Travis MerriganGuest
Eoin ComerfordHost
Let's talk tariffs, because this week we got the biggest trade policy news since the Supreme Court threw out the IEEPA tariffs back in February.

If you've been listening since the beginning, none of this should come as a surprise to you.

Tariffs were literally the first topic on the first episode of this podcast way back in March 2nd of this year, where I predicted that the administration would use Section 301 and 232 to come up with new tariffs once the clock ran out on the blanket 10% tariffs from Section 122.

As of Friday morning, the exact day that the 150-day clock expired on the Section 122 tariffs, new tariffs went into effect on 60 economies, accounting for 99.4% of US imports.



Now, five major trading partners, the European Union, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, and Switzerland, receive a net of existing FMN duty treatment.

So in general, the combined MFN and Section 301 rate is brought up to either 10% or 12% rather than automatically adding that full new rate on top of the existing MFN rates.

Okay? So why two tiers? Why a 10? Why a 12 and a half? This is where we get to the legal basis, which is, and I'm quoting the government here, "The failure to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor." So if your country has a forced labor import ban on the books, or you promise to adopt one in a trade deal with the US, you get 10%.

Now, forced labor, uh, let's just sit with that one for a second because it's awfully convenient.


Does anybody believe this administration is losing sleep over forced labor conditions in overseas factories? This is the same White House that has spent 18 months treating human rights language in trade agreements as an inconvenience.

Let's talk tariffs, because this week we got the biggest trade policy news since the Supreme Court threw out the IEEPA tariffs back in February.

If you've been listening since the beginning, none of this should come as a surprise to you.

Tariffs were literally the first topic on the first episode of this podcast way back in March 2nd of this year, where I predicted that the administration would use Section 301 and 232 to come up with new tariffs once the clock ran out on the blanket 10% tariffs from Section 122.

As of Friday morning, the exact day that the 150-day clock expired on the Section 122 tariffs, new tariffs went into effect on 60 economies, accounting for 99.4% of US imports.



Now, five major trading partners, the European Union, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, and Switzerland, receive a net of existing FMN duty treatment.

So in general, the combined MFN and Section 301 rate is brought up to either 10% or 12% rather than automatically adding that full new rate on top of the existing MFN rates.

Okay? So why two tiers? Why a 10? Why a 12 and a half? This is where we get to the legal basis, which is, and I'm quoting the government here, "The failure to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor." So if your country has a forced labor import ban on the books, or you promise to adopt one in a trade deal with the US, you get 10%.

Now, forced labor, uh, let's just sit with that one for a second because it's awfully convenient.


Does anybody believe this administration is losing sleep over forced labor conditions in overseas factories? This is the same White House that has spent 18 months treating human rights language in trade agreements as an inconvenience.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.