Oct 13, 2026 · 34 min · 10 segments
*Watch the interview or read the transcript above (or on* YouTube*). Listen to the conversation on*…
Alexander RussoHost
holly we're here to talk about how you're making it work uh from a non-traditional platform and a non-traditional setting and i'm so fascinated but before we get into that can we talk for a little bit about ed tech and ai coverage because i realized as i was prepping for this and I should have warned you, I apologize, that we had talked early in the summer and you had said some really interesting things, no surprise, about EdTech coverage and the possibility of sensationalism.

The gist, I'm paraphrasing, was that maybe people were only seeing or exaggerating the challenges or downsides of EdTech and they weren't really getting at the nuance.
And some recent things have happened very recently in the last few days that I think LA Unified said no AI in classes up to eighth grade.
New York City just said absolutely no generative AI in classes up to eighth grade.
because now it looks like it's not just parents and a group of angry teachers pushing back.
It looks like it's the government, it's policymakers who are pushing back on too much tech in classrooms.

I thought you were saying that maybe the journalists were jumping on a bandwagon and getting in a hypercritical blood in the water kind of mode.

And again, like you said, New York City just announced, LA has announced some things recently.

Is the vibe, in terms of the journalism coverage, and then we'll go on to the things we're supposed to go on to, is the, do you still worry, or maybe I misunderstood you months ago, do you still worry about the coverage being overheated, to use a polite term?
Yeah, I mean, I do still worry about that because I think that we're still not getting at some of the core questions that the ed tech problem is asking.
And I think that we need better evidence on what the tech is doing, are kids learning when they're using it? What are they using it for? I think I mentioned to you, like, is this something that's the core of your lead instruction is kids on computers or is it something where kids are doing a little extra practice? Those are two totally different scenarios.
And so I do still think journalism needs to be careful because, you know, in talking to teachers, some teachers are saying, hey, technology is actually super helpful.

When I think back and my memory is what my memory is, I can only think of a couple of EdTech stories that told the that really gave the nuance in a really pronounced way.

holly we're here to talk about how you're making it work uh from a non-traditional platform and a non-traditional setting and i'm so fascinated but before we get into that can we talk for a little bit about ed tech and ai coverage because i realized as i was prepping for this and I should have warned you, I apologize, that we had talked early in the summer and you had said some really interesting things, no surprise, about EdTech coverage and the possibility of sensationalism.

The gist, I'm paraphrasing, was that maybe people were only seeing or exaggerating the challenges or downsides of EdTech and they weren't really getting at the nuance.
And some recent things have happened very recently in the last few days that I think LA Unified said no AI in classes up to eighth grade.
New York City just said absolutely no generative AI in classes up to eighth grade.
because now it looks like it's not just parents and a group of angry teachers pushing back.
It looks like it's the government, it's policymakers who are pushing back on too much tech in classrooms.

I thought you were saying that maybe the journalists were jumping on a bandwagon and getting in a hypercritical blood in the water kind of mode.

And again, like you said, New York City just announced, LA has announced some things recently.

Is the vibe, in terms of the journalism coverage, and then we'll go on to the things we're supposed to go on to, is the, do you still worry, or maybe I misunderstood you months ago, do you still worry about the coverage being overheated, to use a polite term?
Yeah, I mean, I do still worry about that because I think that we're still not getting at some of the core questions that the ed tech problem is asking.
And I think that we need better evidence on what the tech is doing, are kids learning when they're using it? What are they using it for? I think I mentioned to you, like, is this something that's the core of your lead instruction is kids on computers or is it something where kids are doing a little extra practice? Those are two totally different scenarios.
And so I do still think journalism needs to be careful because, you know, in talking to teachers, some teachers are saying, hey, technology is actually super helpful.

When I think back and my memory is what my memory is, I can only think of a couple of EdTech stories that told the that really gave the nuance in a really pronounced way.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.