Sep 29, 2026 · 1 hr 22 min · 17 segments
If there is one topic that has come to dominate this moment, it is artificial intelligence. Is it going to wipe us out? Will I lose my job? Is a data centre going up in my neighbourhood? Why are all…
Toby WalshGuest
Nathan Robertson BallHostAnd one of the things you talk about in the book as well is the comparison to climate change and coming, you know, when our humanity started to learn about implications of, you know, increased greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
And, you know, you sort of referenced 1965 as this important year where there was the opportunity for... humanity and politicians to nip in the bud or act.
Yeah, and you talk about the comparison for artificial intelligence at the moment.
So what do you think is at all feasible from a limits perspective? outside of not so much the intrinsic limits around, you know, the limits to the machine intelligence, the limits to data, the limits to, you know, the ability to build the compute associated with what's working.
But I am really curious because you do also talk about, you use a great example in the book around how trying to get global coordination on something like this as well is extremely difficult.

much global closure, except in one small area, which is maybe the United Nations might get something together around the use of air and warfare.

They've done things around other technologies in warfare, around chemical weapons, biological weapons, clustering munitions, blinding lasers.

So there's actually quite a number of different technologies that we've put together.

Some very modest but nevertheless necessary safeguards in place to try and make warfare a little less barbaric and a little more humane.

And I can imagine that we might be able to do that globally for the use of the way that AI might be used in warfare.

In terms of the AI that's in the rest of our lives, I think the most attractive place, the place that will have the most traction will be if we make our own national regulation.

And we set a very important precedent that's now being picked up by many other nations around the world that changed the conversation in many respects around social media.

Because at the bottom, there is this dangerous truth, which is that humans can be hacked.

i mean we shouldn't be surprised to discover that there's a trillion dollar industry that's predicated on the fact that humans can be packed it's called the advertising industry that it manipulates us and we you know we were sort of comfortable i think with the idea that we might be persuaded to buy one brand of toothpaste over another because you know our teeth were still going to be cleaned and All of the brands of toothpaste were safe.

But now we've got a technology, artificial intelligence, that is going to be incredibly powerful and persuasive and personalized that can hack us in ways that I think will be quite troubling.

And so I think we're going to have to put in some better safeguards, like we have started to do now with social media, to protect us from being manipulated.
And one of the things you talk about in the book as well is the comparison to climate change and coming, you know, when our humanity started to learn about implications of, you know, increased greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
And, you know, you sort of referenced 1965 as this important year where there was the opportunity for... humanity and politicians to nip in the bud or act.
Yeah, and you talk about the comparison for artificial intelligence at the moment.
So what do you think is at all feasible from a limits perspective? outside of not so much the intrinsic limits around, you know, the limits to the machine intelligence, the limits to data, the limits to, you know, the ability to build the compute associated with what's working.
But I am really curious because you do also talk about, you use a great example in the book around how trying to get global coordination on something like this as well is extremely difficult.

much global closure, except in one small area, which is maybe the United Nations might get something together around the use of air and warfare.

They've done things around other technologies in warfare, around chemical weapons, biological weapons, clustering munitions, blinding lasers.

So there's actually quite a number of different technologies that we've put together.

Some very modest but nevertheless necessary safeguards in place to try and make warfare a little less barbaric and a little more humane.

And I can imagine that we might be able to do that globally for the use of the way that AI might be used in warfare.

In terms of the AI that's in the rest of our lives, I think the most attractive place, the place that will have the most traction will be if we make our own national regulation.

And we set a very important precedent that's now being picked up by many other nations around the world that changed the conversation in many respects around social media.

Because at the bottom, there is this dangerous truth, which is that humans can be hacked.

i mean we shouldn't be surprised to discover that there's a trillion dollar industry that's predicated on the fact that humans can be packed it's called the advertising industry that it manipulates us and we you know we were sort of comfortable i think with the idea that we might be persuaded to buy one brand of toothpaste over another because you know our teeth were still going to be cleaned and All of the brands of toothpaste were safe.

But now we've got a technology, artificial intelligence, that is going to be incredibly powerful and persuasive and personalized that can hack us in ways that I think will be quite troubling.

And so I think we're going to have to put in some better safeguards, like we have started to do now with social media, to protect us from being manipulated.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.