JD Vance Said Tucker Is Just A Political Disagreement. Is He Wrong.

that are hot they're so hot stories circulating right now they're hot stories right now and we gotta we gotta talk about it we gotta talk about it we got to

i'm gonna roll a clip uh we're gonna react to it but i'll start by saying this Look, for those of you that know me, that follow me, that have watched the show, that have watched the podcast, I'm a benefit of the doubt guy.

OK, I give people the benefit of the doubt, sometimes to my own detriment.

Sometimes I've been wrong about people.

Sometimes people have become the very caricatures I defended of them becoming Candace being a prime example.

I kind of defended the civil conversation we had.

I thought it was a better approach.

But, hey, she ended up making her own bed and going full retard.

What are you going to do? But, you know, I still hold that having discernment and important conversations and dialogue, not jumping to using anti-Semitism as a one size fits all accusation in every scenario.

I think that's unproductive and wrong.

And, you know.

I'll get to my point shortly, but I saw last night a debate with Alan Dershowitz and Dave Smith, and I just thought it devolved so quickly.

Look, I agree with Alan on his positions, generally speaking, but... we'll get into that in a whole other episode devolving into calling dave smith a bigot and an anti-semite i mean there was just a a lot of things that were sort of out of touch i think in that uh debate conversation whatever you want to call it kind of lost the subject matter and i think devolved and became uncivil and yeah shame on

you shame shame on you for invoking a trope you know i i

to be critical that was not wise that was not true or smart i'm not defending dave smith's positions but in terms of civil debate and dialogue the fact that it arrived there i think there's a much more sophisticated way to present those arguments maybe i'll have dave on this show and we'll hash it out i'm considering it because i watch these conversations and when people represent your point of view and your positions and i think fail to do so properly it's very frustrating but let's get to jd vance okay let's get to jd vance Because I'm going to roll this clip.

It's going around and I've been making some clipping up some stuff from my last live stream a couple of days ago about J.D. and what the issues are and that the issue isn't actually J.D. Vance.

It's its proximity to Tucker Carlson, who is an insidious, nefarious.

Disingenuous, dishonest actor in this space.

So he's asked.

He had this talk at the RJC, which I guess they didn't clip up.

There's no media coverage.

Video recording of it.

Not sure why they didn't do that.

Maybe that was the condition, but it got out.

Let's just watch the clip first and then I'll give you my two cents on it.