Aug 28, 2026 · 45 min · 10 segments
"She spent 12 years inside the rooms where America decides who to sanction and who to fight. She is not sentimental about any of it. New episode out now. Michael J. Hershman sits down with Hagar…
Michael J. HershmanHostWell, many, many years ago, and I now go back to the late 1990s, we had a problem with that regime, and it was overthrown.
That was a problem of very brutal dictatorship, obviously, and there's some similarities.
But that didn't turn out too well for us, that replacement of that former regime.
What makes us think that it'll be any better if we replace this current regime?
No, you know, it's an interesting question because it's never going to be perfect.
I can tell you from my time having worked in counterterrorism in the U.S. government, handling the Middle East, that the majority of our threats stem from threats emanating from the Iranian regime.
It's all of the proxies, militias and terrorist groups they fund in the region and their operations that are global, by the way, including in the United States.
So those are really global threats that the majority of US resources are focused on tackling.
And I always say that to people so that they understand the type of threat this regime poses.
I don't want to imply I don't think anybody should imply that we're better off with them there versus the instability that we could see with a collapse of the regime, because it's just not black or white.
Now, you can see the Trump administration trying to rewrite this playbook of regime change.
if the model they've used in Venezuela does work, this idea where you take out the leader somehow, in that case abducted, Maduro was abducted, you take him out, you find somebody you can work with, you keep the elements there so that it's unlike Iraq, you keep the elements there and you find ways to incentivize those elements or leaders to work with the United States to start putting in place democratic norms or practices, working toward free and fair elections or releasing political prisoners or so on.
But you can see that the Trump administration is viewing that as an ideal model.
Well, many, many years ago, and I now go back to the late 1990s, we had a problem with that regime, and it was overthrown.
That was a problem of very brutal dictatorship, obviously, and there's some similarities.
But that didn't turn out too well for us, that replacement of that former regime.
What makes us think that it'll be any better if we replace this current regime?
No, you know, it's an interesting question because it's never going to be perfect.
I can tell you from my time having worked in counterterrorism in the U.S. government, handling the Middle East, that the majority of our threats stem from threats emanating from the Iranian regime.
It's all of the proxies, militias and terrorist groups they fund in the region and their operations that are global, by the way, including in the United States.
So those are really global threats that the majority of US resources are focused on tackling.
And I always say that to people so that they understand the type of threat this regime poses.
I don't want to imply I don't think anybody should imply that we're better off with them there versus the instability that we could see with a collapse of the regime, because it's just not black or white.
Now, you can see the Trump administration trying to rewrite this playbook of regime change.
if the model they've used in Venezuela does work, this idea where you take out the leader somehow, in that case abducted, Maduro was abducted, you take him out, you find somebody you can work with, you keep the elements there so that it's unlike Iraq, you keep the elements there and you find ways to incentivize those elements or leaders to work with the United States to start putting in place democratic norms or practices, working toward free and fair elections or releasing political prisoners or so on.
But you can see that the Trump administration is viewing that as an ideal model.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.