Elizondo in DC & Bledsoe’s “New Knowledge”

Um, so on the Grusch stuff, yep, I've covered that, Stratton's book.

Lou was also asked about, um, what did he think of Martin's question to Burleson some, uh, some weeks ago about where we keep the good stuff.

So where we keep the UFOs, where we keep the, the technology, the, the biologics and stuff, and do we have the good stuff lying around? Lou pauses for a moment, and he's got a little bit of showmanship about him, you know.

Um, and he says, I'll share a quote, but I'm not gonna re-reveal who said it.

He says a person told him that we have technology so advanced that they would be worth losing a war for to stop them getting into enemy hands.

Now, I don't quite understand the thinking or rationale behind that, that you would-- If, if you're, if we're the UK, and we've got a load of UFOs crashed here, um, and we're at war with another country, in what circumstances would you want or be willing to lose the war to retain the technology? I don't, I, I don't see the thinking or logic behind that.

Maybe it's a military thing.

Maybe I'm missing something, okay? But I, I, I didn't quite understand that.

Lou himself, though, says he didn't agree with the sentiment of the person who made it, um, but I just thought it was an interesting quote worth mentioning.

Um, Martin asked him towards the end, "What can we expect in the coming years?" And Lou said there are good people trying to make recommendations as to what the end state of this looks like, what the end state of disclosure, confirmation, how we push this forward, what that actually looks like.

Um, and I think quite often we forget.

We, we see big news when it happens.

We see big announcements.

I'm, I'm privy to some things that are maybe going on and whispers of things in the background, right? But you don't really see it until it comes to fruition or doesn't come to fruition, folks, all right? Um, I, I, I just don't go and s-spell everything I've heard 'cause more often than not, it turns out to be bollocks or nothing happens, right? And I'd rather keep a reputation that, you know, when something happens, I can comment on it or give context, um, than just spread rumors and wild speculations or drop bombshells every two seconds for clicks and engagement, okay? Um, but yeah, Martin Willis says at that point to Lou that he feels at this point we can handle whatever it is.

That's not a statement for me I agree with.

I, I like Martin.

Um, but that statement, and he's not the only person that says it, that we can handle whatever the truth is.

We don't know what the truth is, okay? Jack Nicholson, the whole, "We, we, we, you, you can't handle the truth." We don't know that we can.

We don't know what the ultimate end game would be here and what the whole picture, the bird's-eye view of this whole conversation is.

I-- it's not going to be, for me, a case of that, um, we find out we're not alone in the universe, there are NHI, we've got some craft, there's aliens, right, crack on with your day jobs.

It's gonna be a lot more complex and bigger, and it's gonna take a lot longer to get a lot of the truth out or a lot of the knowledge out to people in the public for me.

I just don't feel in any way, shape, or form someone can make the statement the public can handle it.

We don't know, and I include myself in that, how we could handle it.

Perhaps we get the full gl- disclosure confirmation, and I literally stop the podcast because I have shat my pants at the news and what it means, and I don't want to sit here and record and talk to people.

And that's me just being honest.