Aug 26, 2026 · 52 min · 14 segments
A career in financial regulation offers far more opportunities than many examiners realize. In this episode of *In the Loop*, hosts Kareeme Tucker and…
Kelly LammersGuest
Susannah MarshallGuest
Rhoshunda KellyGuest
Kareeme TuckerHost
Derek StormsHost
Talk to me a little bit about what early challenges did you face that have really shaped your confidence or even your resilience as examiners today and as leaders today?

Two things coming up quick mind, and one is that I think that is still a challenge today for all examiners, is that you're youth.

Especially if you're coming right out of a college degree early in your career, first career choice.

You're sitting in a room, uh, with your peers, uh, at the end of a boardroom table telling a group of very tenured, experienced professionals what they may or may not have done right or what they need to do better.

And although I didn't experience any challenges in that regard per se, it was not insignificant that I was in a career field that, um, there was not a lot of people that, that were a young female starting out and certainly not creating a long-term career.

I think youth, I think there is a dynamic of, um, male-driven feel for bank- banking, but also for supervision.

But I'll, I'll say this too, one thing I've noticed, at least in my career, is that a lot of really good examiners are introverts, and they work really, really well in, in kind of the analytical and kind of getting into the weeds and dissecting.

But the interacting, the communicating, the engagement, I think that's a little bit of a challenge in introductory or training years as an examiner.

I don't think I spoke the first year that I worked in the field with anybody.

But yeah, I could say that that was, that was one of the challenges that I saw outside of the youth and, and the kind of the gender disparity in the, in the, um, in that piece.

And, and as we talk about those challenges moving forward, it all comes down to their, our ability to work with and adapt to explaining what we saw.

What an examiner sees, i- i- is incredibly important to the entire office, to the entire system.

And yet as we're either experienced and believe we've seen things, which unfortunately puts blinders in front of us, or those that come in with a new perspective, come back from a new school, it all changes that relevance and how do we communicate what we've seen new.

Uh, technology say it's data-driven, and yet a great deal of us will all have y- have a story about how human-driven the art of examining is.

So it's all a matter of explaining where you're at and when you're at, because sometimes the when is a key part of seeing a part of the culture that the other people around the table just aren't seeing at that moment in time.

Talk to me a little bit about what early challenges did you face that have really shaped your confidence or even your resilience as examiners today and as leaders today?

Two things coming up quick mind, and one is that I think that is still a challenge today for all examiners, is that you're youth.

Especially if you're coming right out of a college degree early in your career, first career choice.

You're sitting in a room, uh, with your peers, uh, at the end of a boardroom table telling a group of very tenured, experienced professionals what they may or may not have done right or what they need to do better.

And although I didn't experience any challenges in that regard per se, it was not insignificant that I was in a career field that, um, there was not a lot of people that, that were a young female starting out and certainly not creating a long-term career.

I think youth, I think there is a dynamic of, um, male-driven feel for bank- banking, but also for supervision.

But I'll, I'll say this too, one thing I've noticed, at least in my career, is that a lot of really good examiners are introverts, and they work really, really well in, in kind of the analytical and kind of getting into the weeds and dissecting.

But the interacting, the communicating, the engagement, I think that's a little bit of a challenge in introductory or training years as an examiner.

I don't think I spoke the first year that I worked in the field with anybody.

But yeah, I could say that that was, that was one of the challenges that I saw outside of the youth and, and the kind of the gender disparity in the, in the, um, in that piece.

And, and as we talk about those challenges moving forward, it all comes down to their, our ability to work with and adapt to explaining what we saw.

What an examiner sees, i- i- is incredibly important to the entire office, to the entire system.

And yet as we're either experienced and believe we've seen things, which unfortunately puts blinders in front of us, or those that come in with a new perspective, come back from a new school, it all changes that relevance and how do we communicate what we've seen new.

Uh, technology say it's data-driven, and yet a great deal of us will all have y- have a story about how human-driven the art of examining is.

So it's all a matter of explaining where you're at and when you're at, because sometimes the when is a key part of seeing a part of the culture that the other people around the table just aren't seeing at that moment in time.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.