure with Clips this week after, you know, can you put up Geese numbers, dude? Thanks to Kai and Sarah and Kaya for producing, and we'll be back next, uh, on Thursday.
Take care.
[upbeat music]
“How real are the feeds we trust?”
“Here’s how opinions get manufactured quietly.”
“First, the playbook behind those clips.”
“A recent uproar that wasn’t organic.”
“Where this manipulation heads next.”
“Why online conversations skew louder.”
“A hard truth for today’s artists.”
“Success now depends on the platform.”