Jun 10, 2026 · 54 min · 17 segments
It's the last show of the academic year! David Hale and Andrea Adelson sit down with Bubba Cunningham as his 15-year tenure as North Carolina's Director of Athletics. Plus, John Currie discusses Wake…
Bubba CunninghamGuest
Andrea AdelsonHostDavid HaleHost
John CurrieGuest
Protect College Sports Act, and you can see here this laundry list of things that it hopes to accomplish, creating a national NIL standard, attempting to cap revenue sharing and limit illegitimate NIL, allowing schools to pull media revenue with 75% vote, something obviously the Big Ten and SEC do not want, limits potential for super conferences, creates eligibility transfer rules, limited antitrust protection, does not address employment or collective bargaining, which obviously is a Huge thing.
Well, you know, he's going to be eligible to play even though he bet on his own teams, bet on other teams to reiterate here.
Brendan Sorsby, throughout his career at Indiana and Cincinnati, placed thousands of bets on sports, including 40 on his own team.
And now this judge in Texas, Ken Curry, ruled in Brendan Sorsby's favor, saying the quarterback would suffer irreparable injury he's not allowed to play because of his mental health being affected by this gambling addiction hale um i don't even know where to start here uh i think we've talked a lot about this save college sports act the bigger um news here is the fact that now because the ncaa has opened itself to countless amounts of litigation is in a situation where an athlete bet on games on his own team against his own team in a couple of cases and is now going to be eligible to play what do we make of all this
i mean so much of this is like we made our own beds and i say we not me and you but like everybody else in this uh ridiculous industry um you know you can look at it from the judicial standpoint it's funny because they had this multi-billion dollar settlement in house And the entire point was to create some sort of salary cap certainty and to eliminate so much litigation.
You know, look, there's two teams in this league who sued the ACC to test the grant of rights.
And now we're seeing it happen with what seemed to be prior to this, the single biggest red line in the sand to mix two analogies no one should ever cross.
I think in some ways the best thing for this Save College Football Act, Save College Sports Act is the Soresby ruling, because maybe it at least forces people to push for some sort of rules.
But I think the fact that Texas Tech has been in lockstep supporting Soresby throughout all of this.
goes to underscore the largest problem which is no one wants rules when those rules impact them when it's negative for them then all is up in the air if this was utah's quarterback or ucf's quarterback texas tech would be out there saber rattling with everybody else but because it's Their quarterback that they've invested millions of dollars into, no, no, we need him to play irreparable harm.
Protect College Sports Act, and you can see here this laundry list of things that it hopes to accomplish, creating a national NIL standard, attempting to cap revenue sharing and limit illegitimate NIL, allowing schools to pull media revenue with 75% vote, something obviously the Big Ten and SEC do not want, limits potential for super conferences, creates eligibility transfer rules, limited antitrust protection, does not address employment or collective bargaining, which obviously is a Huge thing.
Well, you know, he's going to be eligible to play even though he bet on his own teams, bet on other teams to reiterate here.
Brendan Sorsby, throughout his career at Indiana and Cincinnati, placed thousands of bets on sports, including 40 on his own team.
And now this judge in Texas, Ken Curry, ruled in Brendan Sorsby's favor, saying the quarterback would suffer irreparable injury he's not allowed to play because of his mental health being affected by this gambling addiction hale um i don't even know where to start here uh i think we've talked a lot about this save college sports act the bigger um news here is the fact that now because the ncaa has opened itself to countless amounts of litigation is in a situation where an athlete bet on games on his own team against his own team in a couple of cases and is now going to be eligible to play what do we make of all this
i mean so much of this is like we made our own beds and i say we not me and you but like everybody else in this uh ridiculous industry um you know you can look at it from the judicial standpoint it's funny because they had this multi-billion dollar settlement in house And the entire point was to create some sort of salary cap certainty and to eliminate so much litigation.
You know, look, there's two teams in this league who sued the ACC to test the grant of rights.
And now we're seeing it happen with what seemed to be prior to this, the single biggest red line in the sand to mix two analogies no one should ever cross.
I think in some ways the best thing for this Save College Football Act, Save College Sports Act is the Soresby ruling, because maybe it at least forces people to push for some sort of rules.
But I think the fact that Texas Tech has been in lockstep supporting Soresby throughout all of this.
goes to underscore the largest problem which is no one wants rules when those rules impact them when it's negative for them then all is up in the air if this was utah's quarterback or ucf's quarterback texas tech would be out there saber rattling with everybody else but because it's Their quarterback that they've invested millions of dollars into, no, no, we need him to play irreparable harm.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.