Aviation News Talk – Pilot Stories, Safety Tips & General Aviation News
Aug 20, 2026 · 1 hr 1 min · 17 segments
In Episode 425 of Aviation News Talk, Max talks with retired Air Force General David Brubaker about STEM Flights, a nonprofit organization that pairs middle- and high-school students with volunteer…
David BrubakerGuestFrom harvard.eu, pilots, flight attendants have a greater risk of radiation cancer death.
Of the more than five hundred occupations in the US, flight attendants and pilots have the highest and second highest proportion of radiation-related cancer deaths, a new study has found.
The results support considering occupational radiation protections for US aircrew members commensurate with their level of exposure.
It's been known that aircrew members receive the largest annual effective dose of ionizing radiation of any workforce in the US, largely due to exposure to cosmic radiation at high altitudes.
Members of the profession are also more likely to be diagnosed with certain cancers than the general population, but studies have been limited as to whether this translates to higher rates of cancer mortality.
The new research, published August seventeenth in JAMA Internal Medicine, studied this question using a larger dataset and more statistical power than previously available.
The study looked at all US death certificates from twenty twenty to twenty twenty-four.
The records yielded data from nearly thirteen million decedents across five hundred and three occupations, including fourteen thousand pilots and seven thousand flight attendants.
The team found that pilots and flight attendants had statistically significantly higher rates of death from breast, central nervous system, and prostate cancers and melanoma.
In all, about six point nine percent of deaths among flight attendants and six point seven percent of deaths among pilots were from radiation-related cancers.
These proportions were higher than for any other profession, including nuclear technologists who weren't routinely exposed to radiation from non-cosmic sources, yet they placed twelfth on the list.
Aircraft mechanics and assemblers did not have higher rates than other occupations.
The FAA formally recognizes pilots and flight attendants as occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation.
But unlike other radiation-exposed workers or aircrews in other countries, US aircrews are not subject to federal dose limits or monitoring requirements.
Louisiana has joined a growing effort to limit how ADSB data can be used by airports.
A new state law now prohibits certain landing fees derived from aircraft tracking data.
Effective August first, Louisiana Act eight twenty-eight, originating as HB seven thirty, prohibits ADSB-derived landing fees for Part ninety-one aircraft weighing twelve thousand five hundred pounds or less.
The proposed Piloted Aircraft Privacy Act would restrict the use of ADSB data to identify aircraft for revenue collection, while the ALERT Act includes a similar prohibition.
As more states and lawmakers examine the issue, the question is becoming less about whether ADSB can generate data and more about how that data should serve aviation without discouraging the very flying it was designed to make safer.
From harvard.eu, pilots, flight attendants have a greater risk of radiation cancer death.
Of the more than five hundred occupations in the US, flight attendants and pilots have the highest and second highest proportion of radiation-related cancer deaths, a new study has found.
The results support considering occupational radiation protections for US aircrew members commensurate with their level of exposure.
It's been known that aircrew members receive the largest annual effective dose of ionizing radiation of any workforce in the US, largely due to exposure to cosmic radiation at high altitudes.
Members of the profession are also more likely to be diagnosed with certain cancers than the general population, but studies have been limited as to whether this translates to higher rates of cancer mortality.
The new research, published August seventeenth in JAMA Internal Medicine, studied this question using a larger dataset and more statistical power than previously available.
The study looked at all US death certificates from twenty twenty to twenty twenty-four.
The records yielded data from nearly thirteen million decedents across five hundred and three occupations, including fourteen thousand pilots and seven thousand flight attendants.
The team found that pilots and flight attendants had statistically significantly higher rates of death from breast, central nervous system, and prostate cancers and melanoma.
In all, about six point nine percent of deaths among flight attendants and six point seven percent of deaths among pilots were from radiation-related cancers.
These proportions were higher than for any other profession, including nuclear technologists who weren't routinely exposed to radiation from non-cosmic sources, yet they placed twelfth on the list.
Aircraft mechanics and assemblers did not have higher rates than other occupations.
The FAA formally recognizes pilots and flight attendants as occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation.
But unlike other radiation-exposed workers or aircrews in other countries, US aircrews are not subject to federal dose limits or monitoring requirements.
Louisiana has joined a growing effort to limit how ADSB data can be used by airports.
A new state law now prohibits certain landing fees derived from aircraft tracking data.
Effective August first, Louisiana Act eight twenty-eight, originating as HB seven thirty, prohibits ADSB-derived landing fees for Part ninety-one aircraft weighing twelve thousand five hundred pounds or less.
The proposed Piloted Aircraft Privacy Act would restrict the use of ADSB data to identify aircraft for revenue collection, while the ALERT Act includes a similar prohibition.
As more states and lawmakers examine the issue, the question is becoming less about whether ADSB can generate data and more about how that data should serve aviation without discouraging the very flying it was designed to make safer.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.