Aug 16, 2026 · 18 min · 16 segments
Mark and Gary break down Luigi Mangione’s surprise guilty plea in federal court and the legal strategy behind the immediate double jeopardy challenge in New York state court. They examine why there…
Mark GeragosHostGary SmithHost
I think my obvious reflexive topic is Luigi, because we're on, what are we, we're dropped this, we're a day and a half, two days almost, from the change of plea, which if you're following the case, Luigi Mangione was being prosecuted both federally and state.
And on the eve of the state trial, which was set to begin in a couple of weeks, they went over to federal court, worked out a deal where they pled to the indictment.
They really didn't work out a deal, which You're you're so sharp because the there's been a lot of speculation that this was the DOJ's way to stick it to Alvin Bragg, who prosecuted President Trump.
If they had entered into a plea agreement, you might have a pretty good argument on that, that how did the DOJ do this? And the reason is, obviously, that people are surmising that's what happened is because they're simultaneous with the entering of the plea.
And Luigi giving a very expansive factual basis for the plea, as you have to do when you're in federal court when you plead.
That expansive basis, because he's not charged with murder in federal court, but he did admit to the murder in federal court.
The argument is, that they knew that they needed to do that in order to then simultaneously or contemporaneously file the double jeopardy motion in state court, which they did.
I mean, maybe I have my timeline off by 20 minutes or so here, but it seems like while he was giving his admission and entering into his plea, they filed the paperwork on the state case trying to raise it up to double jeopardy question there.
The responses by the prosecutor, the lead prosecutor, and they unsealed the letter.
that there have been talks about a plea agreement and they wanted to alert, I don't know who they, when you file it under seal, I don't know who you're trying, based on published reports, I don't know who you're trying to alert.
And now the question is, And for those who, if you want to get really into the weeds, this was brought almost simultaneously, the federal prosecution and the state prosecution.
I think my obvious reflexive topic is Luigi, because we're on, what are we, we're dropped this, we're a day and a half, two days almost, from the change of plea, which if you're following the case, Luigi Mangione was being prosecuted both federally and state.
And on the eve of the state trial, which was set to begin in a couple of weeks, they went over to federal court, worked out a deal where they pled to the indictment.
They really didn't work out a deal, which You're you're so sharp because the there's been a lot of speculation that this was the DOJ's way to stick it to Alvin Bragg, who prosecuted President Trump.
If they had entered into a plea agreement, you might have a pretty good argument on that, that how did the DOJ do this? And the reason is, obviously, that people are surmising that's what happened is because they're simultaneous with the entering of the plea.
And Luigi giving a very expansive factual basis for the plea, as you have to do when you're in federal court when you plead.
That expansive basis, because he's not charged with murder in federal court, but he did admit to the murder in federal court.
The argument is, that they knew that they needed to do that in order to then simultaneously or contemporaneously file the double jeopardy motion in state court, which they did.
I mean, maybe I have my timeline off by 20 minutes or so here, but it seems like while he was giving his admission and entering into his plea, they filed the paperwork on the state case trying to raise it up to double jeopardy question there.
The responses by the prosecutor, the lead prosecutor, and they unsealed the letter.
that there have been talks about a plea agreement and they wanted to alert, I don't know who they, when you file it under seal, I don't know who you're trying, based on published reports, I don't know who you're trying to alert.
And now the question is, And for those who, if you want to get really into the weeds, this was brought almost simultaneously, the federal prosecution and the state prosecution.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.