Oct 20, 2026 · 50 min · 10 segments
In this episode of Placecast, **Nicola Headlam** is joined by **Professor Martin Jones**, Professor Emeritus and former Professor of Human Geography and Vice Chancellor at Staffordshire University, to…
I keep on thinking, actually, I was talking to a colleague who worked a lot on the pottery recently, and we were laughing about, we're at placemaking, can you do it on a rainy night in Stoke? The challenge is, it isn't for, in a sense, well, we can talk about this for a million years, but the big trick of Manchesterism was for the ten boroughs to put apart their sense of natural competition, loathing and pursuit of cash.
and buy into a banner that they were content to march behind for most purposes and discuss.
Where it gets pokey, of course, is when you come to things like spatial frameworks, actual planning powers policy.
Actually, even the 10 boroughs haven't managed to march in step to create a spatial development perspective for the 10 boroughs.
There's a couple of boroughs that are have stepped back from the actual spatial plan.
And again, that's partly the beauty of a very plastic Manchesterism, where it behooves them to collaborate, they do.
But also, and again, my PhD is 15 years old, but you can draw maps that say that the proper economic geography or the sensible economic geography for governing the conurbation is much more of a sort of cell neck, a sort of melted Lancashire, because there's far more prosperity to the south into Cheshire than there is in the 10 borough solution.
And as you described, in that more sort of Dorian Massey sense, Manchester identity, is an attack brand, as it were, but actually in terms of the harder powers, it is much harder to put them into those different baskets.
So rather than this being a kind of side thing at the RGS or wherever, I think this is coming to the main foyer of domestic politics.
Yeah, I would highlight listeners to the recent City Ready paper on institutional thickness by Ang Institutional thick and institutional thickness, as you know, was a body of literature whereby, you know, you've got the presence of institutions, but you've got the regulation of rogue behavior.
I hear everybody agrees externally for political purposes that there is something you can call Manchester, a greater Manchester city region.
I keep on thinking, actually, I was talking to a colleague who worked a lot on the pottery recently, and we were laughing about, we're at placemaking, can you do it on a rainy night in Stoke? The challenge is, it isn't for, in a sense, well, we can talk about this for a million years, but the big trick of Manchesterism was for the ten boroughs to put apart their sense of natural competition, loathing and pursuit of cash.
and buy into a banner that they were content to march behind for most purposes and discuss.
Where it gets pokey, of course, is when you come to things like spatial frameworks, actual planning powers policy.
Actually, even the 10 boroughs haven't managed to march in step to create a spatial development perspective for the 10 boroughs.
There's a couple of boroughs that are have stepped back from the actual spatial plan.
And again, that's partly the beauty of a very plastic Manchesterism, where it behooves them to collaborate, they do.
But also, and again, my PhD is 15 years old, but you can draw maps that say that the proper economic geography or the sensible economic geography for governing the conurbation is much more of a sort of cell neck, a sort of melted Lancashire, because there's far more prosperity to the south into Cheshire than there is in the 10 borough solution.
And as you described, in that more sort of Dorian Massey sense, Manchester identity, is an attack brand, as it were, but actually in terms of the harder powers, it is much harder to put them into those different baskets.
So rather than this being a kind of side thing at the RGS or wherever, I think this is coming to the main foyer of domestic politics.
Yeah, I would highlight listeners to the recent City Ready paper on institutional thickness by Ang Institutional thick and institutional thickness, as you know, was a body of literature whereby, you know, you've got the presence of institutions, but you've got the regulation of rogue behavior.
I hear everybody agrees externally for political purposes that there is something you can call Manchester, a greater Manchester city region.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.