Ira JacobsonHost
Robert GishGuest
Paul MartinGuest
emphasize here is that there have been many HPV treatment guidelines, either by region or by society or a combination of the two.


And you can see that as opposed to the 20,000 cutoff, which I think the ASLD intended to be for HPE-AG positive patients, there's really a trend to make 2,000 the threshold for initiation treatment.

And there remains some controversy, but ALT, twice the upper limit of normal as a threshold for treatment, still reflected in the ASLD guideline.

really is being simplified by many around the world, both officially and in practice, to simply saying that ALT, greater than the upper limit of normal, should be the inflection point.


I have included some text on the right to give you an idea of some of the differences amongst these.

And that's because human beings who differ from each other are making up these guidelines.

The two most recent ones that emerged just this year are from the Asia-Pacific group and from Korea.


So they also have ALT simply elevated, but they define their upper limit of normal as a 40.

And we're not gonna get into the intricacies of that, but perhaps that's a bit higher than most of the other societies or groups have proposed.

Independent of ALT, we have risk factors that come into the picture when we talk about these guidelines.

So any liver fibrosis might supplant, for example, the requirement that the ALT be above the upper limit of normal, whatever you choose that to be.


People are more and more interested in the interaction between hepatic steatosis and hepatitis B.

And it increasingly seems that the natural history of hepatitis C can be adversely affected by the presence of steatotic liver disease.

emphasize here is that there have been many HPV treatment guidelines, either by region or by society or a combination of the two.


And you can see that as opposed to the 20,000 cutoff, which I think the ASLD intended to be for HPE-AG positive patients, there's really a trend to make 2,000 the threshold for initiation treatment.

And there remains some controversy, but ALT, twice the upper limit of normal as a threshold for treatment, still reflected in the ASLD guideline.

really is being simplified by many around the world, both officially and in practice, to simply saying that ALT, greater than the upper limit of normal, should be the inflection point.


I have included some text on the right to give you an idea of some of the differences amongst these.

And that's because human beings who differ from each other are making up these guidelines.

The two most recent ones that emerged just this year are from the Asia-Pacific group and from Korea.


So they also have ALT simply elevated, but they define their upper limit of normal as a 40.

And we're not gonna get into the intricacies of that, but perhaps that's a bit higher than most of the other societies or groups have proposed.

Independent of ALT, we have risk factors that come into the picture when we talk about these guidelines.

So any liver fibrosis might supplant, for example, the requirement that the ALT be above the upper limit of normal, whatever you choose that to be.


People are more and more interested in the interaction between hepatic steatosis and hepatitis B.

And it increasingly seems that the natural history of hepatitis C can be adversely affected by the presence of steatotic liver disease.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.