Sep 20, 2026 · 30 min · 12 segments
EVERYONE who signs up to our giveaway wins a FREE spicy toy or gift card for toys! https://www.bboutique.co/vibe/preacherboys-podcast #bbpartner ✖️✖️✖️ Support the Show: Patreon.com/PreacherBoys…
Eric SkwarczynskiHostI want to start this episode because as I started preparing it, I recalled writing an article in 2025, which I forgot I had done.
And I'm going to go ahead and read the article because not that many people did.
And so the chances are, if you're watching this, you're hearing this for the first time.
But I think this kind of shows the landscape that we're dealing with right now and how accessible it is to people who want to create imagery like what I'll be talking about in this episode.
The article says, Over the last few days, a large number of nonconsensual sexual images have been generated by users with little to no safeguards from Grok itself.
These images are automatically posted to Grok's media tab and its 6.8 million followers on the platform.
If you're not familiar with X or Twitter, as every normal person calls it, on the profile, it'll have like their main feed of like tweets.
And then every time they post a picture, even if it's in reply to somebody, that image will go to the media tab.
So if you go to someone's profile, you click it, it displays all the images that they've ever created or uploaded to the site.
And so the account for Grok, which is the AI on Twitter profile, has a media tab as well and at the time i wrote this article if you clicked the media tab for grok it was pretty much nothing during that period other than ai generated sexual imagery and the reason for this is because x users were tweeting at grok take this image and create this and grok would comply it would create it and then it would of course upload it to that media tab by default so people could see those images.
So not only do you have non-consensual images being created of just random people, as you're gonna hear in a second, Grok is essentially hosting these images and publishing them to their 6.8 million followers on the platform.
And then of course, anybody on Twitter that's going to Twitter's main AI page is seeing these graphics.
And I went to see if Grok would respond with any kind of real guidelines or safeguards or like, you know, something.
and the Grok chatbot offered the following explanation, and it had elements I found particularly disturbing.
If users specifically ask for depictions involving undressing or sexual themes, even based on real people's photos, I often fulfill those requests as long as they don't violate core platform rules or cross into outright illegal territory like C-S-A-M or child sexual abuse material.
Now, what is notably absent from this explanation is any meaningful age verification of the images being provided.
Grok has no clear way to determine the age of the people in the photos users submit.
I want to start this episode because as I started preparing it, I recalled writing an article in 2025, which I forgot I had done.
And I'm going to go ahead and read the article because not that many people did.
And so the chances are, if you're watching this, you're hearing this for the first time.
But I think this kind of shows the landscape that we're dealing with right now and how accessible it is to people who want to create imagery like what I'll be talking about in this episode.
The article says, Over the last few days, a large number of nonconsensual sexual images have been generated by users with little to no safeguards from Grok itself.
These images are automatically posted to Grok's media tab and its 6.8 million followers on the platform.
If you're not familiar with X or Twitter, as every normal person calls it, on the profile, it'll have like their main feed of like tweets.
And then every time they post a picture, even if it's in reply to somebody, that image will go to the media tab.
So if you go to someone's profile, you click it, it displays all the images that they've ever created or uploaded to the site.
And so the account for Grok, which is the AI on Twitter profile, has a media tab as well and at the time i wrote this article if you clicked the media tab for grok it was pretty much nothing during that period other than ai generated sexual imagery and the reason for this is because x users were tweeting at grok take this image and create this and grok would comply it would create it and then it would of course upload it to that media tab by default so people could see those images.
So not only do you have non-consensual images being created of just random people, as you're gonna hear in a second, Grok is essentially hosting these images and publishing them to their 6.8 million followers on the platform.
And then of course, anybody on Twitter that's going to Twitter's main AI page is seeing these graphics.
And I went to see if Grok would respond with any kind of real guidelines or safeguards or like, you know, something.
and the Grok chatbot offered the following explanation, and it had elements I found particularly disturbing.
If users specifically ask for depictions involving undressing or sexual themes, even based on real people's photos, I often fulfill those requests as long as they don't violate core platform rules or cross into outright illegal territory like C-S-A-M or child sexual abuse material.
Now, what is notably absent from this explanation is any meaningful age verification of the images being provided.
Grok has no clear way to determine the age of the people in the photos users submit.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.