The Report Card with Nat Malkus
Jul 29, 2026 · 1 hr 15 min · 16 segments
On this episode of The Report Card, Nat Malkus speaks with…
Nat MalkusHost
you're talking about this perspective back in 2007, where it was just very normal to think in monopoly terms and that that was appropriate.

You still hear lots of people saying, oh, well, it's a monopolistic system and it's dominated by that.

What's the appropriate perspective on how much that sort of monolithic entity factor has changed or or has not changed?
I would say it is incremental change quantitatively, but significant change philosophically, meaning there is an openness In particular, I think post-pandemic, and you've written about some similar issues, there is an openness post-pandemic to the idea that the monopoly operator, the school boards, do face a set of legitimate competitive threats, not just kind of notional things you can take to your legislature and cry for more money, but existential threats.
Today's landscape is much more conscious of markets and competition than was the case 20 years ago.
And at the same time, when you're state superintendent in Louisiana, you don't just sit up there and be like, hey, Tensaw Parish, Louisiana, you got 800 kids.
I mean, there are some times, many times, maybe even most times when the most viable path to change runs right through the local public school.
The philosophical understanding and our relationship to markets and competition has changed.
That doesn't mean that we should ignore the fact that quantitatively and practically, pragmatically, oftentimes the route to change goes through the traditional public school.

you're talking about this perspective back in 2007, where it was just very normal to think in monopoly terms and that that was appropriate.

You still hear lots of people saying, oh, well, it's a monopolistic system and it's dominated by that.

What's the appropriate perspective on how much that sort of monolithic entity factor has changed or or has not changed?
I would say it is incremental change quantitatively, but significant change philosophically, meaning there is an openness In particular, I think post-pandemic, and you've written about some similar issues, there is an openness post-pandemic to the idea that the monopoly operator, the school boards, do face a set of legitimate competitive threats, not just kind of notional things you can take to your legislature and cry for more money, but existential threats.
Today's landscape is much more conscious of markets and competition than was the case 20 years ago.
And at the same time, when you're state superintendent in Louisiana, you don't just sit up there and be like, hey, Tensaw Parish, Louisiana, you got 800 kids.
I mean, there are some times, many times, maybe even most times when the most viable path to change runs right through the local public school.
The philosophical understanding and our relationship to markets and competition has changed.
That doesn't mean that we should ignore the fact that quantitatively and practically, pragmatically, oftentimes the route to change goes through the traditional public school.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.