Oct 21, 2026 · 24 min · 23 segments
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The simulation hypothesis suggests that everything we experience, our whole universe and everyone in it, could actually be an advanced digital simulation created by a higher order, technologically advanced civilization.
Supporters of this idea frequently mention progress in technology and virtual worlds to imply that cultures much more advanced than ours might generate simulations so detailed that even the complexity of a character's simulated brain would be enough to make it sentient.
And if this is possible, then how would we know whether our world is not such a simulation? How realistic is such a notion? We can get an idea by estimating the amount of computing power that such a complex simulation would require.
Hans Moravec of Carnegie Mellon University, an expert in robotics and AI, has made a rough estimate of the amount of computing power needed to simulate a human mind.
Other experts calculate this number to be even larger, up to 10 to the 21 operations per second.
This level of computing power could make the simulated beings conscious because they would essentially have exactly the same brain capability of any real humans.
Do we have the capability to perform these kinds of computations? No, not currently.
But many people, including Ray Kurzweil, director at Google, have argued that such technology is less than 20 years away.
K. Eric Drexler, a PhD engineer from MIT, outlined a design for a system the size of a sugar cube that could perform 10 to the 21 operations per second.
And Robert Bradbury has conceptualized a hypothetical computing megastructure called a Matryoshka brain based on a planet-sized Dyson sphere that would have computing power on the order of 10 to the 42 operations per second.
But to make a universe simulation, not only would the brain need to be simulated, but also our environment and the passage of time.
How much computing power would this require? Well, simulating the entire universe down to the quantum level would require a computer theoretically bigger than the size of the universe.
The simulation hypothesis suggests that everything we experience, our whole universe and everyone in it, could actually be an advanced digital simulation created by a higher order, technologically advanced civilization.
Supporters of this idea frequently mention progress in technology and virtual worlds to imply that cultures much more advanced than ours might generate simulations so detailed that even the complexity of a character's simulated brain would be enough to make it sentient.
And if this is possible, then how would we know whether our world is not such a simulation? How realistic is such a notion? We can get an idea by estimating the amount of computing power that such a complex simulation would require.
Hans Moravec of Carnegie Mellon University, an expert in robotics and AI, has made a rough estimate of the amount of computing power needed to simulate a human mind.
Other experts calculate this number to be even larger, up to 10 to the 21 operations per second.
This level of computing power could make the simulated beings conscious because they would essentially have exactly the same brain capability of any real humans.
Do we have the capability to perform these kinds of computations? No, not currently.
But many people, including Ray Kurzweil, director at Google, have argued that such technology is less than 20 years away.
K. Eric Drexler, a PhD engineer from MIT, outlined a design for a system the size of a sugar cube that could perform 10 to the 21 operations per second.
And Robert Bradbury has conceptualized a hypothetical computing megastructure called a Matryoshka brain based on a planet-sized Dyson sphere that would have computing power on the order of 10 to the 42 operations per second.
But to make a universe simulation, not only would the brain need to be simulated, but also our environment and the passage of time.
How much computing power would this require? Well, simulating the entire universe down to the quantum level would require a computer theoretically bigger than the size of the universe.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.