Aug 6, 2026 · 1 hr 28 min · 12 segments
Bob and Ali continue to go through this case motion by motion day by day. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at…
Well, here's what we do know, okay? And this is what's disgusting about it.
So the Boston Globe, all right, others' response to Boston Globe media partners' request by father of child victims to restrict display of access to certain evidence and trial exis- exhibits.
If I'm not reading that right, it, it seems like they're trying to, like the media's trying to fight it.
Like they've got some say in this.
Is that what I...
Maybe this is-- Maybe that's not what this means.
I thought it was Tracy had sent me the motion, and I read it, but I can't find where I've read it.
So but it, now that you say that, I remember that one of the requests is that they impound whatever exhibits they put in relating to the children to bar the media from being able to put it out into the public sphere.
I, I absolutely think that should and will happen, for sure.
Is that all the father's asking, or he's asking to limit it in the courtroom somehow?
I'm not sure he has standing for, in the trial, but-
... as we all know, this is one of those cases that they don't need, unless there's something about the manner, you know, the manner in which the, ah, material was applied to the children, we'll just say that, that the, that the state believes proves that she was in her right mind at the time.
Like I, I, I don't see how it could.
But as we all know, in this case, the defendant, Lindsay Clancy, is not denying that she committed the acts.
This is all about whether she is legally, criminally responsible-
...
Well, here's what we do know, okay? And this is what's disgusting about it.
So the Boston Globe, all right, others' response to Boston Globe media partners' request by father of child victims to restrict display of access to certain evidence and trial exis- exhibits.
If I'm not reading that right, it, it seems like they're trying to, like the media's trying to fight it.
Like they've got some say in this.
Is that what I...
Maybe this is-- Maybe that's not what this means.
I thought it was Tracy had sent me the motion, and I read it, but I can't find where I've read it.
So but it, now that you say that, I remember that one of the requests is that they impound whatever exhibits they put in relating to the children to bar the media from being able to put it out into the public sphere.
I, I absolutely think that should and will happen, for sure.
Is that all the father's asking, or he's asking to limit it in the courtroom somehow?
I'm not sure he has standing for, in the trial, but-
... as we all know, this is one of those cases that they don't need, unless there's something about the manner, you know, the manner in which the, ah, material was applied to the children, we'll just say that, that the, that the state believes proves that she was in her right mind at the time.
Like I, I, I don't see how it could.
But as we all know, in this case, the defendant, Lindsay Clancy, is not denying that she committed the acts.
This is all about whether she is legally, criminally responsible-
...
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.