Oct 10, 2026 · 43 min · 12 segments
On “Katie Pavlich Tonight*,*” Eric Deters shares his perspective on his messages with now-Ambassador Kimberly Guilfoyle regarding a $100K Amex bill. NewsNation hosts the U.S. Senate debate in…
Dorian BaumGuest
Eric DetersGuest
John ZieglerPanelist
Michael Starr HopkinsPanelistNewsNation Co-HostHostMarisa BlackJoining us now to react to what we just heard from him, News Nation political contributor and aggressive progressive podcast host Chris Hahn and Seattle radio host Jason Rantz.
Jason, your reaction to that interview and this story that we have about Kimberly Guilfoyle.
Is this a legitimate problem or is this an October surprise three weeks before the election?
I will say, when I read the Wall Street Journal and then some of the follow-up reporting, I think Daily Mail Today had something as well that I read, I thought this was an awful look.
I mean, he does not seem like a reliable narrator that I would go to, and him calling into question the Wall Street Journal reporting, which initially seemed pretty damaging and damning, him saying it's not necessarily accurate, now it just seems rather confusing.
But I think after that interview, I don't view this as that much of a scandal anymore, and it almost seems like he's going out of his way to delegitimize the actual reporting that did make her look bad.
Look, I, too, worked with Kimberly Guilfoyle for many years, and we were adversarial on TV, but not offscreen.
Well, he wanted to be a public figure, so now those rules apply to him in defamation.
Joining us now to react to what we just heard from him, News Nation political contributor and aggressive progressive podcast host Chris Hahn and Seattle radio host Jason Rantz.
Jason, your reaction to that interview and this story that we have about Kimberly Guilfoyle.
Is this a legitimate problem or is this an October surprise three weeks before the election?
I will say, when I read the Wall Street Journal and then some of the follow-up reporting, I think Daily Mail Today had something as well that I read, I thought this was an awful look.
I mean, he does not seem like a reliable narrator that I would go to, and him calling into question the Wall Street Journal reporting, which initially seemed pretty damaging and damning, him saying it's not necessarily accurate, now it just seems rather confusing.
But I think after that interview, I don't view this as that much of a scandal anymore, and it almost seems like he's going out of his way to delegitimize the actual reporting that did make her look bad.
Look, I, too, worked with Kimberly Guilfoyle for many years, and we were adversarial on TV, but not offscreen.
Well, he wanted to be a public figure, so now those rules apply to him in defamation.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.