Aug 16, 2026 · 1 hr 18 min · 12 segments
!https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/514eec13e4b0123f55d340ba/1604435548499-QTTZUEIH49Z8GP7KW7YT/YCBN+Logo.png?format=1000w YCBN 160 - The Gaza Tribunal Report - Part 2…
The Gaza Tribunal Report, Part 2 quote states including the united kingdom have been on notice for decades for their obligations and they have not acted accordingly they have an obligation to respect and ensure respect of international humanitarian law and they have miserably failed this mission francesca albanese part two what are britain's legal responsibilities As a permanent member of the UN Security Council, a high-contracting party to the 1949 Geneva Conventions, a party to the Genocide Convention and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, in a state with long-standing diplomatic, military and economic ties to Israel, The United Kingdom has heightened responsibilities in relation to Israel's conduct in Gaza and the wider occupied Palestinian territory, OPT.
Those responsibilities are not only political, they are legal duties arising under treaty law, customary international law, and peremptory norms, just cogens.
This section sets out 1.
The UK's obligations as a matter of state responsibility, including duties owed to the international community as a whole.
2.
The implications of the International Court of Justice's 2024 Advisory Opinion on legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of Israel in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem.
And 3.
The most immediate areas where UK policy risks unlawful assistance, complicity or individual criminality.
1.
The legal framework, state responsibility and ergo omnis obligations.
1.1.
The sources of the UK's obligations.
International responsibility arises where conduct attributable to a state, by act or omission, breaches an international obligation.
Attribution extends to all organs of the government, including ministers, the armed forces, and intelligence agencies.
Beyond bilateral duties, certain obligations are owed ergo omnes meaning to the international community as a whole, including according to the basic rules protecting people's right to self-determination and the fundamental prohibitions underpinning international humanitarian law and genocide prevention.
Where such obligations are at stake, third states do not have discretion to treat compliance as optional or purely political.
Five bodies of law are central to the UK's responsibilities in this context.
1.
The Geneva Conventions of 1949 As a high-contracting party, the UK is bound by Common Article 1 to quote, "...respect and ensure respect for international humanitarian law, IHL, which prohibits targeting civilians, collective punishment, unlawful displacement, and denial of humanitarian relief." 2.
This duty is proactive and extends beyond its territory, requiring action wherever the risk of genocide exists.
This duty was effectuated by the provisional measures of the ICJ in South Africa v. Israel, January 2024.
3.
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court As a state party, the UK must cooperate fully with the ICC, including executing arrest warrants for individuals suspected of crimes in Gaza, and must refrain from conduct that frustrates the court's mandate.
4.
The Gaza Tribunal Report, Part 2 quote states including the united kingdom have been on notice for decades for their obligations and they have not acted accordingly they have an obligation to respect and ensure respect of international humanitarian law and they have miserably failed this mission francesca albanese part two what are britain's legal responsibilities As a permanent member of the UN Security Council, a high-contracting party to the 1949 Geneva Conventions, a party to the Genocide Convention and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, in a state with long-standing diplomatic, military and economic ties to Israel, The United Kingdom has heightened responsibilities in relation to Israel's conduct in Gaza and the wider occupied Palestinian territory, OPT.
Those responsibilities are not only political, they are legal duties arising under treaty law, customary international law, and peremptory norms, just cogens.
This section sets out 1.
The UK's obligations as a matter of state responsibility, including duties owed to the international community as a whole.
2.
The implications of the International Court of Justice's 2024 Advisory Opinion on legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of Israel in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem.
And 3.
The most immediate areas where UK policy risks unlawful assistance, complicity or individual criminality.
1.
The legal framework, state responsibility and ergo omnis obligations.
1.1.
The sources of the UK's obligations.
International responsibility arises where conduct attributable to a state, by act or omission, breaches an international obligation.
Attribution extends to all organs of the government, including ministers, the armed forces, and intelligence agencies.
Beyond bilateral duties, certain obligations are owed ergo omnes meaning to the international community as a whole, including according to the basic rules protecting people's right to self-determination and the fundamental prohibitions underpinning international humanitarian law and genocide prevention.
Where such obligations are at stake, third states do not have discretion to treat compliance as optional or purely political.
Five bodies of law are central to the UK's responsibilities in this context.
1.
The Geneva Conventions of 1949 As a high-contracting party, the UK is bound by Common Article 1 to quote, "...respect and ensure respect for international humanitarian law, IHL, which prohibits targeting civilians, collective punishment, unlawful displacement, and denial of humanitarian relief." 2.
This duty is proactive and extends beyond its territory, requiring action wherever the risk of genocide exists.
This duty was effectuated by the provisional measures of the ICJ in South Africa v. Israel, January 2024.
3.
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court As a state party, the UK must cooperate fully with the ICC, including executing arrest warrants for individuals suspected of crimes in Gaza, and must refrain from conduct that frustrates the court's mandate.
4.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.