And I use this because it's a sort of self-appellation, right, that the left had, at least in the 2010s, right? It started sort of on Chapo Trap House and that kind of part of the sort of, you could call it the Bernie bro left, but, you know, mostly male, but kind of younger left-wing spaces.
And You know, the dirtbag thing was a thing they sort of called themselves as a way of saying, you know, we don't take
seriously, right? We're cool with a certain degree of edginess and maybe even meanness.
Because to me, it's really kind of attitudinal disposition, right? it has to do that necessarily like being unkind, although, you know, I think it's good to be kind.
Um, it has more to do with this idea of sort of, uh, I guess, I guess a good way to put it might be fire with fire.
Um, that, that, well, if we're going to oppose sort of fascism and, and the, the, the, the real extremisms of the Trump era, uh, we should be willing to engage in all kinds of, I think, frankly, pretty aggressive, uh, modes of rhetoric and politics, you know, and also we shouldn't be encumbered, right, by constantly sort of self-editing when it comes to how we talk and how we express our ideas, right? So we're not going to worry that much about saying words that have become kind of taboo, you know, like the R slur.
We're not going to worry that much about if we're dabbling ourself in maybe language that I think, you know, pretty clearly tips over into not just being sort of mean, right, but being outright, I think, offensive or cruel.
And I think edginess undersells it because it's not just edginess, but it's also, I do think there's a malice as well, a sort of desire to be cruel and a desire to be, if not indifferent, then maybe even actively transgressive towards people they perceive as their enemies.
And the kind of thing that ties it all together is, well, this is fine because our cause is
As long as you have all these kind of correct left positions, you can engage in politics in all these different ways.
That you're talking in a certain way and you're speaking in these cruel ways.
But it seems like there's, on the far right, there's a real connection between the cruelty in rhetoric and the cruelty in policy.
You know, like a Stephen Miller is cruel in both and intentionally so, I believe.
And I use this because it's a sort of self-appellation, right, that the left had, at least in the 2010s, right? It started sort of on Chapo Trap House and that kind of part of the sort of, you could call it the Bernie bro left, but, you know, mostly male, but kind of younger left-wing spaces.
And You know, the dirtbag thing was a thing they sort of called themselves as a way of saying, you know, we don't take
seriously, right? We're cool with a certain degree of edginess and maybe even meanness.
Because to me, it's really kind of attitudinal disposition, right? it has to do that necessarily like being unkind, although, you know, I think it's good to be kind.
Um, it has more to do with this idea of sort of, uh, I guess, I guess a good way to put it might be fire with fire.
Um, that, that, well, if we're going to oppose sort of fascism and, and the, the, the, the real extremisms of the Trump era, uh, we should be willing to engage in all kinds of, I think, frankly, pretty aggressive, uh, modes of rhetoric and politics, you know, and also we shouldn't be encumbered, right, by constantly sort of self-editing when it comes to how we talk and how we express our ideas, right? So we're not going to worry that much about saying words that have become kind of taboo, you know, like the R slur.
We're not going to worry that much about if we're dabbling ourself in maybe language that I think, you know, pretty clearly tips over into not just being sort of mean, right, but being outright, I think, offensive or cruel.
And I think edginess undersells it because it's not just edginess, but it's also, I do think there's a malice as well, a sort of desire to be cruel and a desire to be, if not indifferent, then maybe even actively transgressive towards people they perceive as their enemies.
And the kind of thing that ties it all together is, well, this is fine because our cause is
As long as you have all these kind of correct left positions, you can engage in politics in all these different ways.
That you're talking in a certain way and you're speaking in these cruel ways.
But it seems like there's, on the far right, there's a real connection between the cruelty in rhetoric and the cruelty in policy.
You know, like a Stephen Miller is cruel in both and intentionally so, I believe.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.