The Candace Debate Was Rigged From The Start

In the meantime, let's roll the clip of basically, uh, how this entire conversation felt as I watched it.

And, and then I'll give you my serious thoughts on it.

So let's roll the clip here.

Co- I love that.

I think it's really important to have these conversations, so Andrew, thank you for taking the time to be here, and Candace, thank you for agreeing to accept the $300,000 it took you to be here.

I love that.

So Andrew, let's start with you.

Uh, what's your question for Candace?

Okay, so my question is do you have any positive evidence that Israel or Erika Kirk, or anyone at Turning Point USA was involved in the murder of Charlie Kirk?

Uh, I don't, I don't understand the question.

I don't really know what you're asking, actually.

If all you were disputing was that the evidence for the case against Tyler Robertson was not sufficient, I would be the last person to be challenging you.

That's not why we're having this conversation.

Let me know when the time comes.

You have made claims asserting that you are 100% convinced that Erika Kirk is somehow complicit in Charlie Kirk's murder.

I actually never said that.

I, I have said what I feel, and I've said what I believe that I feel, that I know that I feel, and that's what I've said, and I'm not gonna change what I believe and what I feel and what I know.

But I've never actually said that.

You're, you're literally putting words in my mouth that I have not said.

So what did you say?

[laughs] I, I, I, I...

Look, I'm not gonna play this, like, game with you where you just, like, demand that I say things a certain way.

You didn't say that?

Okay, I don't know what this game is that you're playing, but like I've literally never said that Erika Kirk or Israel is complicit or involved.

I mean, I've said that I feel that they are certainly responsible in some way.