Samson Lardy AnyeniniHost
Inusah FuseiniPanelist
Ntim FordjourPanelistLenin Nicholas AnanirjePanelist
Bobby BensonPanelist
John Osai-KwapongPanelistAlexander TsunberimaGuestI mean, did he involve you? The president didn't involve you? The three institutions that are at the port.
revert to you somewhat? As I understand, when they were 13, it was basically meaningless because...
They ended up doing sort of the same thing, and yet it became so bureaucratic, and corruption was so endemic.
Samson, are we saying that if somebody wants to bribe, there's three that are remaining now.
Again, on whether or not they revert to us, they don't revert to us because they have not, on this matter, if they were to be reverted to us, they would have at least prompted us that we've seen something or there's something that we know of.
Because from their argument, they said NACOC would be called in when necessary.
But the question is, who determined that necessary point? Who determines it? At what point will you say that this is the time to go and call NACOC? And who is going to really make that decision? The customs? Or the GSA? Or the FDA? Or who? I mean, tell me.
Who among the agencies or the institutions is supposed to make that pronouncement or decision that it is now time to call NAGOC in to come and assist? Who made that decision? So it was wrong to have done that.
Because having taken that decision, look at the tallness of items that I mentioned to you.
I mean, did he involve you? The president didn't involve you? The three institutions that are at the port.
revert to you somewhat? As I understand, when they were 13, it was basically meaningless because...
They ended up doing sort of the same thing, and yet it became so bureaucratic, and corruption was so endemic.
Samson, are we saying that if somebody wants to bribe, there's three that are remaining now.
Again, on whether or not they revert to us, they don't revert to us because they have not, on this matter, if they were to be reverted to us, they would have at least prompted us that we've seen something or there's something that we know of.
Because from their argument, they said NACOC would be called in when necessary.
But the question is, who determined that necessary point? Who determines it? At what point will you say that this is the time to go and call NACOC? And who is going to really make that decision? The customs? Or the GSA? Or the FDA? Or who? I mean, tell me.
Who among the agencies or the institutions is supposed to make that pronouncement or decision that it is now time to call NAGOC in to come and assist? Who made that decision? So it was wrong to have done that.
Because having taken that decision, look at the tallness of items that I mentioned to you.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.