Hanna DavidGuest
Željko StanojevićHostYour book, Erika Landau's contribution, yes, to the history of gifted education, family characteristics of gifted children, examines gifted children, their families, and differences between boys and girls.

First, that you don't have to examine a child when he or she is five or eight and decide whether he or she is gifted and then decide that that is going to be their fate and expect too much of them.


And many of them were gifted, but they could not pass the language part of the giftedness examinations.

So Erica Landau decided that for these people, for these children, she would use just the quantitative criterion rather than both.

Something else that she did when she noticed that in all tests for ungiftedness, Boys do not do it and girls do not do it as well as boys.

She decided that she would accept girls even if they did not pass according to the rigid criteria.

She did accept them and when they summarized the results of participating at the course and the future, et cetera, making friends, for example, which was very important for her.

She realized that girls did as well as boys, even though their average grades were not as good.

But she did not pretend that boys and girls have the same qualities because this is the main American idea.

Well, it has been the main American thing for, I don't know, since the 50s, because lately the main thing in giftedness is double exceptionality.

But until this century, it was always a thing how to change the tests so that girls will do as well as boys.

And I can still remember that 35 years ago, she came to a conference where I delivered a lecture about the achievements of girls and boys in these tests.
Your book, Erika Landau's contribution, yes, to the history of gifted education, family characteristics of gifted children, examines gifted children, their families, and differences between boys and girls.

First, that you don't have to examine a child when he or she is five or eight and decide whether he or she is gifted and then decide that that is going to be their fate and expect too much of them.


And many of them were gifted, but they could not pass the language part of the giftedness examinations.

So Erica Landau decided that for these people, for these children, she would use just the quantitative criterion rather than both.

Something else that she did when she noticed that in all tests for ungiftedness, Boys do not do it and girls do not do it as well as boys.

She decided that she would accept girls even if they did not pass according to the rigid criteria.

She did accept them and when they summarized the results of participating at the course and the future, et cetera, making friends, for example, which was very important for her.

She realized that girls did as well as boys, even though their average grades were not as good.

But she did not pretend that boys and girls have the same qualities because this is the main American idea.

Well, it has been the main American thing for, I don't know, since the 50s, because lately the main thing in giftedness is double exceptionality.

But until this century, it was always a thing how to change the tests so that girls will do as well as boys.

And I can still remember that 35 years ago, she came to a conference where I delivered a lecture about the achievements of girls and boys in these tests.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.