Sep 17, 2026 · 49 min · 10 segments
In this episode, hosts Jaime Frederick and Kallee Lins interview recent NDP candidate Shannon Devine about her strong by‑election performance in the…
Shannon DevineGuest
Kayleigh LentzHost
Jamie FrederickHost

About 167 projects are included in the prospectus, and this includes 11 conventional energy projects, 31 clean energy ones, glad we've got some of those on the table at least, 63 in mining and metals, 16 in marine and port infrastructure, 11 in power and utilities, 10 in digital technology, and 19 in advanced manufacturing and six transportation projects.

I think Avi has been doing a wonderful job of being very outspoken in the media about just the impacts of selling off so many of our resources and so much of our infrastructure to foreign investors and really really raising an alarm about that.

So I think we've been getting some good coverage amidst what is a bit of a bleak pitch for taking over Canada, economically speaking.

And then some of those projects that you mentioned there that are on the sales block today and tomorrow are energy projects that the prime minister and his government have recently dropped.

from impact assessment review, including pipelines and oil and gas projects.

This is as reported by IADU4 on iPolitics.ca, but the more technical Canada Energy Regulator will now solely review these projects despite concerns voiced during consultations this summer that the move would weaken scrutiny of cumulative effects, species at risk, climate change, and indigenous rights.

A liberal government source told iPolitics that the rush to implement that regulatory change before Parliament resumes is tied to the West Coast oil pipeline proposal backed by Alberta and Ottawa.

So more of the same, I guess, from this government, but certainly cause for much concern.


He's criticized the investment summit as a plan to, quote, save this country by selling it off, unquote.

Where I'm deeply critical is who is benefiting from our resources, from our infrastructure projects.

I think if we're going to move ahead with some very tough choices about some very heavy development and investment, it should be Canadians that benefit.

And, you know, some of these projects were would have been previously subject to the Impact Assessment Agency, which was a government body that would evaluate, you know, broad environmental, social health and economic effects of the of them.


About 167 projects are included in the prospectus, and this includes 11 conventional energy projects, 31 clean energy ones, glad we've got some of those on the table at least, 63 in mining and metals, 16 in marine and port infrastructure, 11 in power and utilities, 10 in digital technology, and 19 in advanced manufacturing and six transportation projects.

I think Avi has been doing a wonderful job of being very outspoken in the media about just the impacts of selling off so many of our resources and so much of our infrastructure to foreign investors and really really raising an alarm about that.

So I think we've been getting some good coverage amidst what is a bit of a bleak pitch for taking over Canada, economically speaking.

And then some of those projects that you mentioned there that are on the sales block today and tomorrow are energy projects that the prime minister and his government have recently dropped.

from impact assessment review, including pipelines and oil and gas projects.

This is as reported by IADU4 on iPolitics.ca, but the more technical Canada Energy Regulator will now solely review these projects despite concerns voiced during consultations this summer that the move would weaken scrutiny of cumulative effects, species at risk, climate change, and indigenous rights.

A liberal government source told iPolitics that the rush to implement that regulatory change before Parliament resumes is tied to the West Coast oil pipeline proposal backed by Alberta and Ottawa.

So more of the same, I guess, from this government, but certainly cause for much concern.


He's criticized the investment summit as a plan to, quote, save this country by selling it off, unquote.

Where I'm deeply critical is who is benefiting from our resources, from our infrastructure projects.

I think if we're going to move ahead with some very tough choices about some very heavy development and investment, it should be Canadians that benefit.

And, you know, some of these projects were would have been previously subject to the Impact Assessment Agency, which was a government body that would evaluate, you know, broad environmental, social health and economic effects of the of them.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.