Somehow we've had another sort of period.
I don't know how long we usually go between these events.
Maybe once a season at least we have this sort of thing.
And I'm usually amongst that crowd.
I quite often am amongst that crowd.
And it's not always for the same reasons.
A lot of people just get outraged by how dare they give an award to the wrong person.
My biggest gripe, honestly, quite often comes down to their reasoning.
The article they write up, the justifications they force Nero to use always strike me as incongruent.
They don't make sense.
And of course, I'm referencing the Donk MVP That should have probably, I mean, most of us in our agreement should have gone to Shiro.
I don't know if we have any naysayers on this call who are actually in a different camp on this debate.
But for me, the frustration always comes down to their justification.
So I just thought we should open it up, start off.
Do either of you have a dissenting opinion, honestly, to that take that it should have gone to Shiro?
I wouldn't say so.
I do believe that he deserved the MVP.
I think he was all in all very consistent when it came down to the entire event.
And it was one of the highest highs that he's had.
The grand final was great.
And I know, I think it was, was it Prof that came out on HLTV confirmed or something else and said that essentially if the grand final was done in three maps, they would have awarded the MVP to Shiro.
the one that's written in the article comes down to kills per round win just as i'm that's what i'm referencing yeah yeah okay
Somehow we've had another sort of period.
I don't know how long we usually go between these events.
Maybe once a season at least we have this sort of thing.
And I'm usually amongst that crowd.
I quite often am amongst that crowd.
And it's not always for the same reasons.
A lot of people just get outraged by how dare they give an award to the wrong person.
My biggest gripe, honestly, quite often comes down to their reasoning.
The article they write up, the justifications they force Nero to use always strike me as incongruent.
They don't make sense.
And of course, I'm referencing the Donk MVP That should have probably, I mean, most of us in our agreement should have gone to Shiro.
I don't know if we have any naysayers on this call who are actually in a different camp on this debate.
But for me, the frustration always comes down to their justification.
So I just thought we should open it up, start off.
Do either of you have a dissenting opinion, honestly, to that take that it should have gone to Shiro?
I wouldn't say so.
I do believe that he deserved the MVP.
I think he was all in all very consistent when it came down to the entire event.
And it was one of the highest highs that he's had.
The grand final was great.
And I know, I think it was, was it Prof that came out on HLTV confirmed or something else and said that essentially if the grand final was done in three maps, they would have awarded the MVP to Shiro.
the one that's written in the article comes down to kills per round win just as i'm that's what i'm referencing yeah yeah okay
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.