Bechorot 31 בכורות ל״א

Now the brightest of here, all these people, right? If you look at Rashi's over here, this is the end of a brighter we saw previously.

Okay, and Rabbeinu Gershom just brings it on, if it's part of the, he says, Okay, so the Rabbeinu Gershom gives a whole list of things over here.

So we have Rabbeinu Gershom in the inside column.

He says, All these are changed, they went back on the original acceptance of chaveirut.

So a woman who's the husband of a chaveirut married a chaveirut.

Now they routinely are chuv chaveirut, etc.

All these people he's speaking about, the sons, the children, the wife, the daughter, etc.

And now they want to, now they've left the world, so to speak, of chaveirut.

And now they want to come back to be chaveirim again.

You can never save them back again.

You were a chaveir, or you were married to a chaveir, or you were the daughter of a chaveir, you stopped, you're not married to a chaveir, we don't take you back ever again.

Rabbi Yudah Omei, what are you talking about? Chazu b'matmoniyot ein mekabri notan.

Befahesia mekabri notan.

There's a couple of ways to understand.

We'll see in a moment what exactly this means.

It says over here, Rabbi Yudah says no. Chazu b'matmoniyot So if it was secretly, then we don't have to accept them.

So what does it mean over here? He says, So the way that the Quran understands it, the pshat is as follows.

Rabbi Yudah says that if they were in secret, right? But basically, I'm going to answer to you now.

I'm hesitating how it sounds because we're just going to the second version.

Maybe it'll make the first version better.

So the first version says, when they came back, they only started keeping things privately.

Then we don't accept them.

But they started doing things in public, then we do accept them.

And the Iked Amri says, another version says, And look at Rashi.

In other words, while they were from being the first version says that they want they stop being now they want to become but they're only doing that privately we don't accept if they're doing if they're behaving like in public we do accept it the other version says that if they were stopping to be privately we accept them but if they stop being we don't accept them That's probably the best way to explain it, right? Irrespective of what the case was.