NOTR - KING CHARLES & THE BETRAYAL OF ENGLAND - 7.11.26

All right, so that is, I thought, a pretty powerful explanation from Dr. Hammond.

Now, when he's talking about the judgment of violating an oath, swearing an oath before God, we're talking about the God of the Bible.

You go to Jeremiah 34, around verse 18, where God talks about those who transgress a covenant where he says, and I will give the men that have transgressed my covenant, which have not performed the words of the covenant, which they had made before me when they cut the calf in twain and passed between the parts thereof.

And so the symbolism of that, of the cutting the calf in half and passing between the parts in the Old Testament, that was a symbol when two people swore an oath or a covenant or something together, that you had to perform the complete oath.

And if you did not perform it, then you would be cut asunder like the calf that the two people are walking in between.

So the calf was a symbol that you've got to perform the oath from the beginning to the end.

And if you don't, then you're cut asunder.

You're judged by God.

That's why for a king to swear an oath to fulfill certain responsibilities, if he violated that oath, he was held accountable.

And that's what our ancestors believed.

That's why our forefathers fought the American Revolution, because King George III, they believed, violated his oath.

So England has been a Christian country for more than a thousand years.

And probably some would argue for 2000 years until probably somewhere around the 80s and 90s.

Certainly by the time Tony Blair got in there, he dramatically increased the amount of Muslims in the country.

And of course, we believe Tony Blair was a Vatican agent working for the Pope and the Jesuit order.

But that's our take on it.

I would encourage anybody to investigate Blair.

There's no doubt Tony Blair was involved in what the English call stealth Catholicism.

But now is what is King Charles III up to? Well, he was sworn in.

I remember I did a radio show on it when he was sworn in.

He was sworn in as the defender of the faith.

Now, Buckingham Palace has released official declarations to the effect that King Charles is the defender of faiths in the plural sense.

So you have all these articles and videos that are being published now that are basically declaring that King Charles is is a traitor.

I mean, here's a Christian today.com says former, former Queens chaplain, King Charles has betrayed his faith office and subjects.

This is here right at the end of June.