Aug 26, 2026 · 1 hr 45 min · 14 segments
*This is the second episode in a multi-part series called 'Compute in Australia'. Series announcement* here*. More episodes to follow over the…
Janet EganGuestJoe WalkerHostSo you've been in Australia for the last few weeks speaking almost exclusively with Australians.
When you go back to Washington, tell me how you'll summarize your trip and what you've learned to friends.
So for example, is there anything that surprised you about how Australian policymakers are thinking about compute or AI in general? Any differences that you've noticed between how US policymakers and Australian policymakers are thinking about those topics?

I think the first thing that is so distinct between Washington, DC and Australia is how seriously people take AI.

Um, again and again, I found myself having conversations where I've assumed that people think AI is going to be a big deal, and so I've started the conversation there and find myself having to go back and retrace earlier discussions to say, "Oh, okay, here is where the pace of progress is heading.

Here is, like, the evidence that we're continuing to see massive breakthroughs, and we haven't yet hit a wall, and here is the evidence that the recipes we have for continuing to improve capabilities are continuing to bear fruit.

That's very str- It would be odd if someone said, "Oh, I don't think AI is a big deal.

Oh, I think it's just hype." Um, but the amount of times I've been asked in the Australian context of, "Wait, isn't it just a bubble?" Like, "Surely AI is just all hype and the market-- Like, the companies are talking themselves up," that is a really big, uh, juxtaposition between the two different, yeah, policy landscapes.

What surprised me in the positive way, though, has been how rapidly Australia's been moving to understand and grapple with these issues.


Um, we've seen the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet set up a new AI task force.

We've seen a growing number of policymakers express urgency at addressing these issues.

So I think we're on the right trend, but I do think that there are a lot of very senior people in sen- like, in positions in government who still aren't grappling with the realities of AI progress.

Um, one theory I have for this is that it's very easy to appear knowledgeable and be skeptical, but it's actually very costly or hard to be knowledgeable and engaged in the issues.

Particularly if you're, like, a leading economist in your field, or you're a, like, a thought leader in your industry and someone is asking you for takes on AI, it's a cheap and easy take to have to say, "Look, I'm not sure this is a really big issue.

I'm a skeptic." It's a much harder thing to do to sound really knowledgeable and informed and engage on those issues.
So you've been in Australia for the last few weeks speaking almost exclusively with Australians.
When you go back to Washington, tell me how you'll summarize your trip and what you've learned to friends.
So for example, is there anything that surprised you about how Australian policymakers are thinking about compute or AI in general? Any differences that you've noticed between how US policymakers and Australian policymakers are thinking about those topics?

I think the first thing that is so distinct between Washington, DC and Australia is how seriously people take AI.

Um, again and again, I found myself having conversations where I've assumed that people think AI is going to be a big deal, and so I've started the conversation there and find myself having to go back and retrace earlier discussions to say, "Oh, okay, here is where the pace of progress is heading.

Here is, like, the evidence that we're continuing to see massive breakthroughs, and we haven't yet hit a wall, and here is the evidence that the recipes we have for continuing to improve capabilities are continuing to bear fruit.

That's very str- It would be odd if someone said, "Oh, I don't think AI is a big deal.

Oh, I think it's just hype." Um, but the amount of times I've been asked in the Australian context of, "Wait, isn't it just a bubble?" Like, "Surely AI is just all hype and the market-- Like, the companies are talking themselves up," that is a really big, uh, juxtaposition between the two different, yeah, policy landscapes.

What surprised me in the positive way, though, has been how rapidly Australia's been moving to understand and grapple with these issues.


Um, we've seen the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet set up a new AI task force.

We've seen a growing number of policymakers express urgency at addressing these issues.

So I think we're on the right trend, but I do think that there are a lot of very senior people in sen- like, in positions in government who still aren't grappling with the realities of AI progress.

Um, one theory I have for this is that it's very easy to appear knowledgeable and be skeptical, but it's actually very costly or hard to be knowledgeable and engaged in the issues.

Particularly if you're, like, a leading economist in your field, or you're a, like, a thought leader in your industry and someone is asking you for takes on AI, it's a cheap and easy take to have to say, "Look, I'm not sure this is a really big issue.

I'm a skeptic." It's a much harder thing to do to sound really knowledgeable and informed and engage on those issues.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.