Tell us about the case of Iskandar 323, the lone editor as a source of knowledge bias.

So I thought one interesting way to really follow the line of bias and to understand where it springs from is to take one editor, who was very notorious as a biased editor.

This is an editor that really can shed light on other editors who work in a similar way.

He was finally completely banned from Wikipedia because of his bias.

at the beginning of the year, but until then, he edited for 12 years, close to 12 years, with 25,000 edits, most of them on the topics I mentioned, Israel, the conflict, Jewish history, and about the same amount of edits on talk pages.

That's where people, editors, negotiate the edits.

So this is a veteran editor, very, from his writing, highly educated, very knowledgeable, and with a prominent place within the society, community, they call it, of editors.

touching

Tell us about the case of Iskandar 323, the lone editor as a source of knowledge bias.

So I thought one interesting way to really follow the line of bias and to understand where it springs from is to take one editor, who was very notorious as a biased editor.

This is an editor that really can shed light on other editors who work in a similar way.

He was finally completely banned from Wikipedia because of his bias.

at the beginning of the year, but until then, he edited for 12 years, close to 12 years, with 25,000 edits, most of them on the topics I mentioned, Israel, the conflict, Jewish history, and about the same amount of edits on talk pages.

That's where people, editors, negotiate the edits.

So this is a veteran editor, very, from his writing, highly educated, very knowledgeable, and with a prominent place within the society, community, they call it, of editors.

So what actions should Wikipedia take to reduce the problems you're talking about? And what about LLMs, large language models, AI? What should their policies be? I think