Aug 4, 2026 · 42 min · 10 segments
In this episode, Ayesha and Andrew discuss the **August 5, 2026** issue of JBJS, along with an added dose of entertainment and pop culture. Listen at the gym, on your commute, or whenever your case is…
Andrew SchoenfeldHost
Aisha AbdeenHostMy headline is comparison of large language models with rules-based natural language processing algorithms for extracting data from orthopedic notes.
Everyone should be able to access this regardless, at least for the next 30 days.
So this study is looking to compare two different approaches to extracting data from medical records.
And that is the large language model with a rule-based natural language processing algorithm.
The large language models may be a little bit more AI-reliant, although I'm sure you can do natural language processing algorithms using AI programming at this point.
When my team and I have done them in the past, they've been a little bit more individual programmer-heavy algorithms.
It's somewhat of an interesting concept, and I think it's different when you're looking at these things for extracting data for research purposes versus extracting data for maybe reporting to a registry or something to that effect.
It's not entirely clear to me exactly which route these authors are going in terms of their intent.
Honestly, what's good for one may be good for the other, the exception being that this does in some ways essentially cut corners.
From a research standpoint, my opinion, take it for what it's worth, is if you're abstracting data, nothing beats a good old-fashioned chart biopsy.
If you're outsourcing it to something else that's just going to pull stuff for you based on a large language model and populate something... it's likely that there are going to be errors.
The notes came from three hospitals located, they say, at three geographically distinct sites in the United States, but it's still all within the same health system.
It's not a community hospital where you'll have a couple of different private practices or something like that.
My headline is comparison of large language models with rules-based natural language processing algorithms for extracting data from orthopedic notes.
Everyone should be able to access this regardless, at least for the next 30 days.
So this study is looking to compare two different approaches to extracting data from medical records.
And that is the large language model with a rule-based natural language processing algorithm.
The large language models may be a little bit more AI-reliant, although I'm sure you can do natural language processing algorithms using AI programming at this point.
When my team and I have done them in the past, they've been a little bit more individual programmer-heavy algorithms.
It's somewhat of an interesting concept, and I think it's different when you're looking at these things for extracting data for research purposes versus extracting data for maybe reporting to a registry or something to that effect.
It's not entirely clear to me exactly which route these authors are going in terms of their intent.
Honestly, what's good for one may be good for the other, the exception being that this does in some ways essentially cut corners.
From a research standpoint, my opinion, take it for what it's worth, is if you're abstracting data, nothing beats a good old-fashioned chart biopsy.
If you're outsourcing it to something else that's just going to pull stuff for you based on a large language model and populate something... it's likely that there are going to be errors.
The notes came from three hospitals located, they say, at three geographically distinct sites in the United States, but it's still all within the same health system.
It's not a community hospital where you'll have a couple of different private practices or something like that.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.