Daf Yomi with Rabbi Phil Karesh
Sep 23, 2026 · 43 min · 9 segments
Join Daf Yomi with Rabbi Phil Karesh for a clear, on-the-Daf shiur.
Phil KareshHost
When we learned last on Erev Yom Kippur, we were different Jews then, but we learned on the bottom of Beis Amid Beis that there was this concept of a knas, a concept that if I incorrectly, in the case as presented on the bottom of Beis Amid Beis, if I was nosen lobe kabbalah, that there was a knas.
If I gave out a contract to... a goy and it had an impact on an ubar that could have been a vachor, the halacha is I have to chase him down and pay 10x.
Says the Gemara, Resh Lakish agrees with this in a variation case, which is, maybe actually a more classical case, The regular isser, as you'll recall on Daf Beis, we learned from the Gemara in Avodah Zarah, was quoted there, that I'm not allowed to sell a behema to a goy, lest it get worked on Shabbos.
And over here we see in this Amorek statement granted, but we see here it's also 10x for Rish Lakish who says 10 in the case of Mechira, 10x in the case of Mechira.
He would also say, he's going to draw that from the Bressa that we saw on the bottom of Bez, Amud.
Was this like a hyperbolic language of 10? We said on the bottom, in the case of Kablonos, you have to chase him down and pay up to 10x.
Resh Lakish says, in the case of Mechira, you have to slap on the wrist, you have to pay 10x.
It says the Gemara, it wants to know, Gimel Amad Aleph, six lines down, Dafka Olav Dafka.
Is 10x exacting or is 10x not exacting? Was it just, again, hyperbolic language? So the Gemara says, Tashma, let's see a case where the language gets a little different.
And we'll see some of the halachos there and that we've actually learned in previous mesechdas.
When we learned last on Erev Yom Kippur, we were different Jews then, but we learned on the bottom of Beis Amid Beis that there was this concept of a knas, a concept that if I incorrectly, in the case as presented on the bottom of Beis Amid Beis, if I was nosen lobe kabbalah, that there was a knas.
If I gave out a contract to... a goy and it had an impact on an ubar that could have been a vachor, the halacha is I have to chase him down and pay 10x.
Says the Gemara, Resh Lakish agrees with this in a variation case, which is, maybe actually a more classical case, The regular isser, as you'll recall on Daf Beis, we learned from the Gemara in Avodah Zarah, was quoted there, that I'm not allowed to sell a behema to a goy, lest it get worked on Shabbos.
And over here we see in this Amorek statement granted, but we see here it's also 10x for Rish Lakish who says 10 in the case of Mechira, 10x in the case of Mechira.
He would also say, he's going to draw that from the Bressa that we saw on the bottom of Bez, Amud.
Was this like a hyperbolic language of 10? We said on the bottom, in the case of Kablonos, you have to chase him down and pay up to 10x.
Resh Lakish says, in the case of Mechira, you have to slap on the wrist, you have to pay 10x.
It says the Gemara, it wants to know, Gimel Amad Aleph, six lines down, Dafka Olav Dafka.
Is 10x exacting or is 10x not exacting? Was it just, again, hyperbolic language? So the Gemara says, Tashma, let's see a case where the language gets a little different.
And we'll see some of the halachos there and that we've actually learned in previous mesechdas.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.
