Steven DonzigerGuest
Leonard GoodmanHostPatrick SullivanHost
but let me just ask you about that, sort of the corporate influence over judges.

Because Jimmy Carter famously said, we have a system of legalized bribery in this country.

And but it was always sort of assumed that you've got that basically the bribery applies to the executive branch and the legislative branch, but not to the judicial branch, because the judicial branch, of course, they have lifetime appointments.

And I don't think any case really highlights that as much as your case, where basically they took the side of Chevron.

And of course, like you say, the indigenous people that won this judgment haven't seen a penny.

So I guess my question is, do we have a, because if you have all three branches of government that are basically bought and paid for, then I don't know, people use the word fascism, but that's really the merger of corporations and the state.

I think, you know, look, I think that it's not, out of school to use the word fascism to describe what's happening.

I mean, you could call Trump an autocrat, you can call him an authoritarian, call him a fascist.

I mean, his past Joint Chiefs of Staff said, I looked at this man in the eye, he's got fascism in his heart.

And if you really understand the rise of fascist leaders like Mussolini and Hitler, and other authoritarian leaders like Gaddafi and Berlusconi and Trump and Pinochet in Chile, like you see a playbook.


I mean, when you have a liberal democracy, there's always seeds of fascism that exist, people who believe that democracy's inefficient and that we need strong leaders to run a more efficient society.

And just because you have open fascism doesn't mean you don't have seeds of liberal democracy there.

between how a society that believes in the free markets is going to be governed.

Will it be governed with bedrock principles of democracy, like free speech, rule of law? Or is it gonna be governed by an authoritarian or even a dictator, which is how I believe Trump wants to govern.

but let me just ask you about that, sort of the corporate influence over judges.

Because Jimmy Carter famously said, we have a system of legalized bribery in this country.

And but it was always sort of assumed that you've got that basically the bribery applies to the executive branch and the legislative branch, but not to the judicial branch, because the judicial branch, of course, they have lifetime appointments.

And I don't think any case really highlights that as much as your case, where basically they took the side of Chevron.

And of course, like you say, the indigenous people that won this judgment haven't seen a penny.

So I guess my question is, do we have a, because if you have all three branches of government that are basically bought and paid for, then I don't know, people use the word fascism, but that's really the merger of corporations and the state.

I think, you know, look, I think that it's not, out of school to use the word fascism to describe what's happening.

I mean, you could call Trump an autocrat, you can call him an authoritarian, call him a fascist.

I mean, his past Joint Chiefs of Staff said, I looked at this man in the eye, he's got fascism in his heart.

And if you really understand the rise of fascist leaders like Mussolini and Hitler, and other authoritarian leaders like Gaddafi and Berlusconi and Trump and Pinochet in Chile, like you see a playbook.


I mean, when you have a liberal democracy, there's always seeds of fascism that exist, people who believe that democracy's inefficient and that we need strong leaders to run a more efficient society.

And just because you have open fascism doesn't mean you don't have seeds of liberal democracy there.

between how a society that believes in the free markets is going to be governed.

Will it be governed with bedrock principles of democracy, like free speech, rule of law? Or is it gonna be governed by an authoritarian or even a dictator, which is how I believe Trump wants to govern.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.