Sep 22, 2026 · 33 min · 12 segments
NATO expert Dr Florence Gaub explains how strategic foresight helps NATO anticipate and avoid strategic surprise in an uncertain world. Strategic surprise happens when new information fundamentally…
Florence GaubGuestPaul O'NeillHost
Beatrice HeuserHost
Hmm, where do we begin? First of all, I think saying the future is unpredictable is a lazy response to the reality of human life because that doesn't help us with getting ready for it.

Secondly, parts of the future are in fact predictable, or if not predictable, then at least you can think about them in a certain way.



It's to reduce the possibilities from seemingly infinite to, let's say, an actionable corridor of possibilities.

I think this trope of uncertainty re-emerges every time you have an increase in actors.

I graduated from the Middle East into Strategic Foresight because of the Arab Spring.

When the Arab Spring started, there was a huge debate about why didn't we see that coming.

And essentially the answer is because we didn't think that the people in the Middle East were an actor when it came to the future.

So when you have new actors coming in, that makes it a bit more unpredictable because you have many more actors that can influence the future.

And secondly, when you have more information, somewhat absurdly, because you would think that The more you know about the future, the more you can say actually with certainty what's going to happen.

The more you know, the more effort you have to make to sort between the signal and the noise.

And so a lot of people say it's just uncertain and there's nothing we can do about it.

And of course, with the change in geopolitics, with actors from Brazil to the Emirates and China, now actors playing a role that didn't play a role 50 years ago, That creates a bit more chaos in the system.

Hmm, where do we begin? First of all, I think saying the future is unpredictable is a lazy response to the reality of human life because that doesn't help us with getting ready for it.

Secondly, parts of the future are in fact predictable, or if not predictable, then at least you can think about them in a certain way.



It's to reduce the possibilities from seemingly infinite to, let's say, an actionable corridor of possibilities.

I think this trope of uncertainty re-emerges every time you have an increase in actors.

I graduated from the Middle East into Strategic Foresight because of the Arab Spring.

When the Arab Spring started, there was a huge debate about why didn't we see that coming.

And essentially the answer is because we didn't think that the people in the Middle East were an actor when it came to the future.

So when you have new actors coming in, that makes it a bit more unpredictable because you have many more actors that can influence the future.

And secondly, when you have more information, somewhat absurdly, because you would think that The more you know about the future, the more you can say actually with certainty what's going to happen.

The more you know, the more effort you have to make to sort between the signal and the noise.

And so a lot of people say it's just uncertain and there's nothing we can do about it.

And of course, with the change in geopolitics, with actors from Brazil to the Emirates and China, now actors playing a role that didn't play a role 50 years ago, That creates a bit more chaos in the system.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.