Joshua RauhGuest
Jon SlavetHost
And of course, we know the stats in the state of California of this $350 billion budget.

And in that 1% are a lot of those people with an M and there are many of them in California.

That's a good segue to talk about Newsom and the way he's positioned around the billionaire tax.

He came out against it, but he sidestepped it and said, you know, this should be a national billionaire tax, not a California billionaire tax.

And then of course, Ro Khanna has recently come out and said, we should lower this down to 50 million.

which again is to the issue of California legislators lowering it way down and down and down.

Do you think that Democrats politically make this a centerpiece in 2028? I think it could become a center point for Democrats

I think that for in the primary, I think this is going to be, look, this, you know, this is how you win a primary in the Democratic Party is you try to attack as far as possible to the left.

And, you know, it even took some party intervention to prevent Bernie Sanders from being the Democratic nominee in four years ago.

I'm not sure, you know, despite this wave of populist sentiment that on the left is very well documented, it's not clear the American people are really ready to vote for what is actually asset expropriation.

And, you know, there are many legal arguments why this may well not be constitutional.

And there are just also many practical arguments that I think people will listen to.

You know, people who are small business owners, who own farmland, they would be subject to this at that kind of threshold or slightly lower, but something that's definitely within the sights of the people proposing these policies.

And of course, we know the stats in the state of California of this $350 billion budget.

And in that 1% are a lot of those people with an M and there are many of them in California.

That's a good segue to talk about Newsom and the way he's positioned around the billionaire tax.

He came out against it, but he sidestepped it and said, you know, this should be a national billionaire tax, not a California billionaire tax.

And then of course, Ro Khanna has recently come out and said, we should lower this down to 50 million.

which again is to the issue of California legislators lowering it way down and down and down.

Do you think that Democrats politically make this a centerpiece in 2028? I think it could become a center point for Democrats

I think that for in the primary, I think this is going to be, look, this, you know, this is how you win a primary in the Democratic Party is you try to attack as far as possible to the left.

And, you know, it even took some party intervention to prevent Bernie Sanders from being the Democratic nominee in four years ago.

I'm not sure, you know, despite this wave of populist sentiment that on the left is very well documented, it's not clear the American people are really ready to vote for what is actually asset expropriation.

And, you know, there are many legal arguments why this may well not be constitutional.

And there are just also many practical arguments that I think people will listen to.

You know, people who are small business owners, who own farmland, they would be subject to this at that kind of threshold or slightly lower, but something that's definitely within the sights of the people proposing these policies.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.