Moving Forests with Keshav Sharma
Jun 26, 2026 · 1 hr 9 min · 11 segments
Do bats really suck blood? Do they get tangled in people's hair? Are they responsible for spreading diseases?For most people, bats are surrounded by fear and myths. But what if these misunderstood…
Rajesh PuttaswamaiahGuest
Keshav SharmaHost
Some of them, they just, what do you call, smoke it along the fire and smoke.

They store it for a couple of days depending on how much harvest they get.

First is, humans have always been dependent on wildlife i mean we've been civilized for how many years maybe max three four hundred years five hundred years and before that we were all dependent on going and killing and eating from the wild or maybe you know plucking and whatever like we were entirely dependent on on nature if a species is least concerned and this is just i'm not advocating for it There are many species like this that people harvest and eat, like fish, for example, right? Fish is also wildlife.

And some others, I'm not going to name them because some people are not like, they may not even know that it is least concern.

So what's your view on that? If it is least concern and if they are having it, how is it? Do you think that only...

the numbers getting affected in this area will affect the species at large? Or what change in ecosystem will happen if it happens there? What is the impact that it can have on that population?

In fact, before going to Nagaland, even my perception about conservation was like what many other urban guys think about, right? Like everything should stop and they should not be hunting, hunting should be completely banned.


But what I could sense there was, for example, even kids, the three-year-old kid, the favorite pastime for them is, after coming back from school, is to just hunt birds all around.

The hunting has been rampant there, but I felt like for that kind of landscape, the population density should have been much higher than what I witnessed.

So hunting has been there for a long time, but somehow the wildlife is also surviving, but not to the extent that it should have been.

Some of them, they just, what do you call, smoke it along the fire and smoke.

They store it for a couple of days depending on how much harvest they get.

First is, humans have always been dependent on wildlife i mean we've been civilized for how many years maybe max three four hundred years five hundred years and before that we were all dependent on going and killing and eating from the wild or maybe you know plucking and whatever like we were entirely dependent on on nature if a species is least concerned and this is just i'm not advocating for it There are many species like this that people harvest and eat, like fish, for example, right? Fish is also wildlife.

And some others, I'm not going to name them because some people are not like, they may not even know that it is least concern.

So what's your view on that? If it is least concern and if they are having it, how is it? Do you think that only...

the numbers getting affected in this area will affect the species at large? Or what change in ecosystem will happen if it happens there? What is the impact that it can have on that population?

In fact, before going to Nagaland, even my perception about conservation was like what many other urban guys think about, right? Like everything should stop and they should not be hunting, hunting should be completely banned.


But what I could sense there was, for example, even kids, the three-year-old kid, the favorite pastime for them is, after coming back from school, is to just hunt birds all around.

The hunting has been rampant there, but I felt like for that kind of landscape, the population density should have been much higher than what I witnessed.

So hunting has been there for a long time, but somehow the wildlife is also surviving, but not to the extent that it should have been.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.