Oct 15, 2026 · 54 min · 19 segments
Co-Hosts Jane Silk and Joseph Patterson bring you news of the week and hot takes from expert guests in this hour of political power!
Frank DeVitoGuestBut here it's just like, okay, here's the intro to the show, and now we just dip you right in, push you right over into the s- into the cold water of the pool, you know? So something that's, uh, bugged me this week is that, uh, Minnesota, what they've done for abortion, they've done infanticide now, and it's been celebrated as a feminist achievement, infanticide.
But what exactly do I mean? What's going on here? Now, this is former Democrat, uh, vice presidential pick, the guy who pardoned a pedophile earlier this year, and he's the one who signed it into law while a bunch of women were standing around him clapping and cheering and happy and everything.
Off by seven months, but maybe she can fudge the numbers or say abortion wasn't available, so she just took her time doing it.
And this law does allow, if, uh, you want an abortion-- Basically what it is, is if you want an abortion but the baby comes out alive, the doctors can kill it even after it's outside the womb.
Now, we were told abortion is reproductive health, so what exactly about a child six feet away from the mother poses a threat to the mother's reproductive health? Because women are celebrating the doctor executing their infant when it's a great distance from the body.
If sacrificing a baby to woman's new god, Moloch, after the baby is outside the body is for reproductive health, what else will they justify? Killing the husband? Killing the child at any age? Killing a conservative who wants to stop this? Where will this bloodlust end in the name of reproductive health? How do you justify, ag- again, how do you say, "Oh, it's for the protection of their health.
What are you doing? And that's how this whole abortion thing was sold to us to begin with.
Oh, safe, legal, rare for the mother's health or instances of rape and incest.
Well, uh, at, at the point that the child is born, some of that goes away, and especially if the child is outside the womb, the health is no longer an issue, but it is still being described as reproductive care, reproductive health.
But this conversation about when the child is considered born, you know, that goes all the way back to at least 26, 27, 28 years.
I forgot it-- when in the late '90s it happened, but it was Barbara Boxer, a Democrat, uh, congresswoman, and Rick Santorum, a Republican congressman, who were argu- arguing over, you know, when is the child born.
And Santorum just asked Barbara Boxer, "When is the child born?" She's just like, "The mother knows when the child is born." And Santorum's like, "Okay, now is it considered born with a, with a toe in the womb, with-- and a toe still inside? With a foot still inside? At what point is it still considered not born?" And the only answer was, "The mother knows.
And so it's just based on feeling, I guess? Vibes? Is that, is that really what we want our laws based on? Again, at what point then does this, uh-- do we put limits here if reproductive health is considered, you know, aborting a child after the child is outside the womb, after the child is alive, living on its own outside the womb? You know, at what-- Oh, it's still dependent on the mother for all sorts of things.
Okay, well, that child's gonna be dependent on the mother for probably like 15, 16 years.
That's about the time it takes before an, a human can become somewhat independent.
But, uh, is that gonna mean that they can just, uh, take the child in for euthanasia any time in the first 16 years of life? Or is it because the child can't vote? Maybe that's why they don't care about it.
Well, no, I'm not gonna get vulgar there in, uh, about what I was about to say about, uh, dismissing women in general.
But here it's just like, okay, here's the intro to the show, and now we just dip you right in, push you right over into the s- into the cold water of the pool, you know? So something that's, uh, bugged me this week is that, uh, Minnesota, what they've done for abortion, they've done infanticide now, and it's been celebrated as a feminist achievement, infanticide.
But what exactly do I mean? What's going on here? Now, this is former Democrat, uh, vice presidential pick, the guy who pardoned a pedophile earlier this year, and he's the one who signed it into law while a bunch of women were standing around him clapping and cheering and happy and everything.
Off by seven months, but maybe she can fudge the numbers or say abortion wasn't available, so she just took her time doing it.
And this law does allow, if, uh, you want an abortion-- Basically what it is, is if you want an abortion but the baby comes out alive, the doctors can kill it even after it's outside the womb.
Now, we were told abortion is reproductive health, so what exactly about a child six feet away from the mother poses a threat to the mother's reproductive health? Because women are celebrating the doctor executing their infant when it's a great distance from the body.
If sacrificing a baby to woman's new god, Moloch, after the baby is outside the body is for reproductive health, what else will they justify? Killing the husband? Killing the child at any age? Killing a conservative who wants to stop this? Where will this bloodlust end in the name of reproductive health? How do you justify, ag- again, how do you say, "Oh, it's for the protection of their health.
What are you doing? And that's how this whole abortion thing was sold to us to begin with.
Oh, safe, legal, rare for the mother's health or instances of rape and incest.
Well, uh, at, at the point that the child is born, some of that goes away, and especially if the child is outside the womb, the health is no longer an issue, but it is still being described as reproductive care, reproductive health.
But this conversation about when the child is considered born, you know, that goes all the way back to at least 26, 27, 28 years.
I forgot it-- when in the late '90s it happened, but it was Barbara Boxer, a Democrat, uh, congresswoman, and Rick Santorum, a Republican congressman, who were argu- arguing over, you know, when is the child born.
And Santorum just asked Barbara Boxer, "When is the child born?" She's just like, "The mother knows when the child is born." And Santorum's like, "Okay, now is it considered born with a, with a toe in the womb, with-- and a toe still inside? With a foot still inside? At what point is it still considered not born?" And the only answer was, "The mother knows.
And so it's just based on feeling, I guess? Vibes? Is that, is that really what we want our laws based on? Again, at what point then does this, uh-- do we put limits here if reproductive health is considered, you know, aborting a child after the child is outside the womb, after the child is alive, living on its own outside the womb? You know, at what-- Oh, it's still dependent on the mother for all sorts of things.
Okay, well, that child's gonna be dependent on the mother for probably like 15, 16 years.
That's about the time it takes before an, a human can become somewhat independent.
But, uh, is that gonna mean that they can just, uh, take the child in for euthanasia any time in the first 16 years of life? Or is it because the child can't vote? Maybe that's why they don't care about it.
Well, no, I'm not gonna get vulgar there in, uh, about what I was about to say about, uh, dismissing women in general.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.