Skip to main content
Constitution of California

Constitution of California

ConstitutionWikipedia

Search complete. 40 mentions across 30 episodes found for "Constitution of California".

Oct 9, 2026

John FleischmanSOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
34:22
There is language in both of these measures that if these measures pass, and the billionaire tax passes, would kill the billionaire tax.
John FleischmanSOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
34:31
There's a, a, in the California State Constitution, there's a provision that says that if two measures are on the ballot at the same time, but they have conflicting provisions in even part of it, the one that gets the most votes gets enacted, and the one that gets fewer votes does not, even if technically both of them got over 50% of the vote.
John FleischmanSOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
34:50
Currently, right now, Propositions 41 and 42 are polling higher than the no vote on, th- than the yes vote on, on, on Prop 40.
John FleischmanSOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
34:59
Uh, Sergey Brin, uh, the, one of the billionaires who's heavily impacted, spent a lot of money to put these two measures on the ballot, and in and of themselves they do great things.
John FleischmanGUEST
34:52
There's language in both of these measures that if these measures pass, and the billionaire tax passes, would kill the billionaire tax.
John FleischmanGUEST
35:01
There's a, a, in the California State Constitution, there's a provision that says that if two measures are on the ballot at the same time, but they have conflicting provisions in even part of it, the one that gets the most votes gets enacted, and the one that gets fewer votes does not, even if technically both of them got over 50% of the vote.
John FleischmanGUEST
35:20
Currently, right now, Propositions 41 and 42 are polling higher than the no vote on...
John FleischmanGUEST
35:26
Th- than the yes vote on, on, on Prop 40.
Larry ElderHOST
5:41
They said it was undemocratic.
Larry ElderHOST
5:44
Undemocratic? It's in the California Constitution.
Larry ElderHOST
5:55
By then, Trump's remarks, writes the LA Times, had already drawn fierce condemnation from California leaders, including Republican Jim Desmond A Navy vet running in a highly competitive race that is key to helping Republicans retain control of Congress.
Larry ElderHOST
6:08
Here's what Desmond said, "I vehemently disagree with President Trump's comments.
Larry ElderHOST
5:41
They said it was undemocratic.
Larry ElderHOST
5:44
Undemocratic? It's in the California Constitution.
Larry ElderHOST
5:55
By then, Trump remarks, writes the LA Times, had already drawn fierce condemnation from California leaders, including Republican Jim Desmond A Navy vet running in a highly competitive race that is key to helping Republicans retain control of Congress.
Larry ElderHOST
6:08
Here's what Desmond said, "I vehemently disagree with President Trump's comments.
Philip DubéGUEST
42:03
And when they were convicted, because of that opinion, the state Supreme Court heard a, a petition on a writ of habeas corpus from counsel for the Mansons and set aside the death verdicts.
Philip DubéGUEST
42:17
And apparently the California State Constitution was in accord And then of course, I think it was five or six years later when all the states got their act together to rewrite the death penalty statutes so that they were more uniformly and even-handed, uh, even-handedly applied, they were able to reinstate the death penalty, but not retroactively.
Philip DubéGUEST
42:39
So if you were one of the fortunate people, or condemned, uh, in that window from, like, '71 to '77, your death verdict got commuted to life in prison with parole.
Philip DubéGUEST
42:52
Not without, but with parole.
Randy WangHOST
27:53
And it's very confusing because there's a lot of things on the ballot, and in fact, uh, later this week, we have a very special episode of the Accountability Podcast with John Fleischman talking about everything that is on the ballot, all of these statewide propositions.
Randy WangHOST
28:07
And what you need to know is Prop 41 and 42 are the anti-billionaire tax measures, and the way that the California Constitution is written, if either of those gets more votes than the billionaire tax, it wipes out the billionaire tax.
John PhillipsHOST
28:23
Uh, what's weird to me about the spending among the billionaires is that they're willing to come in heavy on this, on the statewide ballot initiative, but they won't lay the groundwork so there's an organization that's well-funded to fight these things and to cut them off at the pass.
John PhillipsHOST
28:42
