Y Yevamos 64

Mishnah had spoken about discussions of Gioras and Shifcha and brothers that are semi-related, but if they're not paternally related, remember the Isser of Eshes Ach, The mitzvah, I should say, of Yibam only applies by paternal brothers.

The isser might apply to maternal brothers, but the mitzvah is only by paternal.

And that's why the Mishnah said that whether the brothers are born after their mother, before the mother converts, so they're both non-Jewish, they both convert with the mother, or even if one of the brothers is born after the mother converts, or one of them is born after, but was impregnated before the geras took place, he's not related to his father, So then there's no mitzvah of Yibam either.

That's what the Mishnah had said.

And the Mishnah also said, the same thing applies to a Shifcha as well.

So the Gemara just clarifies when it says, even before that, I'm sorry, before that Rabbi Pinchas were up to.

I think we're up to Rabbi Pinchas.

Some say this shouldn't be Rabbi Yossi because it's not the same name.

Some say it's Rabbi Yossi.

Either way, the Bryce says that in Eved, that's Wow, so doesn't that reflect that there is Yichus to an Eved? So Gemara says, is this true? How do we Darshan the Pzukim? The Pazek at the beginning of Sefer Vayikra.

that discusses Karbanos.

Does that include Avadim, that they would be included in Karbanos? Therefore, it includes Avadim even for Yisurei Arayos, that are violated b'shogeg.

Is that what is being included? That's how the sum interpret of Amartaleim.

If you look in the Karban Ha'edah, he has a different shot via Amartaleim.

It's the v'yamart alei hem at the beginning of Arios.

Beginning of Arios and Parshah Zacharimos.

And the Parshah of the Arios, not the beginning of Karbanos.

So the question is, how do you understand this v'yamart alei hem? But either way, Onomar l'chalavim is amris.

The reason that we said the first shot is that what's v'yamart alei hem by Arios can't be referring to Chalavim.

So it's v'yamart alei hem at the beginning of Parshah of Karbanos.

Is it including Avadim in the world of Arios? Or is it including the other Yisurim relating to Jews, which might apply to Avodim too, but not in the world of Arios.

So that's the question.

How do you darshen that? And the Gemara answers, and that's the question of whether he will be chayef chatos for Imo.

And the Gemara just adds, Just like by a regular giores, there's no difference for Hilchas, Yibam, and Chalitza, whether the mother converted to after she had the two babies, two brothers, and therefore they're totally for sure not related, or even if she converted between, meaning after she was impregnated, and then she converted, and then she had one baby, so one baby was born Jewish, and the other one was born fully Jewish, even impregnated Jewish, so too, the same thing, both those cases, they're not related paternally, and therefore there's no mitzvah, so the same thing with shifra, if she was mishachrar, she was mishachraris, after impregnation, And before birth of one of them, so afshivcha, nasa batzad, shenashach rachah, kitzad, shalom nashach rachah, it would apply there too.