Jul 10, 2026 · 1 hr 6 min · 13 segments
In the first installment of “Beating the Rope,” Champ tells the wild true story of James “Crazy Jim” Crisp, an accused murderer whose 1891 crime set off years of escapes, delays, appeals, insanity…
Champ HerrenHost
They used to say in the old days, if a murderer escaped hanging, he was to have beaten the rope, whether through legal or extra-legal means.

I've collected maybe 15 or more of these stories that are worth telling and hope to trickle them out to use in ongoing series.

This began as a research project to update some local history, and it took on a life of its own.

Today's tale is another gleaning from newspapers.com. No big surprise, I'm sure.

For a period of time, I camped out at the dining table with a nightly pot of coffee and tracked down murderers through newspapers from beginning to their ultimate conclusion.

Many of them, there's nothing much to tell, or there is the person pleads guilty and it's never spoken of again.

I had a whole thing arrayed sort of in the fashion of rust coal, if you know what I mean.

What struck me about these accused individuals is many of them, how they work the court system or were able to delay trials in some cases by years.

Well, why did I pick this one? I've got a whole bunch of them, and why I wanted to start with this one.

The story of Jim Crisp and his trial and resulting sentencing put on display the machinations of a local legal system in a first-degree murder case in the Ozarks.

I chose this one because it demonstrates the breadth of legal options to the condemned and just how reluctant citizens were to execute a man legally.

They used to say in the old days, if a murderer escaped hanging, he was to have beaten the rope, whether through legal or extra-legal means.

I've collected maybe 15 or more of these stories that are worth telling and hope to trickle them out to use in ongoing series.

This began as a research project to update some local history, and it took on a life of its own.

Today's tale is another gleaning from newspapers.com. No big surprise, I'm sure.

For a period of time, I camped out at the dining table with a nightly pot of coffee and tracked down murderers through newspapers from beginning to their ultimate conclusion.

Many of them, there's nothing much to tell, or there is the person pleads guilty and it's never spoken of again.

I had a whole thing arrayed sort of in the fashion of rust coal, if you know what I mean.

What struck me about these accused individuals is many of them, how they work the court system or were able to delay trials in some cases by years.

Well, why did I pick this one? I've got a whole bunch of them, and why I wanted to start with this one.

The story of Jim Crisp and his trial and resulting sentencing put on display the machinations of a local legal system in a first-degree murder case in the Ozarks.

I chose this one because it demonstrates the breadth of legal options to the condemned and just how reluctant citizens were to execute a man legally.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.