The President Above the Law
Here is why presidential immunity changed accountability.
Simone LeeperHost
The principle of a state ruled by laws rather than by individuals goes back millennia.

Aristotle wrote in his Politics more than 2,000 years ago that it is more proper that law should govern than any one of the citizens.

The principle is so familiar that you wouldn't think it would be up for debate.
We have seen these kinds of executives throughout our history.
Abraham Lincoln famously suspended the writ of habeas corpus.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt was viewed by some as tipping into the kind of despotism that he railed against as commander-in-chief during World War II when the United States was fighting Hitler and Mussolini.
But I do think that this particular president is unusual.
He's doing a lot of things that I think we've never seen before, and he's doing it relatively unchecked.
Both Lincoln and Roosevelt had checks in that there was Congress stopping them, there was the courts limiting the expansion of executive power.
Now, I don't think we see the same kinds of checks.
Congress doesn't seem to be bothered when the president does things like, for example, impound the use of federal funds that Congress has allocated for the use of specific federal agencies.

But if the president directs his agencies not to spend appropriated funds, it effectively nullifies Congress.
Congress doesn't seem to be entirely bothered when the president begins to dismantle federal agencies by withholding funding to them.
These are agencies that Congress created, and stands to reason that if Congress created them, only Congress really has the authority to begin to dismantle them, and that the president doing so effectively by withholding funds, strangling the agency, that can't work either.
But yet Congress hasn't really done much to jealously guard what it created.
We also see the courts not really doing much on the shadow docket.
The Supreme Court has effectively allowed the president to continue doing some of these things, even though the shadow docket is meant to be a procedural case management docket where you maintain the status quo while litigation continues in the lower federal courts.

The shadow docket is essentially a fast track to a temporary Supreme Court ruling that arrives unsigned without the benefit of public deliberation.

The government sought relief on the shadow docket only eight times between 2001 and 2017.

The principle of a state ruled by laws rather than by individuals goes back millennia.

Aristotle wrote in his Politics more than 2,000 years ago that it is more proper that law should govern than any one of the citizens.

The principle is so familiar that you wouldn't think it would be up for debate.
We have seen these kinds of executives throughout our history.
Abraham Lincoln famously suspended the writ of habeas corpus.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt was viewed by some as tipping into the kind of despotism that he railed against as commander-in-chief during World War II when the United States was fighting Hitler and Mussolini.
But I do think that this particular president is unusual.
He's doing a lot of things that I think we've never seen before, and he's doing it relatively unchecked.
Both Lincoln and Roosevelt had checks in that there was Congress stopping them, there was the courts limiting the expansion of executive power.
Now, I don't think we see the same kinds of checks.
Congress doesn't seem to be bothered when the president does things like, for example, impound the use of federal funds that Congress has allocated for the use of specific federal agencies.

But if the president directs his agencies not to spend appropriated funds, it effectively nullifies Congress.
Congress doesn't seem to be entirely bothered when the president begins to dismantle federal agencies by withholding funding to them.
These are agencies that Congress created, and stands to reason that if Congress created them, only Congress really has the authority to begin to dismantle them, and that the president doing so effectively by withholding funds, strangling the agency, that can't work either.
But yet Congress hasn't really done much to jealously guard what it created.
We also see the courts not really doing much on the shadow docket.
The Supreme Court has effectively allowed the president to continue doing some of these things, even though the shadow docket is meant to be a procedural case management docket where you maintain the status quo while litigation continues in the lower federal courts.

The shadow docket is essentially a fast track to a temporary Supreme Court ruling that arrives unsigned without the benefit of public deliberation.

The government sought relief on the shadow docket only eight times between 2001 and 2017.
Every episode on Radar is fully transcribed, speaker-labeled, and rich with metadata. Here is a taste of this one. Try Radar for free to see the rest.
3 of 9
The President Above the Law
Here is why presidential immunity changed accountability.
Roberts's Lasting Constitutional Legacy
A chief justice's legacy looks different today.
When Executive Power Becomes Autocracy
Speed can help presidents—and also threaten democracy.
+6 more clips · 11 min 4 sec of audio in all
7 of 25
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
All 9 clips — the highlight moments, each cut as its own audio, with a title and a speaker
All 10 segments — the transcript broken into labeled sections, every ad read marked
All 25 topics — jump to every other episode discussing the same subject
Every related episode — other shows Radar links to this one
No account is needed to search Radar.