Van Leer Institute Series on Ideas
Oct 2, 2026 · 40 min · 11 segments
Most of us use Wikipedia without thinking very much about it. A name comes up in conversation, an argument breaks out, or we suddenly need to know what happened in, for example, 1948—and within…
And when we talk about knowledge, we assume knowledge is intuitive, understandable, that we can trust sources that present themselves as authoritative.
It comes from my studies of gender and gendered relationships to see the place women are positioned in relation to men.
or they say something and nobody listens to, but then someone else, a man, says it, and then everyone says, yes, you're right.
And the politics of knowledge deals with who is considered reliable, who is included in knowledge production, who or what groups or what gender are excluded from knowledge production.
So knowledge, as we see it, even if we are talking about scientific knowledge relating to asking questions and answering them through lab research, before even going to the lab, we ask who are the researchers who participate in the research, who are asked the question and who are excluded.
And we know that the politics of knowledge are extremely important on every level.
Even if we talked about medicine, for example, we understand that lots of the examinations and the tests were were done on men.
So women were excluded and that had severe effects on the medication and the way they were treated.
So it's important to establish the basic fact that knowledge has always a political side that has to be examined.
And when we talk about knowledge, we assume knowledge is intuitive, understandable, that we can trust sources that present themselves as authoritative.
It comes from my studies of gender and gendered relationships to see the place women are positioned in relation to men.
or they say something and nobody listens to, but then someone else, a man, says it, and then everyone says, yes, you're right.
And the politics of knowledge deals with who is considered reliable, who is included in knowledge production, who or what groups or what gender are excluded from knowledge production.
So knowledge, as we see it, even if we are talking about scientific knowledge relating to asking questions and answering them through lab research, before even going to the lab, we ask who are the researchers who participate in the research, who are asked the question and who are excluded.
And we know that the politics of knowledge are extremely important on every level.
Even if we talked about medicine, for example, we understand that lots of the examinations and the tests were were done on men.
So women were excluded and that had severe effects on the medication and the way they were treated.
So it's important to establish the basic fact that knowledge has always a political side that has to be examined.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.