Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
Sep 22, 2026 · 56 min · 12 segments
Should Congress approve President Trump's $350 billion defense budget request through reconciliation, without requiring any spending cuts to pay for it? The president wants it to come through…
Mackenzie EaglenGuest
Brittany MadniGuest
Henry OlsenHost
You know, I think Operation Epic Fury has exposed what I've been worried about for far too long

my work at AEI and what the data shows, which is that we essentially have a one more military.

I'm not really sure what that means, but we are having a difficult time militarily achieving the political objectives that the president has laid out for Operation Epic Fury.

So there's been a generation of challenges confronting the Defense Department and the profession of arms, and they're all exposed right now in real time.

So there's no, there shouldn't be I mean, Congress has proven to be less helpful than I would have hoped in the middle of a named, prolonged, pretty violent military operation.

I understand we're not talking specifically about money for an emergency supplemental or something like that for Epic Fury, but that we were speaking broadly about the need for a generational one-time investment that President Trump has asked for in his 2027 defense budget request.

Both are actually necessary because money's getting shifted around constantly.

You know, while they might be three different requests, Epic Fury, 27 reconciliation, 27 base budget, the way the dollars actually move around in defense is that right now, because Congress has been unable to pass 27 appropriations on time into law, the funds are all getting mangled and shifted and nothing's actually working at its peak optimization.

And so the point of the one-time mandatory spending for defense is terrific, actually.

The Defense Department is held to different sets of rules for spending than other feds

And so in this case, what One-time infusion does is it jumpstarts necessary investments that have been kicked.

The can has been kicked down the road, like I mentioned, for 20 plus, you could argue 35 years now.

You know, I think Operation Epic Fury has exposed what I've been worried about for far too long

my work at AEI and what the data shows, which is that we essentially have a one more military.

I'm not really sure what that means, but we are having a difficult time militarily achieving the political objectives that the president has laid out for Operation Epic Fury.

So there's been a generation of challenges confronting the Defense Department and the profession of arms, and they're all exposed right now in real time.

So there's no, there shouldn't be I mean, Congress has proven to be less helpful than I would have hoped in the middle of a named, prolonged, pretty violent military operation.

I understand we're not talking specifically about money for an emergency supplemental or something like that for Epic Fury, but that we were speaking broadly about the need for a generational one-time investment that President Trump has asked for in his 2027 defense budget request.

Both are actually necessary because money's getting shifted around constantly.

You know, while they might be three different requests, Epic Fury, 27 reconciliation, 27 base budget, the way the dollars actually move around in defense is that right now, because Congress has been unable to pass 27 appropriations on time into law, the funds are all getting mangled and shifted and nothing's actually working at its peak optimization.

And so the point of the one-time mandatory spending for defense is terrific, actually.

The Defense Department is held to different sets of rules for spending than other feds

And so in this case, what One-time infusion does is it jumpstarts necessary investments that have been kicked.

The can has been kicked down the road, like I mentioned, for 20 plus, you could argue 35 years now.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.