Oct 16, 2026 · 1 hr 31 min · 11 segments
It began with an invitation to a conference in Lebanon. Young Yemeni activists believed they were going to discuss democracy and the Arab Spring. But behind the scenes, according to one of those…
Baraa ShibanGuest
Negar MojtahediHost
Shahin MilaniGuest
Brandon SilverGuest
Tatyana EatwellGuest
We are waking up now pretty much every morning to yet another execution inside of Iran.

Ali Sina Mossazafi, a 38-year-old manton maker and musician, was executed Wednesday morning.

Human rights organizations had warned his execution was imminent and raised allegations that he had been forced to confess.

And as the Islamic Republic's executing prisoners, it is also going after the lawyers who are there to defend them Prominent human rights lawyer, Amir Salar Davudi, was arrested just days after his client, a January protester, Alireza Sepahhi, was executed.

Iranian authorities say Davudi's publication of a recording of Sepahhi's prison wedding was among the reasons for his arrest.

According to Henan, at least 135 lawyers have faced judicial and/or security measures over the past year, and things have really, uh, ramped up after the January protests.

So why is the Islamic Republic intensifying its crackdown on independent lawyers right now? Is it trying to prevent prisoners from getting any kind of defense or silence those who could expose abuses and preserve evidence for future accountability? Joining me now are three distinguished guests on our panel today.

We've got Tatiana Eatwell, a UK-based international human rights barrister who was part of a team, legal team representing Nazanin Ratcliffe.

Roya Boroumand, who's the co-founder and executive director of the Boroumand Center for Human Rights in Iran.

She has spent decades documenting political executions and human rights abuses.

And Brandon Silver, a Canadian international human rights lawyer, director of policy and projects at the Raoul Wallenberg Center for Human Rights, and chief advisor to former Canadian Justice Minister Irwin Cotler.

As we said, we're waking up to these executions every morning inside of Iran.

At the same time, the Islamic Republic is arresting the lawyers who represent the political prisoners, but there's something striking about how the regime operates.

You know, they even have these trumped-up criminal charges, confesses, confessions rather, and judicial rulings.

So why does the Islamic Republic still need the appearance rather, of legality to carry out their repression? What political purpose, um, does a death sentence issued by a court serve that an extrajudicial killing would not for a brutal regime like the Islamic Republic?

It's a good question, and hello, and thank you, um, for inviting me, um, on here.

It's a real privilege to be speaking with Roya and Brandon as well, um, on this deeply distressing topic.

Um, my view is, and you see it not only in Iran but o- in other autocratic and authoritarian regimes, is that actually the use or sort of the thin veil of a, uh, working justice system and, and rule of law is used in order to justify and legitimize, um, repressive tactics locally, internally.

It's not in order to show the international community that the rule of law is functioning well in Iran.

It is in order to demonstrate to, to, to a cohort or message to a cohort within, um, Iran and the population, um, or justify their actions, um, through the legal, um, process.

We are waking up now pretty much every morning to yet another execution inside of Iran.

Ali Sina Mossazafi, a 38-year-old manton maker and musician, was executed Wednesday morning.

Human rights organizations had warned his execution was imminent and raised allegations that he had been forced to confess.

And as the Islamic Republic's executing prisoners, it is also going after the lawyers who are there to defend them Prominent human rights lawyer, Amir Salar Davudi, was arrested just days after his client, a January protester, Alireza Sepahhi, was executed.

Iranian authorities say Davudi's publication of a recording of Sepahhi's prison wedding was among the reasons for his arrest.

According to Henan, at least 135 lawyers have faced judicial and/or security measures over the past year, and things have really, uh, ramped up after the January protests.

So why is the Islamic Republic intensifying its crackdown on independent lawyers right now? Is it trying to prevent prisoners from getting any kind of defense or silence those who could expose abuses and preserve evidence for future accountability? Joining me now are three distinguished guests on our panel today.

We've got Tatiana Eatwell, a UK-based international human rights barrister who was part of a team, legal team representing Nazanin Ratcliffe.

Roya Boroumand, who's the co-founder and executive director of the Boroumand Center for Human Rights in Iran.

She has spent decades documenting political executions and human rights abuses.

And Brandon Silver, a Canadian international human rights lawyer, director of policy and projects at the Raoul Wallenberg Center for Human Rights, and chief advisor to former Canadian Justice Minister Irwin Cotler.

As we said, we're waking up to these executions every morning inside of Iran.

At the same time, the Islamic Republic is arresting the lawyers who represent the political prisoners, but there's something striking about how the regime operates.

You know, they even have these trumped-up criminal charges, confesses, confessions rather, and judicial rulings.

So why does the Islamic Republic still need the appearance rather, of legality to carry out their repression? What political purpose, um, does a death sentence issued by a court serve that an extrajudicial killing would not for a brutal regime like the Islamic Republic?

It's a good question, and hello, and thank you, um, for inviting me, um, on here.

It's a real privilege to be speaking with Roya and Brandon as well, um, on this deeply distressing topic.

Um, my view is, and you see it not only in Iran but o- in other autocratic and authoritarian regimes, is that actually the use or sort of the thin veil of a, uh, working justice system and, and rule of law is used in order to justify and legitimize, um, repressive tactics locally, internally.

It's not in order to show the international community that the rule of law is functioning well in Iran.

It is in order to demonstrate to, to, to a cohort or message to a cohort within, um, Iran and the population, um, or justify their actions, um, through the legal, um, process.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.