The Strength In Numbers Podcast with G. Elliott Morris
Oct 19, 2026 · 1 hr 1 min · 10 segments
Here’s a fun fact: According to economist Nicholas Bloom and coauthors, for every dollar the U.S. Federal Government spends…
Chris, I want to start with something that seems like it happened years ago at this point.
On August 1st of last year, the government jobs report came back, and it came back weak.
It came back so bad that Donald Trump tweeted on his social media account the following.
He says, I was just informed that our country's jobs numbers, and these are in scare quotes, are being produced by a Biden appointee.
all caps there, Dr. Erica McIntyre for the commissioner of labor statistics who faked the jobs numbers before Election Day to try and boost Kamala Harris's chances of victory.
And this is important, right, because the BLS is the agency that produces these jobs numbers and a bunch of other numbers.
And so we're going to talk about that in light of like all this machinery that that generates all this federal data.
represent to you? So the Bureau of Labor Statistics and really the entire federal statistical system has operated as background data infrastructure for our country for several decades and for several different administrations, Republican and Democrat, and they have a very well-earned reputation for working very hard to produce very accurate and very reliable data on our country.
And this was really something of a bright red line of the politicization or the attempted politicization of the statistical data system, where the president was trying to essentially impose his view of how things should be on our understanding of the world.
And I think it's important for people to understand that, you know, we're a country of over 300 million people without these sort of ways to count what's happening.
So these statistical programs, the things like the Bureau of Labor Statistics or the census produces is really the best way we have to understand ourselves as a society and And again, it's it's it's really the first time we've seen that a president has tried to meddle in the system so, so aggressively and so proactively.
The implication being, I want my party in charge of the statistical agency, which would be capital B bad for the country.
I mean, presidents have appointed their own people to run these various agencies, and they have almost always been people who are well-regarded, well-established statisticians or data scientists who, even if they come from a conservative or a progressive sort of background, are first and foremost about trying to produce accurate data and trying to produce accurate information.
And this was very clearly an instance of he didn't care what the data said or what accuracy was.
He wanted it to fit his view of how the world should be rather than what the world actually is.
Chris, I want to start with something that seems like it happened years ago at this point.
On August 1st of last year, the government jobs report came back, and it came back weak.
It came back so bad that Donald Trump tweeted on his social media account the following.
He says, I was just informed that our country's jobs numbers, and these are in scare quotes, are being produced by a Biden appointee.
all caps there, Dr. Erica McIntyre for the commissioner of labor statistics who faked the jobs numbers before Election Day to try and boost Kamala Harris's chances of victory.
And this is important, right, because the BLS is the agency that produces these jobs numbers and a bunch of other numbers.
And so we're going to talk about that in light of like all this machinery that that generates all this federal data.
represent to you? So the Bureau of Labor Statistics and really the entire federal statistical system has operated as background data infrastructure for our country for several decades and for several different administrations, Republican and Democrat, and they have a very well-earned reputation for working very hard to produce very accurate and very reliable data on our country.
And this was really something of a bright red line of the politicization or the attempted politicization of the statistical data system, where the president was trying to essentially impose his view of how things should be on our understanding of the world.
And I think it's important for people to understand that, you know, we're a country of over 300 million people without these sort of ways to count what's happening.
So these statistical programs, the things like the Bureau of Labor Statistics or the census produces is really the best way we have to understand ourselves as a society and And again, it's it's it's really the first time we've seen that a president has tried to meddle in the system so, so aggressively and so proactively.
The implication being, I want my party in charge of the statistical agency, which would be capital B bad for the country.
I mean, presidents have appointed their own people to run these various agencies, and they have almost always been people who are well-regarded, well-established statisticians or data scientists who, even if they come from a conservative or a progressive sort of background, are first and foremost about trying to produce accurate data and trying to produce accurate information.
And this was very clearly an instance of he didn't care what the data said or what accuracy was.
He wanted it to fit his view of how the world should be rather than what the world actually is.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.