So for example, if there was a well-funded California Republican Party that was professionalized, that had different operations in each of the counties that were also professional, if the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association had more money to fight these things, if you had some organization that found Matt Mahans to run in all the big cities where you could beat the DSA at that municipal level, a lot of these problems would be taken care of before it reaches this critical mass, and there's an initiative that could force all of you out of the state on the ballot.
Aharon FriedmanGUEST
21:52
Um, then the other uncertainty is the point you made, is that there's a provision in here that the legislature could amend the BTA, um, and that the, one of the, the, the issues there is that they could amend the BTA if consistent with the purposes of the BTA, and it's very hard to determine what that really means.
Aharon FriedmanGUEST
22:09
So, for example, um, the constitutional protections against certain types of taxation that California has in the California Constitution as a matter of California law, such as Proposition, uh, 13 with regard to property taxes, right? This could be open season on that if the BTA passes.
Aharon FriedmanGUEST
22:27
So it's not just billionaires.
Aharon FriedmanGUEST
22:29
The legislature could take this to circumvent the, uh, basically all the protections in the California Constitution, and w- would a court uphold that and say, "Well, that's consistent with the purposes of BTA"? Very, very hard to say.
Aharon FriedmanGUEST
22:42
Um, but I think Ben could elaborate more on how all this uncertainty, uh, would affect the behavior of Californians who make up a large part of California's income tax base, and whether they might decide to leave.
Will SwaimHOST
22:58
So Ben-
John FleischmanGUEST
34:36
There is language in both of these measures that if these measures pass and the billionaire tax passes, would kill the billionaire tax.
John FleischmanGUEST
34:45
There's a, a, in the California State Constitution, there's a provision that says that if two measures are on the ballot at the same time, but they have conflicting provisions in even part of it, the one that gets the most votes gets enacted, and the one that gets fewer votes does not, even if technically both of them got over 50% of the vote.
John FleischmanGUEST
35:03
Currently, right now, Propositions 41 and 42 are polling higher than the no vote on, th- than the yes vote on, on, on Prop 40.
John FleischmanGUEST
35:13
Uh, Sergey Brin, uh, the, one of the billionaires who's heavily impacted, spent a lot of money to put these two measures on the ballot, and in and of themselves, they do great things.
Randy WangHOST
28:57
And it's very confusing, because there's a lot of things on the ballot, and in fact, uh, later this week we have a very special episode of The Accountability Podcast with John Fleischman talking about everything that is on the ballot, all of these statewide propositions.
Randy WangHOST
29:12
And what you need to know is Prop 41 and 42 are the anti-billionaire tax measures, and the way that the California Constitution is written, if either of those gets more votes than the billionaire tax, it wipes out the billionaire tax.
John PhillipsHOST
29:27
Uh, what's weird to me about the spending among the billionaires is that they're willing to come in heavy on this, on the statewide ballot initiative, but they won't lay the groundwork so there's an organization that's well-funded to fight these things and to cut them off at the pass.
John PhillipsHOST
29:46
So for example, if there was a well-funded California Republican Party that was professionalized, that had different operations in each of the counties that were also professional, if the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association had more money to fight these things, if you had some organization that found Matt Mahanes to run in all the big cities where you could beat the DSA at that municipal level, a lot of these problems would be taken care of before it reaches this critical mass and there's an initiative that could force all of you out of the state on the ballot.
John FleischmanGUEST
33:43
There's a, a...
John FleischmanGUEST
33:44
In the California State Constitution, there's a provision that says that if two measures are on the ballot at the same time, but they have conflicting provisions in even part of it, the one that gets the most votes gets enacted, and the one that gets fewer votes does not, even if technically both of them got over 50% of the vote.
John FleischmanGUEST
34:02
Currently, right now, Propositions 41 and 42 are polling higher than the no vote on...
John FleischmanGUEST
34:08
Th- than the yes vote on, on, on Prop 40.

20 more episodes mention Constitution of California.

Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.