Jun 19, 2026 · 53 min · 10 segments
In this special two-part Chalk & Talk mailbag series, Anna Stokke is joined by Jonathan Regino, Pre-K–12 Supervisor of Math at Interboro School District, to answer questions submitted by listeners…
Anna StokkeHost
Jonathan ReginoGuest
Many of my students lack basics, and so even on topics like fractions, I am reteaching concepts I would have assumed they mastered years ago." So as I said, another sort of version of that same question about gaps.

"I am wondering to what extent the breadth of the standards is causing teachers to move from topic to topic too quickly without adequate practice to move from novice to master.

For example, I am wishing that I could exclude any equations information at all from sixth grade if we haven't truly mastered fractions.

I'm hoping you can find some guests to discuss whether the standards might be moving too quickly through topics and depriving students of mastery.

I wonder if the state reorganized the system, simplified it, and reduced it, if we might get stronger results." Thoughts, Jon?

So number one, the reason why you're doing review is because the students aren't getting the content to long-term memory.

The way most textbooks are designed, even the ones that are circular and keep coming back, they aren't doing interleaving or space practice correctly.

I teach a lesson, the next day I move on to the next concept, or I add the next layer onto that concept.

If you find yourself always reviewing, or when a state test comes, you shut down, and for a week you're practicing for the state test, chances are that the kids aren't learning the material well enough to get it so it's in that long-term stage.

If, you know, your curriculum's not designed for that, then you are essentially rewriting your own curriculum, and depending on the rules in your school district, you might be allowed or not allowed to do that.

And you take in the testing days, the state testing days, the assemblies, and everything else, you have way less than 180 days.

So if I'm gonna spend two, three weeks reviewing, I'm gonna have to remove two, three weeks of content.

Math builds off itself, and if you teach math in a version of patterns, you can save yourself a lot of time.

So for example, in America, we teach one digit plus one digit, and then one digit by two digit, then two by two, and then two by three, and then three by three, and so on.

Many of my students lack basics, and so even on topics like fractions, I am reteaching concepts I would have assumed they mastered years ago." So as I said, another sort of version of that same question about gaps.

"I am wondering to what extent the breadth of the standards is causing teachers to move from topic to topic too quickly without adequate practice to move from novice to master.

For example, I am wishing that I could exclude any equations information at all from sixth grade if we haven't truly mastered fractions.

I'm hoping you can find some guests to discuss whether the standards might be moving too quickly through topics and depriving students of mastery.

I wonder if the state reorganized the system, simplified it, and reduced it, if we might get stronger results." Thoughts, Jon?

So number one, the reason why you're doing review is because the students aren't getting the content to long-term memory.

The way most textbooks are designed, even the ones that are circular and keep coming back, they aren't doing interleaving or space practice correctly.

I teach a lesson, the next day I move on to the next concept, or I add the next layer onto that concept.

If you find yourself always reviewing, or when a state test comes, you shut down, and for a week you're practicing for the state test, chances are that the kids aren't learning the material well enough to get it so it's in that long-term stage.

If, you know, your curriculum's not designed for that, then you are essentially rewriting your own curriculum, and depending on the rules in your school district, you might be allowed or not allowed to do that.

And you take in the testing days, the state testing days, the assemblies, and everything else, you have way less than 180 days.

So if I'm gonna spend two, three weeks reviewing, I'm gonna have to remove two, three weeks of content.

Math builds off itself, and if you teach math in a version of patterns, you can save yourself a lot of time.

So for example, in America, we teach one digit plus one digit, and then one digit by two digit, then two by two, and then two by three, and then three by three, and so on.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.