May 28, 2026 · 17 min · 10 segments
What if your obsession with “feeling the emotion”… is actually hurting your acting? Today we’re talking about the difference between feeling something… and doing something. And trust me— this one…
Jeffrey DreisbachHostLet's just talk about feelings in general because, uh, this is what I think, and based on the experience I've had over the years, both as an actor and now in casting, feelings are unreliable.
They are, 'cause here's the issue: human beings do not consistently control emotions, right? If we did, none of us would, oh, I don't know, eat cake at midnight while watching documentaries about failed amusement parks.
You may not instantly feel heartbreak, but you can plead, attack, avoid, seduce, pressure, joke, withdraw, guilt, comfort.
The problem with emotion first acting, and that's what I call it, I'm calling it emotional first acting or emotion first acting, it becomes self-focused.
"Am I emotional enough? Do I feel it? Did that look real?" The performance turns inward, but great acting usually moves outward toward another person.
And here's another thing casting notices immediately:Actors trying to feel often stop listening.
They're checking, "Am I emotional enough? Am I connected enough? Is this moment working?" That's all going on while you're acting.
Meanwhile, the scene partner just changed the entire emotional dynamic, and the actor missed it completely because they were busy watching themselves perform.
They're engaged, they're affected, they're responsive, and honestly, some of the best auditions I've ever seen were not highly emotional.
What's the difference? Needs creates urgency, need creates behavior, need creates unpredictability, and unpredictability feels human.
That's why some actors can whisper and still break your heart, because truth does not equal volume.
Let's just talk about feelings in general because, uh, this is what I think, and based on the experience I've had over the years, both as an actor and now in casting, feelings are unreliable.
They are, 'cause here's the issue: human beings do not consistently control emotions, right? If we did, none of us would, oh, I don't know, eat cake at midnight while watching documentaries about failed amusement parks.
You may not instantly feel heartbreak, but you can plead, attack, avoid, seduce, pressure, joke, withdraw, guilt, comfort.
The problem with emotion first acting, and that's what I call it, I'm calling it emotional first acting or emotion first acting, it becomes self-focused.
"Am I emotional enough? Do I feel it? Did that look real?" The performance turns inward, but great acting usually moves outward toward another person.
And here's another thing casting notices immediately:Actors trying to feel often stop listening.
They're checking, "Am I emotional enough? Am I connected enough? Is this moment working?" That's all going on while you're acting.
Meanwhile, the scene partner just changed the entire emotional dynamic, and the actor missed it completely because they were busy watching themselves perform.
They're engaged, they're affected, they're responsive, and honestly, some of the best auditions I've ever seen were not highly emotional.
What's the difference? Needs creates urgency, need creates behavior, need creates unpredictability, and unpredictability feels human.
That's why some actors can whisper and still break your heart, because truth does not equal volume.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.
