Kevin Reddington

But what happened next has sparked absolute outrage.

Defense attorney Kevin Reddington went on the attack targeting the single holdout juror who refused to convict.

He demanded the court investigate this person, accusing them of misconduct, lying during jury selection and refusing to follow the law.

That's up in the air, and it may be true.

But what happened next has sparked absolute outrage.

Defense attorney Kevin Reddington went on the attack targeting the single holdout juror who refused to convict.

He demanded the court investigate this person, accusing them of misconduct, lying during jury selection and refusing to follow the law.

That's up in the air and it may be true.

This is not by the state.

What is she thinking? As her attorney, Kevin Reddington, now claims, there is no proof she killed her three children.

Children, she stated the male voice told her to kill her children on that day within 24 hours of killing the children.

Amazingly, Reddington with a straight face is saying, yeah, that never happened.

Now, as most of you know, after the trial ended, several jurors came forward claiming 11 out of the 12 jurors were prepared to find Clancy not guilty by reason of insanity.

That's where we still stand today as they consider what to do next.

Now, Clancy's attorney, Kevin Reddington, denies that Lindsay Clancy will testify in Patrick Clancy's civil suit.

That's big news because it was indicated earlier that she would testify.

So manifest necessity is what a judge must find to ultimately declare a mistrial.

And interestingly enough, in a lot of these filings, and particularly in Lindsey Clancy's filing, Kevin Reddington that filed this obviously is saying, which is really interesting to me is, The burden of finding manifest necessity really lies so much heavier with the state, with the Commonwealth, because obviously it's in some situations, it's obviously their interest to be able to try the case again.

So it's sort of like the there's a little more pressure on the Commonwealth and having to, in a sense, establish this.

And like you just said, and you laid it out perfectly there.

Your thoughts.

I think the horse is out of the barn on everything that's going to be said.

I mean, I don't know what else Kevin Reddington can talk about.

I mean, he's made the circuits.

Her lawyers are now asking the judge to dismiss the prosecution under double jeopardy principles.

Attorney Martin Weinberg has joined Kevin Reddington's team immediately.

specifically to handle the constitutional litigation.

The defense argues that the judge should not have declared a mistrial without more closely examining concerns about the holdout juror, particularly after the jury foreperson raised the question about whether the juror was properly applying the court's instructions.

And a good example of that, I'll admit, was during the Lindsay Clancy trial.

I was the one from the courtroom that first put out when attorney Kevin Reddington had basically given the, Kevin Reddington identified the gender of the holdout juror.

Because I was there, and three times in a row he used the word he.

Now, Sister Sue and some of the others, they stayed away from that.